Razor | WrestleZone Forums

Razor

  • Thread starter Thread starter X
  • Start date Start date

X

RIP Sgt. Michael Paranzino / RIP CM
Your opinions on ROH make me burst into laughter at just how incredibly biased you are and just how incredibly wrong you are.

But yeah, tell me about how this match is a pile of horseshit:

http://www.megavideo.com/?d=YOD53O66



I love you man, but you're full of shit when it comes to anything other than the WWE. You've become a mini-Slyfox.
 
I finally watched Joe-Kobashi.

I'm hip to indy-fads from five years ago fo' sho.
 
I've just never seen someone so incredibly biased in my life. He doesn't even attempt to give ROH a chance, he calls it pure shit despite having seen all of maybe three matches featuring random people, and criticizes every spot. It's fucking sad really because he just does not know what he's talking about. I laughed my head off when he said Nigel McGuinness ripped off Bradshaw's "Clothesline From Hell" and that he couldn't pull it off. I'm still laughing about that one. It's called a fucking Lariat and Nigel does it better than just about anyone in the business, the man has fucking shattered his arm into pieces over the years from how hard and frequently he uses the lariat.
 
Is that the match where the two guys pussy slap each other in a completely unrealistic and unbelievable fashion, making any reasonable wrestling fan wonder why in the fuck the other person doesn't try to move?

Yeah, that match sucked. If it's not, then I'm sure it still will suck, I'll just how to give a different reason why.
 
Who's Nigel McGuinness? I've never seen him on my TV, so he must not exist.

There's this guy named Desmond Wolfe who has a pretty sick Lariat though. You should check him out.
 
Is that the match where the two guys pussy slap each other in a completely unrealistic and unbelievable fashion, making any reasonable wrestling fan wonder why in the fuck the other person doesn't try to move?

You mean chops? One of the most basic wrestling moves in the world used by almost every wrestler to ever live? The kind that Ric Flair made a career out of? Yeah, what losers for using that move. There's nothing unrealistic about that match whatsoever.


Yeah, that match sucked. If it's not, then I'm sure it still will suck, I'll just how to give a different reason why.

Yeah, would love to hear your reasons as to how that match sucked. I need a good laugh.
 
You mean chops? One of the most basic wrestling moves in the world used by almost every wrestler to ever live? The kind that Ric Flair made a career out of? Yeah, what losers for using that move. There's nothing unrealistic about that match whatsoever.
There's a difference between a chop and a slap. And Kobashi just slaps him 3252 times in a row, the last of which barely have any force behind them.

Yeah, would love to hear your reasons as to how that match sucked. I need a good laugh.
Is it the same match I referred to earlier? Because I've already given my reasons.

Why don't you quit watching shitty wrestling and instead understand that wrestling is an art, and that ROH was/is filled with guys who are little more than spot monkeys who are only over because they use cool movez that moronic smarks thing make them good wrestlers. Because, as we all know, the number of offensive moves you use is the ONLY basis for being a good wrestler.

The match was terrible. Quit being such a mark for piss bucket wrestling.
 
There's a difference between a chop and a slap. And Kobashi just slaps him 3252 times in a row, the last of which barely have any force behind them.

No, those are called chops. Something that has been a part of Kobashi's MO through out his entire career. You see Sly, when you chop someone about 3252 times in a row, your arm starts to get tired, which explains why the last didn't have much force behind it. It would have been unrealistic for him to have the same force behind his last chop as his first one Sly.

Why don't you quit watching shitty wrestling and instead understand that wrestling is an art, and that ROH was/is filled with guys who are little more than spot monkeys who are only over because they use cool movez that moronic smarks thing make them good wrestlers. Because, as we all know, the number of offensive moves you use is the ONLY basis for being a good wrestler.

And thanks for proving yet again you've maybe watched two matches in ROH history. The entire roster is full of spot monkeys? Yeah, not even close bud, sorry. Tell me about how Danielson and Nigel are spot monkeys.

The match was terrible. Quit being such a mark for piss bucket wrestling.

Yep, keep living in your fantasy world.
 
No, those are called chops. Something that has been a part of Kobashi's MO through out his entire career. You see Sly, when you chop someone about 3252 times in a row, your arm starts to get tired, which explains why the last didn't have much force behind it. It would have been unrealistic for him to have the same force behind his last chop as his first one Sly.
So then what is the fucking point of continuing to chop? Why not throw a knee? Why not a body slam? Why the hell is Joe just standing in the cornering not moving out of the way of those weak ass slaps?

