Being on TV doesn't make you mainstream. TNA is nothing but a glorified indy promotion with some really bad financial planners. lol I think the problem with indy is that people want it to succed without losing everything that made them like it the first place. But the problem is that a lot of indy feds are just incredibly bad: blood isn't an tool to sell a feud, you can count the amount of set spots in the match before you can count the facial expressions, and hardly any of the guys make an attempt connect with the audience.
I totally get what you're saying here and believe me I think TNA is a second rate organisation, no doubt but what I am saying is that the Motor City Machine Guns are one of the more watchable aspects of TNA, that's all.
Sure, they mightn't sell a move in the same manner as a WWE performer but to be frank, I don't care, I am a WWE fan first and foremost but sometimes I want something that isn't slow paced and based heavily on psycology and the Motor City Machine Guns absolutely provide that.
This isn't meant to be a WWE v TNA thread or an indy bashing thread, it's simply here to see what people think is the best aspect of TNA, that's it.
To be honest, I don't know. Individually, I think everything ranges from "crap" to "okay, I guess". But as a whole, the product as been really good in comparison to last year.
I largely share these views, but again, I'm saying the 'Guns are the exception for me....they are more than okay, they are exciting in my book and make sitting through 2 hours of Impact half bearable.
Er... I guess you missed the threads about how the iMPACT! Zone crowd needs to die. haha
I did miss them, oops!
To be honest, I don't see how anyone can take the reaction of the iMPACT! Zone serious. It is like there is a shopping list of things they have to react to: 1) flips and other really unneeded bull that the X-Division guys do. 2) chant "fire ____" at the first thing they don't like. 3) chant "boring" or "s/he can't wrestle" at someone they don't like. 4) whatever JB tells them to.
Maybe but still, they react in a very positive manner whenever the 'Guns perform and that cannot be ignored.
I feel ya. However, there's really no need to have a wrestling style that produces identical matches over and over and over and over and over. Then over some more. Especially when none of the guys have a character or an ounce of charisma. I guess people like Chris Sabin and Alex Shelly because they are 'cool', but I don't see how anyone can defend the MCMG's 'smarky' promos.
But that's wrestling for ya, the same could be said of WWE matches, it's the same slow build up every-single-time with an emphasis on selling and the like, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but the matches in WWE are very alike. I like Sabin and Shelley because of their in-ring style, I find it very exciting and again, it's refreshing to not always have to sit through the slow build ups I'm accustomed to with WWE's product, which can be a tad boring, dare I say.