Fire Marshall Bill
Let me show ya somethin!!!
Supposedly one of the new things coming out this year is going to be a penalty for flopping. The different thing is, is it will be an "after the fact" type of punishment. Basically, a player flops, it's reviewed by the NBA and if they deem it a flop, he gets a fine in the mail.
I find this an interesting approach. On one hand, it does solve the issue of whether or not the ref saw that it was a flop. On the other, without in-game penalties, will players, especially ones making the max contract type salaries, even care that they get a $10,000 (just guessing) fine in the mail if it helps their team win a game?
Flopping in the NBA certainly hasn't reached a soccer-type level (they're artists in a way), but it has become more apparent. It speaks to the softness that the game has turned into. Players like Derrick Rose and Dwayne Wade can now drive the lane witout any hesitation because players are too scared to make them pay these days. Detroit (I believe) used to have a policy on Michael Jordan along the lines of if he drives the lane make him suffer for it. But player safety (for obvious reasons) has become so paramount it's changed the game.
Now I'm not condoning incidents like Detroit/Indiana, Kurt Rambis, or Lambeer/Barkley, but it's gone from "taking one for the team" by drawing a charge has turned into "why take one when I can fake it?" Some look at it as a strategic play, which I can completely see their side, but I don't agree with it. To me it's dirty play, bush league, etc.
So what's your thoughts on the reportedly new flopping rules?
Any ideas on a better enforcement of flopping?
What are your thoughts on flopping in the NBA in general?
One thing I read, which isn't a bad idea, is having the refs review any possible incidents at the quarter breaks. If they find a flop, charge the player with a technical foul and give the other team a free throw. The main issue I see here is it doesn't take away any fouls from the player who was accused of fouling the original flopper. Also, how would that work in the 4th quarter? It wouldn't.
I find this an interesting approach. On one hand, it does solve the issue of whether or not the ref saw that it was a flop. On the other, without in-game penalties, will players, especially ones making the max contract type salaries, even care that they get a $10,000 (just guessing) fine in the mail if it helps their team win a game?
Flopping in the NBA certainly hasn't reached a soccer-type level (they're artists in a way), but it has become more apparent. It speaks to the softness that the game has turned into. Players like Derrick Rose and Dwayne Wade can now drive the lane witout any hesitation because players are too scared to make them pay these days. Detroit (I believe) used to have a policy on Michael Jordan along the lines of if he drives the lane make him suffer for it. But player safety (for obvious reasons) has become so paramount it's changed the game.
Now I'm not condoning incidents like Detroit/Indiana, Kurt Rambis, or Lambeer/Barkley, but it's gone from "taking one for the team" by drawing a charge has turned into "why take one when I can fake it?" Some look at it as a strategic play, which I can completely see their side, but I don't agree with it. To me it's dirty play, bush league, etc.
So what's your thoughts on the reportedly new flopping rules?
Any ideas on a better enforcement of flopping?
What are your thoughts on flopping in the NBA in general?
One thing I read, which isn't a bad idea, is having the refs review any possible incidents at the quarter breaks. If they find a flop, charge the player with a technical foul and give the other team a free throw. The main issue I see here is it doesn't take away any fouls from the player who was accused of fouling the original flopper. Also, how would that work in the 4th quarter? It wouldn't.