*NEW* Picture of Undertaker Surfaces! You will be SHOCKED!

[babinko]

My first reaction to this picture; WOW! Undertaker looks like he aged quite a bit in the last few months. Right now we are all getting geared up at the return of The Undertaker so pictures like these pop up every year right before his return. I remember we just had the shocker of how he shaved his head, but by gawd, he looks like a Grandpa in this!

No matter how he looks, Undertaker is still an ass kicker deep down. We also get many bad pictures taken of us during our lifetime but this one is hard to live down. I get Taker has some time to throw on some Just for Men and lace up his boots, but does this picture prove we are getting to the real end of his career?

Is his age now really catching up to him?
Could this be a sign it is time to do one final Wrestlemania?

Thoughts on this picture?

 

[CrucifiedRaven]

He looks exactly the same as he always has, he just needs to dye his white facial hair darker, same as most guys from this generation (See: Kevin Nash).
He looks actually like he's in good shape.
I'm not shocked. And I don't think you should be either.

 

[The Eighties]

I'm certainly shocked, he has always been a white dude!!

A bit of dye, plenty of low lighting and keeping his hood up will make it look less like Brock is squaring up to a biker version of Santa Claus next week.

 

[ABMorales787]

Really? He looks the same he did last year minus some dye to me.

 

[nightmare]

Only reason its 'shocking' to some people is that Taker does not break character. He is the only guy I can remember that has kept his gimmick & real life separate so well during his career.


He is just a man & getting older. This just shows we should cheer like hell while we still can, because one day soon he will just be Mark Callaway again. When it is time to turn it up, he puts the game face on like no other. So when the time comes for him to put the boots on, he will be just as we expect- The Deadman. When he cut off his hair it took some getting used to, but its not like he is going to show up on RAW grey bearded or anything. This really wont matter much because when that gong hits you all know which guy is coming out & it aint f'n Santa Claus.

 

[ProWrestlingFan]

Meh "Deadman" gimmick lost its mystique years ago. He should return as ABA. That way he can retire as Mark Callaway and put into Hall of Fame in the next few years.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Meh "Deadman" gimmick lost its mystique years ago. He should return as ABA. That way he can retire as Mark Callaway and put into Hall of Fame in the next few years.

Can somebody call this guy a moron for me please?

Undertaker could be 70 and look as badass as he always looked in his career. Come his return he will deliver!

 

[babinko]

I don't get why no one admits that the guys time is almost near. You all are going to be disappointed when he comes back and he has a really shit match at Wrestlemania, then youll come back here and complain that he should have hung it up already. Even last year vs Punk, there was noticeable fatigue in that match and there were some spots he couldn't perform. The fact in this picture is he is looking way older than what he did last year. All of you dick-riding Taker fans probably are the same ones who complained that Hogan was wrestling at an old age but at least Hogans age didn't show as bad as Takers.

The fact is we live in a reality era. If this was 1990 or even early 2000s, these photos wouldn't even surface right away. The fact is that everyone is accessible to these photos and it even makes Taker winning at WM look unrealistic. He will be 49 at WM and in this picture he almost looks 70! I can't vision someone seeing this picture and think he could actually beat Brock.


Let this man Retire already.

 

[ProWrestlingFan]

Can somebody call this guy a moron for me please?

Undertaker could be 70 and look as badass as he always looked in his career. Come his return he will deliver!

Says the WWE apologist who wants attention. Why are you always quoting me on your posts? Go away. Did I struck a nerve on that Rock/Austin debate huh?

 

[ProWrestlingFan]

I don't get why no one admits that the guys time is almost near. You all are going to be disappointed when he comes back and he has a really shit match at Wrestlemania, then youll come back here and complain that he should have hung it up already. Even last year vs Punk, there was noticeable fatigue in that match and there were some spots he couldn't perform. The fact in this picture is he is looking way older than what he did last year. All of you dick-riding Taker fans probably are the same ones who complained that Hogan was wrestling at an old age but at least Hogans age didn't show as bad as Takers.

The fact is we live in a reality era. If this was 1990 or even early 2000s, these photos wouldn't even surface right away. The fact is that everyone is accessible to these photos and it even makes Taker winning at WM look unrealistic. He will be 49 at WM and in this picture he almost looks 70! I can't vision someone seeing this picture and think he could actually beat Brock.


Let this man Retire already.

Well said. Some of these guys are just ...marks.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Says the WWE apologist who wants attention. Why are you always quoting me on your posts? Go away. Did I struck a nerve on that Rock/Austin debate huh?

Yes, mainly the one that tells me how much I hate stupid people.

Also calling me a WWE apologist is a non-sense, since I pretty much watch every kind of wrestling out there. And I usually quote you, because I hate stupid people. We all have our "thing", mine is telling stupid people how stupid they really are. "Undertaker doesn't have mystique anymore. ABA should return" - that is non sense in every way you look at it.

Also his match with CM Punk was stellar. It was the best match on the show and it will most likely be again with Brock this year. The guy is a true professional, he wouldn't sign for that match if he knew he couldn't deliver. You'll be proven wrong once again you moron.

 

[ProWrestlingFan]

Yes, mainly the one that tells me how much I hate stupid people.

Also calling me a WWE apologist is a non-sense, since I pretty much watch every kind of wrestling out there. And I usually quote you, because I hate stupid people. We all have our "thing", mine is telling stupid people how stupid they really are. "Undertaker doesn't have mystique anymore. ABA should return" - that is non sense in every way you look at it.

Also his match with CM Punk was stellar. It was the best match on the show and it will most likely be again with Brock this year. The guy is a true professional, he wouldn't sign for that match if he knew he couldn't deliver. You'll be proven wrong once again you moron.

