Madusa, also known as Alundra Blayze during her few years in the WWF, is a very famous womens wrestler. Not only for her talent, but for trashing the WWF Women's Championship belt on Monday Nitro.
But enough of history I'm sure we all know. The reason I made this thread was to get people's opinions on how well Madusa stacks up to the divas of the WWF. The reason I chose to put this here is that, while it does have to do with older wrestlers, I'm also looking to have Madusa compared against current WWE talent like Beth phoenix, Gail Kim, etc..
The thing that really got me interested in hearing a variety of views on this was that I mostly heard nothing but good things about Madusa's ability. While not the best wrestlers ever, she was one of the best to ever come out of North America. Yet during my search of this forum about topics where Madusa was discussed, I found a poster (I forget their name) who said Madusa simply couldn't work on the level of more recent divas like Trish or Lita.
Hence the topic. I've seen a fair share of Lita and Trish matches and I've also scowered YouTube for any Madusa/Alundra match. I really, personally, thought Madusa was a much better all-around than either of those two. I think Madusa was a total package of sorts. Good striker with her kicks, could mat wrestle and apply holds if she really wanted to, could do some high flying moves, decently fast and agile and quite strong for her size. (german suplexing Bull and Bertha can't be easy even if they do assist)
But hey, I haven't seen all of Trish's and Lita's matches. i could easily be missing something. I also do not really keep up with modern WWE wrestling. i hear a lot of good things about Natalya and them but I don't watch so I can't really compare.
So, that's my question to the good posters of this forum. How does the 3 time WWF Women's Champion stand up to the divas of the late 90s all the way to the current roster?
But enough of history I'm sure we all know. The reason I made this thread was to get people's opinions on how well Madusa stacks up to the divas of the WWF. The reason I chose to put this here is that, while it does have to do with older wrestlers, I'm also looking to have Madusa compared against current WWE talent like Beth phoenix, Gail Kim, etc..
The thing that really got me interested in hearing a variety of views on this was that I mostly heard nothing but good things about Madusa's ability. While not the best wrestlers ever, she was one of the best to ever come out of North America. Yet during my search of this forum about topics where Madusa was discussed, I found a poster (I forget their name) who said Madusa simply couldn't work on the level of more recent divas like Trish or Lita.
Hence the topic. I've seen a fair share of Lita and Trish matches and I've also scowered YouTube for any Madusa/Alundra match. I really, personally, thought Madusa was a much better all-around than either of those two. I think Madusa was a total package of sorts. Good striker with her kicks, could mat wrestle and apply holds if she really wanted to, could do some high flying moves, decently fast and agile and quite strong for her size. (german suplexing Bull and Bertha can't be easy even if they do assist)
But hey, I haven't seen all of Trish's and Lita's matches. i could easily be missing something. I also do not really keep up with modern WWE wrestling. i hear a lot of good things about Natalya and them but I don't watch so I can't really compare.
So, that's my question to the good posters of this forum. How does the 3 time WWF Women's Champion stand up to the divas of the late 90s all the way to the current roster?