From Ridley Scott's recent interview with Metro:
http://www.metro.co.uk/film/914651-ridley-scott-blade-runner-sequel-is-no-rumour-its-happening
I would definitely watch a Prometheus sequel. Since buying it on DVD, I've probably watched it three or four times already, and I can't enough of it. Yeah, I know. It's an unsatisfying Alien prequel with too many unanswered questions, a painfully long run time, and convoluted story. But Prometheus 2 (or whatever the hell Scott decides to call it) could provide more clarity, and answer unresolved questions.
As far as Blade Runner goes.... I think I'll pass on it. A sequel for Blade Runner just feels so unnecessary, and I can't picture anyone besides Harrison Ford as the lead. As Scott alluded to in the interview, Harrison Ford is a lot older now. He's seventy years old, so portraying a believable version of the Rick Deckard character might be too much of a stretch. But Scott never confirms anything, so he could kill off the character.
Your thoughts?
What made you want to tackle sci-fi again?
I hadnt done sci-fi for so long and I enjoyed doing it. Plus, when it comes to the Alien world, no one else had addressed the origin question and I thought that was interesting to tackle. Prometheus evolved into a whole other universe. Youve got a person [Noomi Rapaces Elizabeth Shaw] with a head in a bag [ Michael Fassbenders David] that functions and has an IQ of 350. It can explain to her how to put the head back on the body and shes gonna think about that long and hard because, once the head is back on his body, hes dangerous.
So thats the sequel?
[Laughs] I wish it was that easy. Theyre going off to paradise but it could be the most savage, horrible place. Who are the Engineers?
Was it your idea to shoot in 3D?
Yes, but it was an obvious thing to do. I may as well join the club, you know? Celluloid is disappearing. The labs dont exist any more except to service the old films. I like the digital process. Its more reliable. You push a button and you get 5,000 prints that are all exactly the same but if I was going to do it physically with film, at the end of the process the chemical has gotten so used its no longer functioning. I would never use film again.
Why did you use a lot of real sets rather than full CGI like, say, Avatar?
[Laughs] Because it was a quarter of the price of Avatar. Sorry, Jim! Im a cameraman, primarily. My films have always been criticised for being too visual, too misty, too this or too that, but I dont care. Were dealing with a visual medium; storytelling is entirely visual, as Hitchcock said. Because I went to art school and I can draw, I know exactly how the script is going to evolve into a film.
There is a rumour youll be making a Blade Runner sequel.
Its not a rumour its happening. With Harrison Ford? I dont know yet. Is he too old? Well, he was a Nexus-6 so we dont know how long he can live [laughs]. And thats all Im going to say at this stage.
http://www.metro.co.uk/film/914651-ridley-scott-blade-runner-sequel-is-no-rumour-its-happening
I would definitely watch a Prometheus sequel. Since buying it on DVD, I've probably watched it three or four times already, and I can't enough of it. Yeah, I know. It's an unsatisfying Alien prequel with too many unanswered questions, a painfully long run time, and convoluted story. But Prometheus 2 (or whatever the hell Scott decides to call it) could provide more clarity, and answer unresolved questions.
As far as Blade Runner goes.... I think I'll pass on it. A sequel for Blade Runner just feels so unnecessary, and I can't picture anyone besides Harrison Ford as the lead. As Scott alluded to in the interview, Harrison Ford is a lot older now. He's seventy years old, so portraying a believable version of the Rick Deckard character might be too much of a stretch. But Scott never confirms anything, so he could kill off the character.
Your thoughts?