Again, it was stupid.

And thanks for proving yet again you've maybe watched two matches in ROH history.
I have five different ROH DVDs in my collection, but thanks for playing. Add to that the other matches I've watched (such as their entire first PPV), including the ones I've reviewed, such as the Punk vs. Joe series, and Danielson vs. Nigel from Unified, and I think it's pretty clear you're ignorantly talking out of your ass.

Then again, that's not really anything new with you when it comes to wrestling, now is it?

The entire roster is full of spot monkeys?
Did I say that?

Yes, yes I did. So why did you repeat it in question form? Reading comprehension problem?

Yeah, not even close bud, sorry. Tell me about how Danielson and Nigel are spot monkeys.
You would have to know what a spot monkey is to understand how. And if you do understand what a spot monkey is, then watch their match from Unified and you will have your answer.

Yep, keep living in your fantasy world.
If only this was my fantasy world, so I wouldn't have to keep watching you degrade people who don't like terrible wrestling. There are actually people in the world, X, who appreciate the art of wrestling, and not the terrible stuff from ROH that you seem to enjoy.
 
So then what is the fucking point of continuing to chop? Why not throw a knee? Why not a body slam? Why the hell is Joe just standing in the cornering not moving out of the way of those weak ass slaps?

Again, it was stupid.

It really wasn't. Why continue to chop him? Because it fucking hurts Sly, why do you think? Tell you what, go call up Kenta Kobashi and have him chop you for a few minutes, tell me how good it feels.

I have five different ROH DVDs in my collection, but thanks for playing. Add to that the other matches I've watched, including the ones I've reviewed, such as the Punk vs. Joe series, and Danielson vs. Nigel from Unified, and I think it's pretty clear you're ignorantly talking out your ass.

Please Sly you're the most biased person I've ever met in my life, you never give a chance to anything that you've already decided in your mind sucks. You see the ROH kids saying they hate John Cena and you just automatically assume all of ROH sucks and you go into it with that attitude. You watch something expecting it to suck, you're going to think it sucks.


When have you reviewed ROH matches? I'd love to read those.


Then again, that's not really anything new with you when it comes to wrestling, now is it?

Did I say that?

Yes, yes I did. So why did you repeat it in question form? Reading comprehension problem?

Ahh yes, when your argument is shit resort to being a smartass. Any spelling errors you want to point out?

You would have to know what a spot monkey is to understand how. And if you do understand what a spot monkey is, then watch their match from Unified and you will have your answer.

I've seen their match from Unified, and I've got a question for you Sly because apparently it's YOU who doesn't understand what a spot is or what a spot monkey is. Guess who else is a spot monkey? John Cena. The Rock. Stone Cold. Shawn Michaels. Bret Hart. Ric Flair. Hulk Hogan. All of them are spot monkeys and you know why? Because they all had a routine of pre-planned "spots" (which is what a spot is, a spot doesn't have to be throwing someone through a table, a spot is any part of the match you've got planned ahead to guide you through the match).

People dismissing wrestlers for being "spot monkeys" crack me up. Are you angry that they entertain the crowd so much or something?


If only this was my fantasy world, so I wouldn't have to keep watching you degrade people who don't like terrible wrestling. There are actually people in the world, X, who appreciate the art of wrestling, and not the terrible stuff from ROH that you seem to enjoy.

And if only we lived in a world where you were able to judge professional wrestling outside of the WWE. It's impossible however, clearly. Nevermind that guys like Nigel and Danielson know how to keep the crowd in the palm of their hand and deliver everything the fans want in their matches or the great feuds behind them, no it's all shit because it's not the WWE.


It's kind of sad that after all these years you still can't watch indy wrestling without bias.
 
I replied to your Cena vs. Edge post X. I'll give you this. I may disagree with you about Edge but at least you put up good arguments unlike the rest of the Edge supporters.
 
I replied to your Cena vs. Edge post X. I'll give you this. I may disagree with you about Edge but at least you put up good arguments unlike the rest of the Edge supporters.

Thanks Jerry. I'll go reply to it. Yeah I hate it when we get the noobs in those kinds of threads yelling "Cena only knoez 5 moves!11!", doesn't help my argument at all.
 
