Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah rowingisgod, even I know WWE's in-ring stuff are better than what TNA is putting on. Might not blow TNA out of the water, it's close, but TNA's in-ring stuff are not as good/lenghty than WWE's. Don't get me wrong, TNA does have great matches every now and then, but they're not focused on them. Hopefully things will start changing and TNA will get back to kicking WWE's ass as far as in-ring stuff go once more.That's the biggest load of horseshit I've read in quite some time. Anyone with even the slightest semblance of objectivity can tell that the WWE is CLEARLY miles ahead of TNA when it comes to in-ring product, for various reasons. WWE has much more programming per week, so you get way more quality matches on TV in a week than you do on Impact in a month, not to mention WWE's PPVs blow TNA PPVs right the fuck out of the water when it comes to in-ring work. Fuck just look at last week in the WWE, you had a damn good 10 minute title match on RAW between Cena and Miz, you had two good 10 minute plus matches on Superstars, and then you had an awesome 20 minute main event on Smackdown. As opposed to TNA last week which had....what again? Oh right, the usual 4 minute matches that never get any time to develop whatsoever. And when it comes to PPV? Please, not even a contest. Extreme Rules was better than any PPV TNA has had in a long, long, LONG time. Easily better than any PPV that TNA has had since the Fall of 2009. WWE Superstars on average features far more in-ring wrestling than Impact does each week, and that's WWE's C-show, which is half the length that Impact is.
There are plenty of things to like about TNA, but trying to claim the in-ring product is better is so laughably incorrect that I nearly spit up my coffee while reading your post.
no you were merely butthurt and decided to use the same two sad tactics we have all seen time and time again. in case you forgot them, reread my post. dont backstep now and try to ignore you called me out by saying: i was merely directing you to the thread title.
lol im 36 and ive seen it all. on top of that wrestling sucks ass and has, for at the very least, 8 years now. so my days of being a "watch every week and be emotionally invested enough to buy ppv's" days are probably over. when your 36 see how much time you can find to squeeze in wrestling shows full of stars you dont really care about...and for promotions who care even less about themselves. pwr puts out about 3 hrs a week of content and its nice to listen to while doing dishes or yardwork instead of having to sit and suffer through 20 minute long boring promos...and even those spend half of their time needlessly retelling what happened last week. half of every show today is just replays of last week.
anyway, you know youve won a discussion when the person turns away from the topic and talks about what wwe does and then personally attacks you. so thank you. youve been extremely typical in your responses, its like you tna supporters are all cut with the same cookie cutter and are fed the same lines to use over and over.
That's the biggest load of horseshit I've read in quite some time. Anyone with even the slightest semblance of objectivity can tell that the WWE is CLEARLY miles ahead of TNA when it comes to in-ring product, for various reasons. WWE has much more programming per week, so you get way more quality matches on TV in a week than you do on Impact in a month, not to mention WWE's PPVs blow TNA PPVs right the fuck out of the water when it comes to in-ring work. Fuck just look at last week in the WWE, you had a damn good 10 minute title match on RAW between Cena and Miz, you had two good 10 minute plus matches on Superstars, and then you had an awesome 20 minute main event on Smackdown. As opposed to TNA last week which had....what again? Oh right, the usual 4 minute matches that never get any time to develop whatsoever. And when it comes to PPV? Please, not even a contest. Extreme Rules was better than any PPV TNA has had in a long, long, LONG time. Easily better than any PPV that TNA has had since the Fall of 2009. WWE Superstars on average features far more in-ring wrestling than Impact does each week, and that's WWE's C-show, which is half the length that Impact is.
There are plenty of things to like about TNA, but trying to claim the in-ring product is better is so laughably incorrect that I nearly spit up my coffee while reading your post.
I like TNA too MrHashasheen. I also agree with those who have stated TNA's in-ring product is better than the WWE's. That's nothing new though, in the 80's JCP blew the WWF's in ring product out of the water, in the 90's WCW did likewise and in the 00's it's been TNA. Yeah yeah great, McMahon has super duper billion dollar production values.
Awesome story bros, the only problem is he handicaps his in ring talent. Sorry, the formula of a wrestler having 5 moves they have to hit each match with little to zero deviation isn't good, isn't cool and doesn't hold a candle to most of the matches you get in TNA. If you enjoy it? Hey great! I'm glad someone does.
But back to TNA. Yep, I enjoy it. I enjoy the promo work, I enjoy the matches, I enjoy the vastly superior to WWE talent they have on their roster. I enjoy their tag teams, I enjoy their Knockouts who can actually work in the ring. I find them overall to be an enjoyable product. I didn't used to and there are some things I don't enjoy about it but overall I like them and what they bring to the table. While i'm not thrilled about the new name and new look I am interested in seeing where they plan to go with this rebrand and new attitude.
