No, Morgan should be compared to Khali, Eli Cottonwood, Giant Gonzalez.
Just becuase your tall does'nt mean your good.
Indeed this would be the case were he not very good, had he the mobility of an actual mobility scooter he might be eligible to join that list. Yet as he is a vastly superior talker/wrestler/total package than all of those guys, possibly combined, there isn't any reason to make such a ridiculous comparison is there?
Yes being tall doesn't make you instantly good. Well done. Everybody was still busy praising The Great Khali for his latest five star match weren't they? Matt Morgan is one of the best big guys of all time because:
1) Big guys which are booked for the sake of them being big usually aren't particularly good wrestlers. Matt Morgan isn't one of these types of guys. He has put on many the entertaining and good match with average guys despite the fact that height practically works against you when people consider how good of a wrestler you are, it's usually ideal to be closer to the 6ft mark if you are to look at some sort of correlation.
2) Big guys don't have a track record for being very good speakers for whichever reason. Kevin Nash, Big Show and Kane. These are the guys I think of as being good talkers that are in the same contingent, and none of them are even really stand out-ish. 7ft guys aren't rife in history because they aren't rife in reality but of them Matt Morgan is high on the list of at least solid talkers. Even Undertaker cannot really boast this.
Reality: - Matt Morgan is in his mid 30s now and this is already past the age of when people usually get pushed to the main event/have held a title. Now he has flirted with the main event a few times and looked good in the progress. The time to pick up the ball for him is rapidly approaching.
Now, I don't really care about the faces in the main event right now. You'd have to work pretty hard to convince me that RVD and the job he has been doing isn't easily replaceable for a younger, more deserving, more relevant guy. Even Anderson the way he has been performing recently is not really deserving of title, at least Morgan supplies you the in-ring ability and excitement for your money, and is far less injury prone.
What I now want: - Morgan to make short work of an ageless and ever-impressive Scott Steiner making him look exceptionally strong heading upwards. He then displaces Sting of the title giving us a guy who looks like he didn't lose another handful of hair that morning as champion. He really fits the bill.
NB - On a personal note I want him to stop paying everyone else more dues than they deserve when talking. He does this thing sometimes where his face almost says "fair enough". No Morgan it aint fair enough, you don't have to pretend a pratt like Eric Bischoff, get pissed off and get even. He has a very strange style on the mic but can at least speak fluently so I can often overlook some of his head-scratching promo work. In closing this all has to happen quite soon, fingers crossed.
And to the guy I quoted, phhh I know opinions are opinions but really? The fact he can lift both legs off the ground at one time immediately makes him better than all of those guys, I don't see your logic and I'm not even going to ask.