Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Christian may be the most overrated wrestler I've ever seen. What is this greatness that I've never seen in him? He's a solid midcarder. That's about all. He fits in on ECW and was good in TNA. He's not a mainstream main eventer though. No way.
Christian proved in TNA that he's just not main event material. Great on the mic, but he didn't have a single match in TNA that could be called a classic. It's not like he wasn't given the oppertunity.
Don't people talk about TNA as having the best talent in wrestling today> He was allowed to feud with Sting, Angle, Styles, Joe and others. And like you said, he had a great match with Kaz. In fact that was probably his best match in the company. And it wasn't a great ladder match, it was just very good.
He was given the oppertunity and he didn't do much with it. His main event matches might have suffered from the usual TNA ref bumps and such. But his mid card matches were usually free from a lot of that stuff. Yet he still didn't produce anything worth watching again.
Styles and Joe are nowhere near main event material either,
they had some entertaining matches when they were in the x-division but aside from that they lack charisma, the ability to sell, and are unable to storytell to a satisfactory extent for main eventers.
He hasn't had a singles feud with Sting, and his singles feud with Angle was breif - the match they had was good but tarnished by stupid TNA endings.
I guess its a matter of opinion, Christian's second run as champion was ok I felt, in fact its the only time I have watched TNA on a regular basis. I'm not saying he set TNA alight but no-one has been able to.
He did a decent job as champion, and it wasn't a dramatic failure ala CM Punk, Samoa Joe, Rey Mysterio etc.
They were.
Styles and Joe have both and better matches than Christian in TNA.
Charisma is overrated anyway, it's not like it helped Cage.
If I had time I'd look up how much he's faced those two over the past couple of years. Lots is my guess. Feuds sell PPVs, but most of the time, in TNA at least, it's the matches you remember.
Kurt Angle & the X-Division.
Punk & Mysterio were underdog champions, and Joe wasn't booked in the same way as how he gained popularity in TNA.
They didnt though, Samoa Joe had some ok matches with Angle, and AJ styles has had some good matches but thats it. Neither have had any great matches just like Cage.
Only Angle/Sting have had great matches.
Please don't count Styles/Joe's spot fests in the x-division as great matches.
Charisma is vitally important, how many champions have got over without charisma, ever?
Which is part of my point, Cage never had any bad matches, the majority of his matches were decent, so you can't criticise him by saying his matches were awful. As for matches been memorable, there really hasnt been that many memorable matches in TNA's entire history, like I said Angle and Sting have had a couple and thats about it.
The x-division isnt a draw,
if the x-division was so great the WWE would have one too.
The point of what I was saying was that Christian didnt do any worst than any of the other champions ever in TNA excluding Angle and Sting who are two proven draws.
Ratings were steady through Cage's run as champion, no-one really knows TNA PPV buyrates so you cant say he was a failure as champion in any way.
Just because he didnt draw a load more people to TNA or have loads of 5 star matches with a bunch of glorified indy wrestlers in the most part, he's not main event material?
Styles & Joe have had great matches for the enviroment they are in.
Angle w/ Joe.
Sting?
Why not?
It is important. But the end result should always be match quality. Charisma will help engage people, but you can get by without it if you're talented enough.
All his matches were fine. Nothing special, not great or awful. He's had Jeff Jarrett's career, sandwiched into two and a half years.
It was for TNA at one point.
Nope. If WWE hand an X-Division then Rey Mysterio wouldn't serve much of a purpose.
They don't appear to be drawing too well for TNA at the moment.
well I can, because I'm basing it on matches and not how many people watched him. There was nothing special about any of his matches. Maybe you can blame the people he faced, but those same wrestlers have all gone on to have some pretty good matches with other opponents.
Glorified indy wrestlers?
No he's not main event material. TNA realized that after a while and turned him into an upper mid card wrestler.
Sting/Angle BFG.
And none of Angle/Joe's matches were any better than Angle/Cage final resolution '08 or against all odds 2007.
