Or so it is said. Anywhooo.
Academic qualifications are commonly felt to give a person the best chance of success in life. How far is this true?
Whether one is proposing marriage, applying for a job or looking for a new business partner, the first thing people ask is, "what do you do?" In other words, they judge you by your academic qualifications. No bio-data résumé or curriculum vitae is acceptable without the inclusion of education qualifications. Therefore it is an unannounced rule of both the corporate world and the social world that a man's acquisition of academic qualifications is a giant leap towards opportunities in every walk of life. How much is this logic founded in reality?
The definition of success differs from person to person and field to field. One could take economic success as a touchstone to label a person successful in life, ignoring his of her other failures, like divorce, health, inefficiency, etc. Others may look at a capacity for overcoming challenges, irrespective of what someone earns and the nature of their private life. Soooooo....
Who is a successful person and who is a failure? Do school and college grades and examination results provide a way of predicting or ensuring future success? If that is true, then we should encourage as many young people as possible to go to university and work hard to gain formal qualifications. But is it true? After all, some college drop-outs like Bill Gates and Richard Branson are hugely successful icons of success. Should we automatically consider the millions of young people who have not had the opportunity to gain academic certificates to be failures in life?
You dont have to answer all of the questions, but you get the idea. Have fun.
Academic qualifications are commonly felt to give a person the best chance of success in life. How far is this true?
Whether one is proposing marriage, applying for a job or looking for a new business partner, the first thing people ask is, "what do you do?" In other words, they judge you by your academic qualifications. No bio-data résumé or curriculum vitae is acceptable without the inclusion of education qualifications. Therefore it is an unannounced rule of both the corporate world and the social world that a man's acquisition of academic qualifications is a giant leap towards opportunities in every walk of life. How much is this logic founded in reality?
The definition of success differs from person to person and field to field. One could take economic success as a touchstone to label a person successful in life, ignoring his of her other failures, like divorce, health, inefficiency, etc. Others may look at a capacity for overcoming challenges, irrespective of what someone earns and the nature of their private life. Soooooo....
Who is a successful person and who is a failure? Do school and college grades and examination results provide a way of predicting or ensuring future success? If that is true, then we should encourage as many young people as possible to go to university and work hard to gain formal qualifications. But is it true? After all, some college drop-outs like Bill Gates and Richard Branson are hugely successful icons of success. Should we automatically consider the millions of young people who have not had the opportunity to gain academic certificates to be failures in life?
You dont have to answer all of the questions, but you get the idea. Have fun.