I hate the term "spot monkey" for the reasons you listed, X.

So do I. I've been guilty of using it myself in the past, especially with Jeff Hardy, but I've come to appreciate both him and completely dismiss the term "spot-monkey" over time. Spots are like the road-map of a match, it's how the two wrestlers in the ring tell their story. Spots are like chapters to the match, so it has a logical and entertaining flow. I mean, yeah don't get me wrong there are matches that are pure spotfests that just have no flow whatsoever from spot to spot, but otherwise I have no idea what people have against wrestlers doing difficult moves that make the crowd struck in awe.
 
I mean, yeah don't get me wrong there are matches that are pure spotfests that just have no flow whatsoever from spot to spot,

Undertaker vs. Edge in HIAC is guilty of this and is one of my least favourite matches ever as a result. It was a chore to watch.
 
It really wasn't. Why continue to chop him? Because it fucking hurts Sly, why do you think?
It fucking hurts? You just said his arm was tired and it doesn't have much force behind it. How does that hurt? That's just silly, and you defeating your own argument.

Please Sly you're the most biased person I've ever met in my life, you never give a chance to anything that you've already decided in your mind sucks.
That'd be a good point, if I had actually started watching ROH when I thought it sucked, and NOT when I thought it was supposed to be great. But see, unlike you, I can watch something and form my own opinion of it, and not just go along with what everyone else says about it.

You see the ROH kids saying they hate John Cena and you just automatically assume all of ROH sucks and you go into it with that attitude.
Another great point, except I was watching ROH matches before I ever liked Cena, and before it was cool to hate on Cena.

Here was the first ROH DVD I bought:

z_roh_roadtitle.jpg


If you do your research, you'll see the show was held back in 2002. I probably got it in 2003 or 2004 (I know it was my first year of college).

When have you reviewed ROH matches? I'd love to read those.
I reviewed the Nigel vs. Danielson match from Unified, and I BELIEVE I posted a review of Driven 2007 (and if I didn't, I know I wrote up most of it) in which I blasted ROH fans for being so anti "sports entertainment" while enjoying a show which saw Sydal join a faction, Austin Aries come out of the crowd to clear the ring, etc. I also blasted the show for putting a 4 minute World title match before a taped non-title match between Danielson and Nigel. I gave decent praise to the opening six man tag match, calling it a decent opener, bashed Claudio as a terrible worker, and mentioned I was halfway impressed with one of the Briscoes.

I honestly don't know if I posted the Driven review, but I know the Nigel vs. Danielson review is somewhere. I called it something like "Slyfox gives ROH another chance).

I've seen their match from Unified, and I've got a question for you Sly because apparently it's YOU who doesn't understand what a spot is or what a spot monkey is. Guess who else is a spot monkey? John Cena. The Rock. Stone Cold. Shawn Michaels. Bret Hart. Ric Flair. Hulk Hogan. All of them are spot monkeys and you know why? Because they all had a routine of pre-planned "spots" (which is what a spot is, a spot doesn't have to be throwing someone through a table, a spot is any part of the match you've got planned ahead to guide you through the match).

People dismissing wrestlers for being "spot monkeys" crack me up. Are you angry that they entertain the crowd so much or something?
*shakes head*

You obviously don't understand the term spot monkey. I know what a spot is. A spot monkey, though, is a worker who goes from spot to spot, with no reasonable or logical transition in between. Take the Savage vs. Steamboat match from WM 3, for example. Almost the entire match was planned out ahead of time, but since the transition from spot to spot was flawless and believable, it wouldn't fit under the spot monkey term.

Like I said, if you knew what the term meant, then you'd understand.


And if only we lived in a world where you were able to judge professional wrestling outside of the WWE. It's impossible however, clearly. Nevermind that guys like Nigel and Danielson know how to keep the crowd in the palm of their hand and deliver everything the fans want in their matches or the great feuds behind them, no it's all shit because it's not the WWE.


It's kind of sad that after all these years you still can't watch indy wrestling without bias.
I've seen plenty of indy matches...doesn't change the fact that most of it sucks. Look no further than CM Punk and Samoa Joe. The former GODS of indy wrestling, look how long it took them to EVER make a mark for themselves in the WWE. Some would argue that both Punk and Joe STILL haven't proven themselves as worthy main-eventers, despite MASSIVE pushes over the years.

