Impact Support Club House | Page 150 | WrestleZone Forums

Impact Support Club House

Never say never.

The likelihood is very very slim.

What are people's thoughts on Angelina Love leaving. I mean I know she was off with having a baby but even before I'd been meh on her for a while. If she wants to focus on her kid fair play to her though
 
I'm fine with it. I've always liked her, but they need to focus on a whole new crop of Knockouts, which they seem to be doing right now. She'd be lost in the shuffle.
 
Hire enough knockouts and bring back the tag titles. Make them a focus of the show every other week along with the main Knockouts title. The Knockouts are another selling point TNA needs to refocus on. Give Love/Sky one reign then have put talent over until their contracts expire so they can go on with life outside of TNA.
 
Seriously. I didn't watch Wrestlemania, but I just finished the Rangers game and was like "eh, fuck it, let's see what's going on..."

Boom. Miz. Boom. Channel changed.
 
It's kind of weird to hear someone who is an admitted fan of Eric fucking Young shit all over a guy who is objectively better than Eric Young in every fathomable way.
 
AJ Styles is the number one contender.

Saw that, actually. Ended up flipping back over with like three minutes left. Saw the finish. Happy for him. Seemed like a fun match with Owens, Cesaro and Jericho.

It's kind of weird to hear someone who is an admitted fan of Eric fucking Young shit all over a guy who is objectively better than Eric Young in every fathomable way.

Yeah, that's not objective. It's subjective.

Me seeing the Miz on my television is like me running across a skunk in the wild. I'm not sticking around. Not even for a second. I'm off like a bullet in the opposite direction in the hopes that none of the stink got on me.

There's been a handful of guys in the business who caused me to have that kind of negative guttural reaction. Most recently, along with Miz, that list includes Ryback, Big Show and Heath Slater. Instant channel changers.
 
I feel you on the Miz, IDR. He can stay off my TV the same way Jeff Jarret can.

I guess some independent wrestler filed a cease and desist letter against TNA. It is Justin "Krimson" Carnes who sent the letter to TNA. He feels as if Joker Sting along with The Decay are ideas taking from him. These ideas that supposedly originated from Heath Ledgers Joker character from the Batman movie. Not sure if I buy into it personally but Justin "Krimson" Carnes seems pretty upset over these situations.

I know this was discussed during the Joker Sting days in TNA but it seemed to have gone away. Well until now that is. This Krimson guy seems to have or could have some validity behind what he is saying. I mean, TNA has been known to be very unoriginal at times so these two concepts could have been permanently borrowed from Krimson. TNA has declined the cease to desist letters stating clowns have been in wrestling for a long time and their ideas do not steem off of what Krimson has done in the past or doing currently. Not the best answer but TNA is the worst at giving good answers to questions like these.
 
I agree with you The Phenomenal Matrix. Crazzy Steve is better in this role. Abyss is interesting again but he should not be losing and looking weak.

Billy Corgan needs to stay off TV. He is not helping the show at all on screen wise. Also, the way the camera angle was during his time on stage was awful. I looked at the TV wondering why I can see up his (Billy's) nose? It was just a minor thing but something major TNA needs to focus on.

The show was good but lacked substance. It felt like a going through the motions type of show. Not bad but not the greatest. TNA needs to be consistently great for it to regain viewers. If they are doing a good show this week and a shit show the next, a lost fan won't be interested in wanting to watch. They would probably feel like TNA still has not changed their ways. Here is to hoping they can rebound to keep the show consistent on a weekly basis.

Also, JR said TNA needs to change their name. I agree as I thought the whole point of Mick Foley making a big commotion of the new Impact Wrestling name was for a brand name change. I was wrong but Impact Wrestling sounds so much better than Total Non-Stop Action Impact Wrestling...that is a mouthful to say for sure.
 
Billy Corgan has charisma. Dixie Carter doesn't. That instantly makes him better than Dixie.

