I typed this response for a thread, but when I tried to post it, the thread had already been deleted by a mod, haha. But I was proud of what I wrote, and I'd like to see your ideas about it.
Here's what I wrote:
-----------
I do like your argument about the overall representation of women in wrestling. That sort of thing really interests me. Whileas in the past "divas" were pretty much 100% sex symbols, what with bra and panty matches and stuff, lately, with the "PG Era" and with Cole interrupting their matches, the WWE seems to be saying that women aren't even sex objects anymore; they're something to push aside, to make room for "more important things"-- in this case, an argument between two powerful old men (Lawler and Cole). That's kind of problematic, when taken outside of the WWE Universe and put in the larger perspective of modern American society, don't you think? Kharma, therefore, is really fascinating to me, because I think practically everyone is taking interest in her; she kind of resembles a "riot grrrl" feminist in my mind, the way she's forcefully directing attention back to the female side of things, even if her method of doing so is not universally respected, and even if it's feared by many. She seems like a progressive character in this respect so far, and so to Kharma, I say "you go girl"
------------
Do you agree with my analysis of the WWE's representation of women and Kharma's role in possibly deconstructing it?
What do you think the overarching representation of women in the WWE is? Assess it: is it problematic? Realistic?
Why do you think the WWE chooses to represent women in this way (demographics might play a role in your answer)?
Are there any other groups of people (e.g. African Americans) where you see another possibly problematic portrayal coming from the WWE?
Any other things you'd like to share? Any other things you think the WWE could do to change the messages they project?
Do you think this topic is cool?
Here's what I wrote:
-----------
I do like your argument about the overall representation of women in wrestling. That sort of thing really interests me. Whileas in the past "divas" were pretty much 100% sex symbols, what with bra and panty matches and stuff, lately, with the "PG Era" and with Cole interrupting their matches, the WWE seems to be saying that women aren't even sex objects anymore; they're something to push aside, to make room for "more important things"-- in this case, an argument between two powerful old men (Lawler and Cole). That's kind of problematic, when taken outside of the WWE Universe and put in the larger perspective of modern American society, don't you think? Kharma, therefore, is really fascinating to me, because I think practically everyone is taking interest in her; she kind of resembles a "riot grrrl" feminist in my mind, the way she's forcefully directing attention back to the female side of things, even if her method of doing so is not universally respected, and even if it's feared by many. She seems like a progressive character in this respect so far, and so to Kharma, I say "you go girl"
------------
Do you agree with my analysis of the WWE's representation of women and Kharma's role in possibly deconstructing it?
What do you think the overarching representation of women in the WWE is? Assess it: is it problematic? Realistic?
Why do you think the WWE chooses to represent women in this way (demographics might play a role in your answer)?
Are there any other groups of people (e.g. African Americans) where you see another possibly problematic portrayal coming from the WWE?
Any other things you'd like to share? Any other things you think the WWE could do to change the messages they project?
Do you think this topic is cool?