At the end of the day, Indy wrestling is a place for those with potential to be picked up by those with quality. Those with quality then work and shape and mold those with potential to try and make them good workers.

It has nothing to do with the WWE, it has to do with quality wrestling.
 
Isn't Slyfox696 a fan of storytelling? Why would he disrespect possibly the greatest storyteller ever (i.e., Kobashi)?
Because the match was shit. Why don't people on the Internet understand that just because a good worker is in a match, that doesn't mean the match will be good?
 
WWE matches should not be what's looked at as the RIGHT way to wrestle a professional wrestling match. You WWE elitist need to understand that. You also need to understand what "alternative" means. It means something different than what you're usually used to seeing, and that's what companies like ROH offers. You guys want ROH to be just like WWE, but why would they ever do that? They created the company to be DIFFERENT from WWE.

The fact of the matter is this... ROH wrestlers work just as hard as any wrestlers in WWE and TNA, and it's very rare where the fans at a ROH show leave unhappy, especially back around 2005/2006, which is the stuff Sly and Razor are shitting on. Seriously, if those matches are so terrible, then how come the crowds are going nuts for it? How come you don't read many reviews on the 'net that say they regretted buying a ROH DVD? Because it's GOOD professional wrestling, for fans who are looking for something different than WWE. "Different" does not equal "Bad".
 
It fucking hurts? You just said his arm was tired and it doesn't have much force behind it. How does that hurt? That's just silly, and you defeating your own argument.

No, you're just twisting my words. His arm did get tired for performing the chops, as anyone's arm would, but the first flurry of chops were impactful and definitely painful, you can tell from the swelling on Joe's chest. Why is it such a problem that he laid some chops on the guy in the corner? I've never heard anyone start calling out Flair for doing the same.

That'd be a good point, if I had actually started watching ROH when I thought it sucked, and NOT when I thought it was supposed to be great. But see, unlike you, I can watch something and form my own opinion of it, and not just go along with what everyone else says about it.

Oh yes, I'm a sheep, of course! That's why I so often agree with what the majority of our posters on here say, right? That must be why we're arguing right now, because I love following the crowd. You're right Sly, I saw those indie hipsters watching their ROH and I said "Hey! Those guys are COOL! I must be one!"

Yep, you caught me Sly. That's me, Mr. Sheep. I follow all the coolest trends, didn't you know?

But seriously Sly, realistically, how could every single fucking ROH match suck? Do you like ANY match from ROH history? I mean, you know your math, do you not? The odds of every single match in thousands and thousands of matches being shit are absolutely astronomical, if not downright impossible.

Another great point, except I was watching ROH matches before I ever liked Cena, and before it was cool to hate on Cena.

Really I was just referring to the crowd's penchant for chanting things like "Fuck John Cena", which I think is completely and totally fucking stupid and makes me ashamed to be watching ROH. That said the sometimes idiotic crowds aside, it's obvious that there is one particular style of wrestling that you enjoy, and John Cena is excellent in that brawling style.

I just don't know what the hell you have against ROH. You're a fan of AJ Styles and Shelton Benjamin, but ROH sucks because it's full of spot monkeys? That just doesn't make any sense to me man.


Here was the first ROH DVD I bought:

z_roh_roadtitle.jpg


If you do your research, you'll see the show was held back in 2002. I probably got it in 2003 or 2004 (I know it was my first year of college).

I reviewed the Nigel vs. Danielson match from Unified, and I BELIEVE I posted a review of Driven 2007 (and if I didn't, I know I wrote up most of it) in which I blasted ROH fans for being so anti "sports entertainment" while enjoying a show which saw Sydal join a faction, Austin Aries come out of the crowd to clear the ring, etc. I also blasted the show for putting a 4 minute World title match before a taped non-title match between Danielson and Nigel. I gave decent praise to the opening six man tag match, calling it a decent opener, bashed Claudio as a terrible worker, and mentioned I was halfway impressed with one of the Briscoes.

2002 and 2003 ROH was just getting started, those were some of the weakest cards they ever held. Night of Appreciation is a pretty good card from their first year outside of it's awful opener.

But ROH really didn't hit their stride until around 2004.

I honestly don't know if I posted the Driven review, but I know the Nigel vs. Danielson review is somewhere. I called it something like "Slyfox gives ROH another chance).

