"Cool Guy" Jensen
Undertaker for Champ!
I'm one of the last people in the world who can say that I know all there is to know about politics. However, at a very young age (about 4 or 5), I became interested in the U.S. Presidents. I made it a goal of mine to first know all the names, then their amount of years in office, and whatever else I could learn. That did not happen until I was around 7 or 8 years old. Now, I know all the presidents, their terms, the first lady, some of their vice presidents, their political party, and some of the things they did during their presidencies.
Despite the fact that I may or may not know about U.S. Presidential trivia. And I have a pretty good idea of how good or bad each president was, is it really appropriate to say that a person's political knowledge cannot be strong enough because of young age?
I mean, I've only been alive during the presidencies of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and now Barack Obama, but I try to learn as much as I can about them along with the rest of the presidents. Is the only way for someone to really believe your political knowledge is if you are experienced and witness everything firsthand?
Despite the fact that I may or may not know about U.S. Presidential trivia. And I have a pretty good idea of how good or bad each president was, is it really appropriate to say that a person's political knowledge cannot be strong enough because of young age?
I mean, I've only been alive during the presidencies of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and now Barack Obama, but I try to learn as much as I can about them along with the rest of the presidents. Is the only way for someone to really believe your political knowledge is if you are experienced and witness everything firsthand?