Midnite Express 2009
Getting Noticed By Management
I was reading a post on here about Hacksaw Jim Duggan slamming Vince Russo. I made a comment & said that I believe Vince & Vince both needed each other, as I feel that neither really had the same success after they parted ways. We all are familiar with Vince Russo's WCW days, and if you're not, just know it's one of the many reasons why WCW isn't around anymore. And we all see how the WWE has changed in the past 15-16 years since the start of the Attitude Era till now. Sure, the way our society is today is vastly different from the way it was in 1997-2000, which is arguably the heyday of the Attitude Era and the Monday Night Wars, even so much that Raw was once called Raw Is War and after the 9/11 attacks, WWE decided to drop the "Is War" portion and went back to Monday Night War.
But notwithstanding, I want to know did Vince McMahon need Vince Russo and vice/versa? I believe they did and below are my reasons why:
Reason One: The Product The product of Monday Night Raw/Raw is War was leaps and bounds better then than it was now. Maybe it was the fact that they knew they could really push the envelope and get away with things on television that they couldn't do now. It could also be due to the fact that really neither had failed at what they were doing at the time. Meaning: They hadn't failed at the Attitude Era so keep it going. Sure, the product featured a lot of swearing by Austin, half naked women like Sable running around and Val Venus constantly talking about his, well you know---but beyond that, you had compelling storylines that carried on for a few years. The emergence of The Rock from Leader of the Nation of Domination, to tweener in the fall of 1998 to back to heel in November when he 1st won the WWF title was classic and it showed the way a heel is developed. It reminds me in some ways of how Daniel Bryan turned last year. It was slow, well thought out and when it finally hit it was like, uh, I like this guy, I don't wanna boo but I know he's a heel. Also, the way that The Undertaker, Kane, Mankind & Austin were all interwoven was fantastic. Vince McMahon can't possibly take ALL the credit for that.
Reason Two: WCW This is the WCW BEFORE Vince Russo appeared. The WCW that was constantly battling the WWF and doing all it could to present an equally entertaining show. The results made WWF do all it could to make sure their product was always that much better. But what WCW had to do with it beyond that was that it freed up a lot of space to have the younger stars. WCW was the home of the established stars, sprinkled with a few Cruiserweights. Beyond that, it was just Goldberg as the homegrown talent. But over in the WWF, you had star after star who had yet reached 35 (and in some cases their 30s) who were busting their asses everyday. I know Jim Ross did a lot of the hiring, but when it came to reasonable and believable storylines, you gotta admit Russo did his fair share to see things through.
Reason Three: The Champions WCW had Goldberg, Hogan, Nash, Hart, DDP, Flair & Sting. Nothing to sneeze at but only three of these guys are Hall of Famers and as for DDP, well he was a friend of Eric Bischoff. This isn't taking anything away from DDP or even Nash (who was also Eric's friend) but this is basically the line-up of World Champions from 1996-1999. Now over in the WWF you had (from the same years) Shawn Michaels, Sid, The Undertaker, Hart, Austin, Kane, Mick Foley & The Rock. All current or future Hall of Famers. What this means is that Vince & Vince knew they had something good on their hands & they made sure they were pushed in the right way. When Russo entered WCW, without McMahon as a filter, the WCW Champions included David Arquette, Jeff Jarrett & Scott Steiner, and also Vince Russo. Sure, McMahon "won" the WWF title, but I truly believe that Russo did it to undermine the titles. Vince did it, well for who knows why? Point is, the title holders were who they were. The matches & title changes were entertaining, and when Russo entered WCW, it failed and we all saw it failing. It was a joke at that time.
So these are some of my reasons, there may be more, so please share. Did they need each other? I'm not saying Russo should come back to WWE. In today's WWE, it would never work. But lemme know. Thanks.
But notwithstanding, I want to know did Vince McMahon need Vince Russo and vice/versa? I believe they did and below are my reasons why:
Reason One: The Product The product of Monday Night Raw/Raw is War was leaps and bounds better then than it was now. Maybe it was the fact that they knew they could really push the envelope and get away with things on television that they couldn't do now. It could also be due to the fact that really neither had failed at what they were doing at the time. Meaning: They hadn't failed at the Attitude Era so keep it going. Sure, the product featured a lot of swearing by Austin, half naked women like Sable running around and Val Venus constantly talking about his, well you know---but beyond that, you had compelling storylines that carried on for a few years. The emergence of The Rock from Leader of the Nation of Domination, to tweener in the fall of 1998 to back to heel in November when he 1st won the WWF title was classic and it showed the way a heel is developed. It reminds me in some ways of how Daniel Bryan turned last year. It was slow, well thought out and when it finally hit it was like, uh, I like this guy, I don't wanna boo but I know he's a heel. Also, the way that The Undertaker, Kane, Mankind & Austin were all interwoven was fantastic. Vince McMahon can't possibly take ALL the credit for that.
Reason Two: WCW This is the WCW BEFORE Vince Russo appeared. The WCW that was constantly battling the WWF and doing all it could to present an equally entertaining show. The results made WWF do all it could to make sure their product was always that much better. But what WCW had to do with it beyond that was that it freed up a lot of space to have the younger stars. WCW was the home of the established stars, sprinkled with a few Cruiserweights. Beyond that, it was just Goldberg as the homegrown talent. But over in the WWF, you had star after star who had yet reached 35 (and in some cases their 30s) who were busting their asses everyday. I know Jim Ross did a lot of the hiring, but when it came to reasonable and believable storylines, you gotta admit Russo did his fair share to see things through.
Reason Three: The Champions WCW had Goldberg, Hogan, Nash, Hart, DDP, Flair & Sting. Nothing to sneeze at but only three of these guys are Hall of Famers and as for DDP, well he was a friend of Eric Bischoff. This isn't taking anything away from DDP or even Nash (who was also Eric's friend) but this is basically the line-up of World Champions from 1996-1999. Now over in the WWF you had (from the same years) Shawn Michaels, Sid, The Undertaker, Hart, Austin, Kane, Mick Foley & The Rock. All current or future Hall of Famers. What this means is that Vince & Vince knew they had something good on their hands & they made sure they were pushed in the right way. When Russo entered WCW, without McMahon as a filter, the WCW Champions included David Arquette, Jeff Jarrett & Scott Steiner, and also Vince Russo. Sure, McMahon "won" the WWF title, but I truly believe that Russo did it to undermine the titles. Vince did it, well for who knows why? Point is, the title holders were who they were. The matches & title changes were entertaining, and when Russo entered WCW, it failed and we all saw it failing. It was a joke at that time.
So these are some of my reasons, there may be more, so please share. Did they need each other? I'm not saying Russo should come back to WWE. In today's WWE, it would never work. But lemme know. Thanks.