Ambiguous Turd
Mid-Card Championship Winner
I've heard some people saying this since Matt Striker came in and took Ross' place on Smackdown. Other people bounced back. But I have to agree that maybe it's time for Jim Ross to hang em up in WWE.
When I listen to JR and Todd Grisham, I essentially hear two Play by Play commentators talking. It's obvious that Grisham is supposed to be the Play by Play, but Ross just can't seem to quite understand that his new role is supposed to be the Analyst. I suppose this is challenging for him, but the man is a professional and his been in the business for about 3 decades.
The role of the Color Commentator has changed, which should be even easier for Jim Ross. Not that I am a fan of this, but as we know, Color Commentators are gone and now Analysts are in. Essentially, all the Analyst has to do is take over what the Play by Play commentators also used to do, by providing depth into the feuds and certain wrestlers.
Striker does the best job at this role compared to any of his other Co-Analysts, including Jerry Lawler.
When I listen to Grisham and Striker, I hear a cohesive unit that has their act together. Each commentator seems to understand their role and function properly. Plus, Grisham can be often times sarcastic, and Striker plays off him perfectly, as opposed to Ross who many times will often ignore Grisham when Grisham tries to be funny. Striker, can also be sarcastic, and Grisham plays well off him.
As much as I am not a fan of this concept of Play by Play commentators and Analysts, this duo seems to come off as possibly being the best of the bunch so far. I'll listen more in the coming weeks. But at the same time, I heard their work on ECW together and enjoyed them at that time, as well.
It's no secret that Ross is nearing the end of his broadcasting career. He's been the voice of Raw for well over 10 years. He's done Smackdown, but Smackdown actually seems to function better without him.
It may be best at this point to stick Ross on ECW in place of Matthews, or simply make the man a Full-time interviewer. That actually is a concept that I feel is worth exploring. I have been very adamant ever since he left many years ago for WCW, that what WWE needs is another "Mean Gene Okerlund" ..... and I feel that Jim Ross would be a perfect candidate for that role. Actually an interviewer with some personality, who's character is not afraid to challenge guests on answers.
In addition to that, he can also do what Gene Okerlund used to do and be used to hype PPV's.
But I feel this would be an excellent position for the man on any of the broadcasts (unless they just use him for this role on Raw) .... and would fill that void of a Name Interviewer that WWE has needed for so long.
But I feel it's time to get Jim Ross out of the booth. He's simply done it long enough.
When I listen to JR and Todd Grisham, I essentially hear two Play by Play commentators talking. It's obvious that Grisham is supposed to be the Play by Play, but Ross just can't seem to quite understand that his new role is supposed to be the Analyst. I suppose this is challenging for him, but the man is a professional and his been in the business for about 3 decades.
The role of the Color Commentator has changed, which should be even easier for Jim Ross. Not that I am a fan of this, but as we know, Color Commentators are gone and now Analysts are in. Essentially, all the Analyst has to do is take over what the Play by Play commentators also used to do, by providing depth into the feuds and certain wrestlers.
Striker does the best job at this role compared to any of his other Co-Analysts, including Jerry Lawler.
When I listen to Grisham and Striker, I hear a cohesive unit that has their act together. Each commentator seems to understand their role and function properly. Plus, Grisham can be often times sarcastic, and Striker plays off him perfectly, as opposed to Ross who many times will often ignore Grisham when Grisham tries to be funny. Striker, can also be sarcastic, and Grisham plays well off him.
As much as I am not a fan of this concept of Play by Play commentators and Analysts, this duo seems to come off as possibly being the best of the bunch so far. I'll listen more in the coming weeks. But at the same time, I heard their work on ECW together and enjoyed them at that time, as well.
It's no secret that Ross is nearing the end of his broadcasting career. He's been the voice of Raw for well over 10 years. He's done Smackdown, but Smackdown actually seems to function better without him.
It may be best at this point to stick Ross on ECW in place of Matthews, or simply make the man a Full-time interviewer. That actually is a concept that I feel is worth exploring. I have been very adamant ever since he left many years ago for WCW, that what WWE needs is another "Mean Gene Okerlund" ..... and I feel that Jim Ross would be a perfect candidate for that role. Actually an interviewer with some personality, who's character is not afraid to challenge guests on answers.
In addition to that, he can also do what Gene Okerlund used to do and be used to hype PPV's.
But I feel this would be an excellent position for the man on any of the broadcasts (unless they just use him for this role on Raw) .... and would fill that void of a Name Interviewer that WWE has needed for so long.
But I feel it's time to get Jim Ross out of the booth. He's simply done it long enough.