This is the APA's. Obviously, people see the name Hart and vote for it, but they really shouldn't. The Hart Foundation weren't really that good at all. They were basically given the tag titles when the British Bulldogs got boring, and as soon as Demolition came along they lost them and started getting spanked by the Rougeaus. They lost to the Rockers, except they didn't, but they did really. And they finally lost to the Nasty Boys, who are actually a very similar outfit to the Acolytes.
The Acolytes were booked as being feared by the entire roster, and beat all of the major tag team players at the time. They beat X-Pac and Kane, a team with a similar dynamic to the Hart Foundation. Obviously Sean Waltham wasn't as good as prime Bret Hart, not even close, but the fact of the matter is that he was a significantly more decorated singles star at the time than Hart Foundation era Bret Hart was. Hart when he was in the Hart Foundation was quite crap, kayfabe wise, with hardly any singles success, and tag team success only over smaller technical teams and a Demolition trio on their way out. The Acolytes won their titles off the Hardys, the Dudleys, and X-Pac an Kane, teams that at the time had enjoyed far more success than The British Bulldogs or even Demolition. Honestly, Jim Neidhart was shit. Always was. Hart was booked to be quite weak in Hart Foundation, and was regularly exploited.
The benefit of hindsight is a great thing, but had Bret Hart retired in 1990, when the Hart Foundation finished, they probably wound't be a staple in this tournament, and would have never won it.