If Angle was a big draw, that would be fine. Angle proved when he jumped to TNA, and it stayed at a steady 1.1-1.2, he is not a big draw. He draws nothing. He can get over with the fans, but so can RVD, and RVD has his little croud that follows him, for a small ratings boost as well.
TNA's ratings haven't changed that much because TNA sucks. If RVD went to TNA instead of Kurt Angle I can guarantee you that the ratings would have been the same.
You're right. It is completely diffrent. But I see no reason why not to include them, wrestling is wrestling. Is it not?
In one sentence you say it is completely different and in the next sentence you say wrestling is wrestling. Contradict much.
Not sure how much more I could stress this, to anyone. Entertainment and the professional wrestling business are the EXACT same thing. Without the entertainment aspect of professional wrestling, the ratings would be nothing. Look at indy promotions, they draw 1000's of people if that, nothing more. There could be a few that draw more, and a few that draw less. Thats because most indy's have mediocre mic skills. Theres no entertainment, to their wrestling.
Yes, but Kurt Angle can entertain just as good as RVD if not better and he is a much better in-ring worker. RVD gets pops for his flips and creativity, but Kurt Angle overall puts on more entertaining matches and he is also much better on the mic then RVD.