Whenever I read this forum I sometimes get confused.
One day I will read it and there will be 20 post saying feuds are too long and boring (HHH-Orton)
Than the next day I will read 20 post saying feuds have no build up and end too quickly.
So I am wondering which do prefer actually prefer, Quick Feuds or lng built up threads.
IMO I think people want both, they want feuds that build up, but don't see the wrestlers in the feud wrestle each other every week.
I remember before Monday night Raw, when all you had were the 4 or 5 PPV's a year, than on Saturday afternoons you would get Superstars, which was basically the main stars involved in Squash mashes and doinf interviews to push there feud with whoever and than you would also get a Saturday Night main event here and there to help push the feud. And some of these feuds would last month and month, but no one got bored of them because the two guys feuding actually very seldom wrestled each other except on the big PPV
These days with shows like Raw and Smackdown, where it is no longer Big name superstar vs Jobber match after match like the old Superstar TV show, they now have to put PPV quality matches on regular TV plus the 12-13 PPVS a year, it is no longer special when two Superstars meet at a PPV, because we've all seen it a million times by then.
So after my rambling what I really would like to know is if people want things to stay pretty well like they are now with RAW-SMACKDOWN and 12-13 PPV's a year, or would you prefer the old days with only 4-5 PPV matches a year and none of the big name superstars actually wrestling each other on regular TV.
One day I will read it and there will be 20 post saying feuds are too long and boring (HHH-Orton)
Than the next day I will read 20 post saying feuds have no build up and end too quickly.
So I am wondering which do prefer actually prefer, Quick Feuds or lng built up threads.
IMO I think people want both, they want feuds that build up, but don't see the wrestlers in the feud wrestle each other every week.
I remember before Monday night Raw, when all you had were the 4 or 5 PPV's a year, than on Saturday afternoons you would get Superstars, which was basically the main stars involved in Squash mashes and doinf interviews to push there feud with whoever and than you would also get a Saturday Night main event here and there to help push the feud. And some of these feuds would last month and month, but no one got bored of them because the two guys feuding actually very seldom wrestled each other except on the big PPV
These days with shows like Raw and Smackdown, where it is no longer Big name superstar vs Jobber match after match like the old Superstar TV show, they now have to put PPV quality matches on regular TV plus the 12-13 PPVS a year, it is no longer special when two Superstars meet at a PPV, because we've all seen it a million times by then.
So after my rambling what I really would like to know is if people want things to stay pretty well like they are now with RAW-SMACKDOWN and 12-13 PPV's a year, or would you prefer the old days with only 4-5 PPV matches a year and none of the big name superstars actually wrestling each other on regular TV.