Q.e.d. | WrestleZone Forums

Q.e.d.

Murfish

is losing his edge
quod erat demonstrandum

I'm going to use proofs to make a point from now on. I've already begun a subtle implementation of the technique.
 
Murfish is a tool.


Prove me wrong, Murfy.

Let's start out with a supposition.

1) Suppose that Murfish is a tool.
2) As an insult, the definition of a tool is...
The word "tool" may be used as an insult, describing someone who is being used by an establishment willingly (as a sycophant), or unwillingly (as one who blindly conforms). Alternatively, the insult "tool" can imply that a person is unable (or unwilling) to form an independent opinion on a given topic.
3) A contradiction occurs because Murfish is not being used by the establishment (WZ).
Evidence: Murfish's voluntary demoddation. Murfish could have continued to work and use up the time that Murfish needs to spend on the important events that are happening this school year, but Murfish decided not to.
Also Murfish is both capable of and willing to make independent opinions on given topics.
Evidence: Murfish disagrees with the statement 'Murfish is a tool'. Thus Murfish is capable of and willing to have original opinions.
4) The evidence contradicts the supposition. Therefore the supposition cannot be true and is in fact false.

Q.E.D.
 
Let's start out with a supposition.

1) Suppose that Murfish is a tool.
2) As an insult, the definition of a tool is...
The word "tool" may be used as an insult, describing someone who is being used by an establishment willingly (as a sycophant), or unwillingly (as one who blindly conforms). Alternatively, the insult "tool" can imply that a person is unable (or unwilling) to form an independent opinion on a given topic.
3) A contradiction occurs because Murfish is not being used by the establishment (WZ).
Evidence: Murfish's voluntary demoddation. Murfish could have continued to work and use up the time that Murfish needs to spend on the important events that are happening this school year, but Murfish decided not to.
Also Murfish is both capable of and willing to make independent opinions on given topics.
Evidence: Murfish disagrees with the statement 'Murfish is a tool'. Thus Murfish is capable of and willing to have original opinions.
4) The evidence contradicts the supposition. Therefore the supposition cannot be true and is in fact false.

Q.E.D.

In other words you agree your a tool.
 
I propose this to the contrary...

Murfish made a thread to make himself appear intelligent.
This makes him appear toolish
Tools are toolish
Murfish is a tool

QED
 
I propose this to the contrary...

Murfish made a thread to make himself appear intelligent.
This makes him appear toolish
Tools are toolish
Murfish is a tool

QED

Wrong, I made this thread because I was thinking of one of my math teachers and wanted to disagree in a more orderly way. I'm a prescriptivist, so you can't just make up the meanings of words on my watch.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top