Undertaker vs CM Punk was mediocre and wasn't as good as the matches he had with HHH and Shawn Michales. "End of an Era" should have been his last match and he should have retired with a perfect record of 20-0.

Anyway, no, You are just a stupid guy with no life who takes wrestling and a wrestling forum too seriously. Go whine about how much "rep" you have on a forum like it means anything. Just fuck off and don't quote me again.

 

[smizzy]

I'm surprised.

Surprised he's wearing cargoes. What a geed.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Undertaker vs CM Punk was mediocre and wasn't as good as the matches he had with HHH and Shawn Michales. "End of an Era" should have been his last match and he should have retired with a perfect record of 20-0.

Anyway, no, You are just a stupid guy with no life who takes wrestling and a wrestling forum too seriously. Go whine about how much "rep" you have on a forum like it means anything. Just fuck off and don't quote me again.

"It wasn't as good" as three of the best matches of The Undertaker's 20+ year career. You do realize it's pretty hard to top that right? Specially in a classic wrestling match? And yet the match between CM Punk and Undertaker was anything but mediocre. It was storytelling at it's finest. It's not Taker's and Punk's fault that you are a dumbass who verbalizes and shares non-sense.

Also at this moment I'm a part of a wrestling website that makes me win some money on advertisements, so yeah, I should take some of my opinions seriously. Also I'm defending something I watch religiously for years now, and I say defending because you are obviously trying to turn that into shit. "Pro Wrestling Fan" it's different than "Shitty Pro Wrestling Fan", go ask the staff to change your name right now, and I'll stop quoting you.

 

[nightmare]

Anyway, no, You are just a stupid guy with no life who takes wrestling and a wrestling forum too seriously. Go whine about how much "rep" you have on a forum like it means anything. Just fuck off and don't quote me again.

Says the conceited gentleman who quoted himself in his sig....

 

[babinko]

Also his match with CM Punk was stellar. It was the best match on the show and it will most likely be again with Brock this year. The guy is a true professional, he wouldn't sign for that match if he knew he couldn't deliver. You'll be proven wrong once again you moron.

Dude that card was awful to begin with, of course it was the best match on the show based on the fact of the names; CM PUNK and UNDERTAKER. Rock vs Cena 2 and HHH/Brock just didn't bring the hype. I wouldn't be proud of a mediocre match being the best match on the card. Just admit it, Taker is old and he needs to retire soon. Let A new guy have that 30 minute time frame for his WM moment.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Dude that card was awful to begin with, of course it was the best match on the show based on the fact of the names; CM PUNK and UNDERTAKER. Rock vs Cena 2 and HHH/Brock just didn't bring the hype. I wouldn't be proud of a mediocre match being the best match on the card. Just admit it, Taker is old and he needs to retire soon. Let A new guy have that 30 minute time frame for his WM moment.

By far more intelligent people than you and me gave the match a **** 1/2 rating. The only issue with that match is that everyone knew the outcome, but everyone knew the outcomes to HBK and HHH matches too even before those happened so that is it.

 

[ProWrestlingFan]

Dude that card was awful to begin with, of course it was the best match on the show based on the fact of the names; CM PUNK and UNDERTAKER. Rock vs Cena 2 and HHH/Brock just didn't bring the hype. I wouldn't be proud of a mediocre match being the best match on the card. Just admit it, Taker is old and he needs to retire soon. Let A new guy have that 30 minute time frame for his WM moment.

Just ignore him. He probably doesn't even believe that the match was that great. He follows general IWC consensus. If some mod/admin of this forum said that match was great he will clinge on to that opinion and kiss their ass to get "rep". He is basically a bandwagoner, a sheep.

 

[Richard Blonoff]

Y'all mutha fuckas is childish.

 

[babinko]

Speaking of Mods, This should not be in the spam section and moved to the WWE section. This photo is bound to be posted on the WZ website later today and I'm sure more people will want to give their thoughts on it

 

[Richard Blonoff]

Speaking of Mods, This should not be in the spam section and moved to the WWE section. This photo is bound to be posted on the WZ website later today and I'm sure more people will want to give their thoughts on it

You will need to PM one of the WWE section mods and discuss that with them. I personally don't see the OP being a spam post, but WWE isn't my section, I have no real power there.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Just ignore him. He probably doesn't even believe that the match was that great. He follows general IWC consensus. If some mod/admin of this forum said that match was great he will clinge on to that opinion and kiss their ass to get "rep". He is basically a bandwagoner, a sheep.

Sure thing mate. However I was the one that strongly refuted that 2002-2003 were good years even though nobody agreed with me and got me a lot of "heat" in here. Also, I read KB's review on WM28 and he gave Lesnar/HHH the better grade, so I'm pretty sure I'm not kissing ass. I was also the one creating a thread about not getting Daniel Bryan and saying Cesaro isn't main event material. See?

 

[Dirk]

Horribly oversold picture. You don't want to end like "MMA-legend Tito Ortiz".

 

[Y 2 Jake]

Undertaker is a middle-aged man shocker!

 

[Jack-Hammer]

I honestly was a little surprised when I saw this yesterday. He looks like my uncle Doug, right down to the baseball cap.

This is the first picture I've seen of Taker in which he genuinely does look like an "old man" to me. He definitely looks a lot different than what we're used to. For the past few appearances, his face has been either clean shaven or his goatee's been kept extremely short. He's also not even remotely as buff as he was 4 or 5 years back but, then again, that was all before the wear & tear really caught up with him. If I didn't know he was legitimately about 6'8", I'd have guess he was only about 200, maybe 210pounds. He looks slimmer than I can ever recall seeing him. He's been billed at 299 pounds for about 10 years or so and, to me, he looks to be 240 pounds tops.

Ah well, get a little Just For Men, get him in his gear, sound the gong, drop the lights, hit the music and it'll be more than fine.