Also I have a feeling Dixie is going to kill TNA by refusing to give up a controlling share. I reckon some possible investors could turn the company around (stranger things have happened) but Dixie refusing to give up a controlling stake in her play thing is what will kill it
 
Also I have a feeling Dixie is going to kill TNA by refusing to give up a controlling share. I reckon some possible investors could turn the company around (stranger things have happened) but Dixie refusing to give up a controlling stake in her play thing is what will kill it
I made a post about this in the TNA section, but, if TNA is currently seeking a cash infusion, the following apply:

-No one, based on TNA's performance over the past five years, would be giving TNA money with the expectation of getting a better return on investment than the market index.
-The Magic Panda Money Fairy idea has been debunked so many times, but the quick version is that Panda Energy has other investors besides the Carter family, and if these other investors feel that their money is not being spent wisely, they'll invest it elsewhere. They won't weaken their position in their overwhelmingly primary focus, the design, development, and maintenance of power plants, in order to prop up TNA with do or die money. This was a large part of the reason TNA was spun off from Panda Energy a couple years back.
-This being in mind, I can see two types of buyers for TNA: A) someone with too much money for their own good who wants to get involved in professional wrestling (don't laugh, just go to Wikipedia and read about Ted Turner and Dixie Carter), or B) a production company or television network looking for content (much like the ROH/Sinclair deal).

Case A: This person (or group) would insist upon control, because why else buy a professional wrestling company for fun? Would you give someone several million dollars and then get slightly more than the backstage VIP package in return? Did Dixie? There is no rational buyer in this group who would invest in TNA without a controlling interest in the company.

Case B: The production values of professional wrestling are too much for a niche channel to pick up on their own, when you can just send a camera team out with hunters, mechanics, antique sale farmers, package that up and call it a show. So you're looking at either the large companies (your Comcast/NBC, Fox, or Viacom types), or a syndicated distribution network like Sinclair Broadcasting, which sells programming to local stations. The first group is an unlikely buyer, because there's no need to assume the risk of ownership when you can simply purchase the programming. (See the sad, sad tale of Time Warner.) The second group is also unlikely- I can't think of any distribution networks of the size that wouldn't reduce TNA's audience even further and end up killing it that way- but would likely insist upon ownership control so that they can both keep production costs below what the show brings in with sales (see: ROH), and be able to hold onto the show should it end up proving successful.

-I cannot think of any other reason, or any other someone, who would give TNA money without insisting upon substantial control over the company, and that includes if they were fucking Dixie Carter.

So all that being said and taken into account, if TNA is in need of operations money and Dixie refuses to give up controlling interest for it, they're then forced to reduce expenses even farther in order to stay within budget- meaning less money for talent, less money for production, and hence lower ratings, threatening their deal with PopTV. If the money isn't there to produce for PopTV, it won't be there to produce for another company- hence, their interest in controlling ownership.

The absolute worst case scenario is that TNA doesn't have the funds and can't get the credit to hold a TV taping, bills it as a postponement until a 'later date', and that later date never happens. For all the negative (but valid) things I've had to say about TNA's business operations over the years, I really don't see them making the decision to cancel a TV taping simply to cut their losses, so this is a pretty drastic scenario.

If you were to slice it with Occam's Razor, the most likely situation in the absence of a buyer is that they finish delivering programming throughout their PopTV run and cease operations after that. It no longer becomes a game of TV Channel Roulette when you can't afford to make the programming in the first place. But professional wrestling is a weird business where people don't necessarily act in their own best interests.
 
Something great needs to happen to TNA. The promotion could be so much more than the little engine that could.
 
Something drastic, more like. Even the optimist in me knows the TNA brand is almost certainly dead.

Whomever the investor/owner is, the first step is publicly exorcising Dixie Carter and TNA's upper management group. Even if she retains some kind of ownership stake behind the scenes. She's the face of failure, and when you look at the hard numbers — averaging two million viewers just three years ago and struggling to average three hundred thousand these days — there's no reconciling this.

If your accountant took $2M and dwindled it down to $300K, even if you are willing to pump more money into the venture, are you really going to give it to that same fucking accountant?

I believe Dixie Carter is a nice person. I believe she cares. But I also believe she's not the leader she believes she is, and her public perception is as poor as it can be. I believe she's a legitimate hurdle to TNA's success. Both her involvement (again, she's the face of failure), and her insistence on being an on-screen character doesn't help matters at all considering how bad an actor she is.

The second step should be re-naming the company and completely rebranding, top to bottom.

The third should be refocusing the product itself on superior in-ring wrestling, not badly acted story-telling. There's enough talent on the roster right now to accomplish this. Take the product you see now and cut the talking and nonsense down by no less than 50%. Remember "Wrestling Matters Here"? Yeah, go back to that.
 
X Division, Tag Division, Knockouts then World Title.

To me this is what TNA needs to focus on in ring wise. I put the world title last since there are enough main event talent for the world title scene. The other divisions are in need of help. Make them fresh whike having a real alternative product.

TNA needs to distinguish itself from the awful aura of being WWE lite.

Basically, what IDR said.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top