Do you really think discussing movesets in TNA v. WWE is a good argument? Really?
Need I mention?
Sting
AJ
Nash
Angle
Hardy (both)
Scott Steiner
Those guys all use the same movesets, and have for years now, over and over and over with no deviation.
Please, try again.
Man that is poor. I see you write some complete shit about TNA and this is right up there.
Sting I never thought he was about having loads of moves. I thought he was more about the psychological side of things. And the aura that surrounds him as a wrestler.
AJ This is just dumb and suggests to me that you dont watch TNA. AJ can wrestle any style you want him to. Technical, mat, high flying, chain, submission, brawling, hardcore etc.
Nash Hes not even in TNA.
Angle Is this guy not the best wrestler in the World? Kurt Angle could have an awesome 25 minute match with anyone who could keep up.
Hardy (both) Ill give you Jeff, he seems to always do the same moves, but people love him so theres no harm in having ONE guy that does the same 5 moves over and over. Matt, on the other hand, has shown he can work a variety of styles and holds.
Scott Steiner I thought he was a dude that cut hilarious promos and beat people up?
So, please, try again.
Actually I watch TNA every week and I pay attention. We're talking movesets here, not a wrestlers ability to adapt to different styles based on their opponent. Within the breakdown of a match, each of those men I listed use the same movesets within each match they compete in.
So I've proven that I'm right and all you were able to do was to curse me for the facts I provided.
Guess what that means?
I win, you lose.
That's the biggest load of horseshit I've read in quite some time. Anyone with even the slightest semblance of objectivity can tell that the WWE is CLEARLY miles ahead of TNA when it comes to in-ring product, for various reasons.
WWE has much more programming per week, so you get way more quality matches on TV in a week than you do on Impact in a month, not to mention WWE's PPVs blow TNA PPVs right the fuck out of the water when it comes to in-ring work.
Fuck just look at last week in the WWE, you had a damn good 10 minute title match on RAW between Cena and Miz, you had two good 10 minute plus matches on Superstars, and then you had an awesome 20 minute main event on Smackdown.
As opposed to TNA last week which had....what again? Oh right, the usual 4 minute matches that never get any time to develop whatsoever.
And when it comes to PPV? Please, not even a contest. Extreme Rules was better than any PPV TNA has had in a long, long, LONG time. Easily better than any PPV that TNA has had since the Fall of 2009.
WWE Superstars on average features far more in-ring wrestling than Impact does each week, and that's WWE's C-show, which is half the length that Impact is.
There are plenty of things to like about TNA, but trying to claim the in-ring product is better is so laughably incorrect that I nearly spit up my coffee while reading your post.
How old are you son? Its not about winning or losing.
Of course they use the same moveset in their matches. Thats why its called a moveset isnt it? Its set to that wrestler. But it certainly isnt restricted to 5 moves. The point I was making is they are not some generic guy that anyone could replace. They all offer much more and much more than 5 moves.
And that't the biggest thing TNA can offer over the WWE, idividual characters that are interesting. There's been a lot of debate lately about the actual wrestling and quality of it, in both companies. I haven't watched any WWE for a couple of years so can't comment on their present in ring product. But I'm not going to sit here and say I didn't see some good matches when I did watch it, but I couldn't care less who won those matches (unless it was Undertaker). So ultimately I didn't see the point in watching it anymore. And that's what makes TNA good and makes me like it, I care about who wins the matches.
no you were merely butthurt and decided to use the same two sad tactics we have all seen time and time again. in case you forgot them, reread my post. dont backstep now and try to ignore you called me out by saying: i was merely directing you to the thread title.
lol im 36 and ive seen it all. on top of that wrestling sucks ass and has, for at the very least, 8 years now. so my days of being a "watch every week and be emotionally invested enough to buy ppv's" days are probably over. when your 36 see how much time you can find to squeeze in wrestling shows full of stars you dont really care about...and for promotions who care even less about themselves. pwr puts out about 3 hrs a week of content and its nice to listen to while doing dishes or yardwork instead of having to sit and suffer through 20 minute long boring promos...and even those spend half of their time needlessly retelling what happened last week. half of every show today is just replays of last week.
anyway, you know youve won a discussion when the person turns away from the topic and talks about what wwe does and then personally attacks you. so thank you. youve been extremely typical in your responses, its like you tna supporters are all cut with the same cookie cutter and are fed the same lines to use over and over.