I'll have to search for it. What's your take on Danielson and Nigel? Hate them?

*shakes head*

You obviously don't understand the term spot monkey. I know what a spot is. A spot monkey, though, is a worker who goes from spot to spot, with no reasonable or logical transition in between.

I just talked about that actually. That's the only time I'd consider calling a wrestler a "spot monkey", but in essence every wrestler with a patented routine of moves in their match could be called a spot monkey.

Take the Savage vs. Steamboat match from WM 3, for example. Almost the entire match was planned out ahead of time, but since the transition from spot to spot was flawless and believable, it wouldn't fit under the spot monkey term.

And neither would I, I just talked about that in my post before addressed to Doc.

Like I said, if you knew what the term meant, then you'd understand.

Still waiting to hear about how Nigel and Danielson are spot monkeys.


I've seen plenty of indy matches...doesn't change the fact that most of it sucks. Look no further than CM Punk and Samoa Joe. The former GODS of indy wrestling, look how long it took them to EVER make a mark for themselves in the WWE.

Yeah CM Punk has been in the WWE for less than four years and is already a multiple time World Champion. What in the fuck are you talking about? When did that become a long time to hit the main event? Took HBK, Hart, Flair, Austin, and most other major stars of wrestling much longer than that to win their first World Titles. How has CM Punk's WWE run been anything other than a complete success? He just main evented and won the Summerslam main event Sly in a match people are hailing. How has Punk's WWE career been anything other than a story of success?

Some would argue that both Punk and Joe STILL haven't proven themselves as worthy main-eventers, despite MASSIVE pushes over the years.

Anyone who would argue that would be wrong too. Punk has proven his worth as a main eventer this year in the WWE, and the main event in TNA isn't nearly as prestigious as the WWEs main event so Joe really can come and go in the TNA main event scene as he pleases and it's completely believable. He is a former World Champion.

At the end of the day, Indy wrestling is a place for those with potential to be picked up by those with quality. Those with quality then work and shape and mold those with potential to try and make them good workers.

It has nothing to do with the WWE, it has to do with quality wrestling.

I want you to give me an indy match that IS a good wrestling match Sly. Because I really don't believe that you could believe that all of indy wrestling sucks.
 
WWE matches should not be what's looked at as the RIGHT way to wrestle a professional wrestling match.
And I never said it was, I just said it's the best in the US today. And it's true.

You also need to understand what "alternative" means. It means something different than what you're usually used to seeing, and that's what companies like ROH offers. You guys want ROH to be just like WWE, but why would they ever do that? They created the company to be DIFFERENT from WWE.
There has been a ton of wrestling that has been different than what the WWE primarily showcases today that has been good.

But just because something is different, doesn't mean it is good.

The fact of the matter is this... ROH wrestlers work just as hard as any wrestlers in WWE and TNA
And I work just as hard at my job as Roy Williams at UNC...what does that have to do with how good we do our job?

and it's very rare where the fans at a ROH show leave unhappy, especially back around 2005/2006, which is the stuff Sly and Razor are shitting on. Seriously, if those matches are so terrible, then how come the crowds are going nuts for it?
I've already said that in this thread. It's because those fans are marks for offensive moves, and don't care about ANY other part of wrestling.

How come you don't read many reviews on the 'net that say they regretted buying a ROH DVD?
Because the only people who buy the ROH DVD are ROH fans.

Now how about I ask YOU a question. If ROH is such good wrestling, then how come they are on the brink of financial ruin? It seems to me that if ROH was good, then people would want to watch it. But they cannot gain new fans, and are losing the fans they used to have.

ROH fans just have to accept the truth I've been giving for years...ROH just isn't that good.
 
Sly, to draw a parallel between Kobashi's chops/slaps and Benoit's rolling German suplexes do you think that when Chris benoit does a long chain of german suplexes and with him and his opponent getting tired from them (see: the video of him chaining 10 German suplexes on Steve Austin) and the quality of them droping noticably because of it, do you think "why the fuck is Benoit still doing German suplexes? They're starting to look shit, he should switch up his offense"? Because whatever way you look at it those suplexes are still going to be effective, tired participents or not.

The same thing applies to Kobashi's chops. He might not be chopping you as hard at the end as at the begining, but they still fucking hurt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: X

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top