TNA obviously can't live from WWE and WCW's scraps forever. Actually, maybe they can. John Cena's got become past it one day! But in this thread, operate under the assumption that TNA can't rely on almost-weres and has-beens from other companies; that TNA must push and develop talent from within.
Who can you see leading the company into the future?
Who can't you see leading the company into the future (besides Sting and co.)?
What are the specific roles that specific people should have?
Let's get the obvious out of the way first. Of course, AJ is the obvious choice for a reason - he's damn good and the fans know it. Always a little bland, a prolonged soak in TNA's patented silly sauce has imbued him with a little character and, after some initial doubts, I believe that AJ is ready to be a permanent fixture at the forefront of the company.
Definitely a more potent heel than a face, he'd likely be a pretty good chaser, picking up the belt to make big occasions that much bigger. I think chain-winning Bound For Glory main events is something that should go with Sting though. Problem is, how long can AJ hold his risk-taking style before he just becomes a Rey Mysterio? Will we still need him when he's sixty-four?
I've never made a secret of it that Shelley is a personal favourite of mine. Despite what TNA's internal operations have had to say, he's also come across as a pretty nice guy - it's my theory that everyone else are bell ends. I'd describe him as Dean Malenko if he had much more structure, youth and creativity. A thrill on the mic and in the ring, he's one that TNA should not waste. He needs more free reign.
Definitely more versatile as far as face/heel alignment goes than AJ. However, heel is definitely where he feels most natural - he's Jerichoesque, you could say. Always a transitional champion, never the authentic figurehead, methinks. So very Jerichoesque indeed.
Yes, indeedy. Another bona fide Sam favourite, this guy. Nothing like Shelley, nothing like AJ. A man that has had TNA's most underrated midcard matches ever, but has never been able to pull himself out of the tag division. Still, just because you were part of an awesome tag tandem doesn't mean you can't have singles success - just ask Bret Hart.
I've always thought that Storm would be great as TNA's Edge (and plenty of parallels can be drawn between them already - opportunistic yet dominant. I thought he was a decent tweener for the two weeks he was one. Still, being "TNA's Edge", a heel is what his place is. I can imagine he could have some longish reigns with some surprising beginnings and endings. Would be great for guys like AJ to work off.
I grow tired now, so I'll quickly do who isn't TNA's future:
Grouped into one due to how similar I consider their poor points to be. They'll always get a decent pop but that's just because they can do flips. They're very much both unremarkable cruiserweights, especially Kaz. Them getting too big for their boots wouldn't much help anyone.
Who can you see leading the company into the future?
Who can't you see leading the company into the future (besides Sting and co.)?
What are the specific roles that specific people should have?
AJ Styles
Let's get the obvious out of the way first. Of course, AJ is the obvious choice for a reason - he's damn good and the fans know it. Always a little bland, a prolonged soak in TNA's patented silly sauce has imbued him with a little character and, after some initial doubts, I believe that AJ is ready to be a permanent fixture at the forefront of the company.
Definitely a more potent heel than a face, he'd likely be a pretty good chaser, picking up the belt to make big occasions that much bigger. I think chain-winning Bound For Glory main events is something that should go with Sting though. Problem is, how long can AJ hold his risk-taking style before he just becomes a Rey Mysterio? Will we still need him when he's sixty-four?
Alex Shelley
I've never made a secret of it that Shelley is a personal favourite of mine. Despite what TNA's internal operations have had to say, he's also come across as a pretty nice guy - it's my theory that everyone else are bell ends. I'd describe him as Dean Malenko if he had much more structure, youth and creativity. A thrill on the mic and in the ring, he's one that TNA should not waste. He needs more free reign.
Definitely more versatile as far as face/heel alignment goes than AJ. However, heel is definitely where he feels most natural - he's Jerichoesque, you could say. Always a transitional champion, never the authentic figurehead, methinks. So very Jerichoesque indeed.
James Storm
Yes, indeedy. Another bona fide Sam favourite, this guy. Nothing like Shelley, nothing like AJ. A man that has had TNA's most underrated midcard matches ever, but has never been able to pull himself out of the tag division. Still, just because you were part of an awesome tag tandem doesn't mean you can't have singles success - just ask Bret Hart.
I've always thought that Storm would be great as TNA's Edge (and plenty of parallels can be drawn between them already - opportunistic yet dominant. I thought he was a decent tweener for the two weeks he was one. Still, being "TNA's Edge", a heel is what his place is. I can imagine he could have some longish reigns with some surprising beginnings and endings. Would be great for guys like AJ to work off.
I grow tired now, so I'll quickly do who isn't TNA's future:
Kaz and Christopher Daniels
Grouped into one due to how similar I consider their poor points to be. They'll always get a decent pop but that's just because they can do flips. They're very much both unremarkable cruiserweights, especially Kaz. Them getting too big for their boots wouldn't much help anyone.