Because they are spot fests that dont appeal to the vast majority of fans, and were matches devoid of storytelling, like most cruiserweight matches.
Who has ever been a sustained main eventer without charisma? There needs to be a decent level of charisma otherwise people lose interest quicker, better charisma also helps develop storylines as such.
Exactly he's consistant, Joe and Styles are not.
When they had record low ratings? I don't class that as drawing.
I agree, Mysterio would be a terrible x-division wrestler because he's too old to hit the spots he used to be able to.
What record 1.3 ratings aren't good?
Your opinion on his matches is irrelevent, and subjective. In fact so is mine, what is important is what the majority of fans think of them.
They were. People remember the Joe/Angle matches, and people honestly thought that it might make TNA into a legit challenger to WWE
You're mistaking the X-Division matches of now with the ones from 4 years ago.
Undertaker, but that's a poor example because he had a killer gimmick.
Yokozuna was another.
How are they not? Styles is one of the few wrestlers around that almost everybody loves.
Drawing in the same way ROH does. It's different from WWE so people liked it and sought it out.
The crusierweight title was meaningless, the lack of mainstream popularity for crusierweight wrestling in the majority of WWE's terrorities (USA, Canada, and Europe mostly) meant that there was little demand to see cruiserweight style of wrestling.
In addition I have argued in the past, and I'm sure it was a consideration when WWE took the decision that crusierweight wrestling generally teaches wrestlers the wrong thing. Instead of learning to storytell, and perfecting selling opponents offense, some wrestlers are conned into believing that the most iportant thing about wrestling is who can hit the best move, or how many spots you can fit into a match. WWE obviously doesnt want young talent, picking up bad habits because these wrestlers become almost useless when you bring them out of the circus style of cruiserweight wrestling.
Another factor is WWE had too many championships, it still did. WWE decided to get rid of the one with the least credibility/prestige/importance - common sense really.
The final factor was probably that TNA were building the X-division around these type of wrestlers. A huge mistake on TNA's part looking back at it, Vince possibly saw what the x-division was doing to TNA and how it was starting to drag the credibility of TNA down, WWE obviously wasn't going to invest in a type of wrestling that is failing, when another company had already invested in it with little sucess. WWE deciced to distance itself from cruiserweight wrestling which a good decision in my book.
Going up in the ratings is good. But improving weekly each week is better. When will they go up to 1.4? Whatever a 1.4 is.
The majority of fans think Christian is a better talker than wrestler. The majority of fans also don't talk about Christian matches in the same way they do everyone else.
I don't except the one they had in the cage i think that was supposed to be like an MMA shoot fight, and I only remember that because it was terrible.
Anyone who believes or ever believes TNA can compete with WWE is deluded. And who said this, the majority of wrestling fans or some IWFs?
They were still crap, they had better wrestlers competing in them granted, but the matches were still spot fests.
I will actualy conceed this point as there is an exception, and that is big guys. Big guys often dont need charisma because they get over because of their size. However even so all of his sucessful feuds, came against wrestlers who had a great amount of charisma. My point was it is very rare, and very difficult to get over, and to have a sucessful sustained main event run without charisma.
Styles is ok, but he isn't a main eventer.
He is no better in Christian in ring. Explain how he is better? Because he can hit bigger moves?
Christian is a superior storyteller,
seller
and mic worker.
Styles is somewhat similar to someone like CM Punk, if you need a comparrison to help understand.
The market for that type of wrestling is tiny, otherwise TNA would run two hours of x-division action.
I don't know when they will, but because average ratings are increasing you have to consider Angle/Sting draws. Of course Sting especially is a proven draw, and although Angle never drew brilliantly for WWE he is a big fish in a little pond so to speak so can still draw for them.
I agree he is a better talker than in ring wrestler, but his matches are still good.
He is a really good seller
and a decent storyteller
and because it is very difficult to criticise his style of wrestling when people criticise him like you are doing now without any reasoning to why his matches are bad
Btw who is the majority? The IWC? because they only make up a minority of even TNA's fans.