To address Tenta's point...
Hi, LJL. Been a while, hasn't it?
Sure their ladder matches have been memorable and all that but that's exactly what they were: ladder matches.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but a win is still a win, no matter how it's done, right? Sure, you can argue that ladder matches have no effect here, but, like in any other contest, the better team is going to win the match, regardless of the rules involved with it. Edge and Christian have beaten both The Hardys and The Dudleys plenty of times without ladders, my boy.
I don't see how excelling at something that doesn't even factor into this match is going to give them the edge over the Hart Foundation. The Attitude Era was full of gimmicks and Edge and Christian faced mainly gimmick teams (not really counting the Dudleys) in gimmick matches.
You do realize matches happened in the Attitude Era outside of ladder matches, right? Edge and Christian have fought plenty of matches without tables, ladders, and chairs. As a matter if fact, Edge and Christian only won one of their Tag Team Championships via ladder match. All of the rest have usually come in regular tag team, triple threat tag, and fatal four tag team matches.
How about this, LJL... Let's put it this way. Edge and Christian beat The Rock and The Undertaker. Let's just say that once, we were going to put The Hart Foundation up against Hulk Hogan and The Ultimate Warrior. Not even on the flukiest of flukes would The Harts pull off that win. Simply put, not only did Edge and Christian beat the tag teams in their divisions, they'd usually beat main event wrestlers put into teams. I'm certain at another point they beat the Brothers of Destruction. The point being, while the Hart Foundation were a great team, Edge and Christian were a superstar team, capable of carrying a main event, and no one even flinching at the idea. I can't say the same for The Hart Foundation.
What's some of Edge and Christian's defining moments during their title reigns and I'm not talking about when they won them but between when they won them and when they lost them which was plenty of times.
How about the spear off the ladder at Wrestlemania 17? That perfectly defines Edge and Christian... Opportunistic, and always able to wind up one step ahead of the opponent, in the long run.
Mostly the arguments I'm seeing for Edge and Christian are facts that are totally irrevelant to this particular contest (gimmick matches) or illogical statements (Edge and Christian can't be possibly put down for a three count).
I'm not saying Edge and Christian couldn't be put down for a three count. I just don't think it's going to happen here. No frickin way.