Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah, and Hogan doesn't go falling of gigantic f***ing cages to get over now does he? He just flexes his wrinkled tits at the audience and "hulks up!" Besides, the next time Hogan takes 20+ chairshots to the head or gets slammed onto tacks, then maybe I'll give ol' Terry his due. Not that I think Hulk was never good, but he should've stayed retired after dropping his belt at WM6. That was the twilight of his ability in the ring...and even then he was losing a step.
AWA was a posterchild for mismanagement as Gagne didn't have a clue about the future of the business. Vern Gagne lost his house because of it. Hogan was over in the AWA yes, but not a fraction of what he was when Vince's marketing blitz combined with the pre-expsosure from Rocky III helped Hulkamania run wild (gag). If it weren't for McMahon's involvement, Hogan would've probably run the gambit as a wrestling journeyman or pulled a Stan Hansen and worked strictly in Japan.
I respect plenty about someone's legacy. Especially when they have the sense not to tarnish it by sticking around too long. I pray I never have to watch HHH or Angle stumble around the ring acting like tough nursing home patients as it is about as corny as watching all of the Legends beat on that jobber (I think it was Conway) on the Raw Homecoming weeks back. I liked Hogan fine when I was a little kid and didn't know anything more than what was fed to me on Prime Time Wrestling. However, when they bring an old fogey back to work full matches with current stars it's disgusting and doesn't help to elevate the credibility of the business. You don't see the NY Jets having Namath start a few plays this season because of nostalgia, do you? It'd be only slightly more retarted than Hogan taking on Orton at Summerslam.
Jermberm said:I agree with some. Austin, Kane, Taker, Rock, DX, and Hogan formed this buissness. He has flaws but if your life was being filmed you might lie about shit or make it bigger than it really was......
well, yea, im sick and tired of hogan. his move sucked: people, its a god damn leg drop. big deal. and ive never watched the show, but of what u just said, that sounds like complete bull$hit
tjhere said:112535Other than that Hogan spent the majority of his matches getting owned by the competition only to just all the sudden hulk up and win the match.
Yes, and Foley doesn't spend his days conjoined to a tanning bed and showing up on PPV to whip out his stuff to the crowd. For all the juice he's cycled, Hogan better be in good shape. My argument revolved around what each does in terms of effort to get their matches/characters over. You enjoy Hogan's schtick? Fine. Knock yourself out. Say your prayers while you're at it. Foley is a very ugly dude, don't get me wrong. I, however, put much more stake in what he does as he sacrificed life and limb numerous times to put his matches over, and even though he was slow and unathletic compared to most guys, his last matches were still better than anything Hogan has put out in over a decade. Hogan's stuff worked when I was five. Even when the NWO came out, he was still seen as being a cornball. He removed the realistic credibitlity the faction could've had.Wow..just...wow. You praise Foley and yet insult Hogan for having wrinkled tits.Quite an intriguing and pathetic argument. Foley hasnt been in-shape for years. Tell him to take off his shirt and lets see how great a bod he has. Hogan is 53 and still has quite a physique for all hes been through. Show me any recent picture that has him out-of-shape? Dying to see.
The controversy from the entire incident had to do with Hall and Nash leaving WWF. Nitro had begun to attract new viewers during that time because of those two, as Hogan was off making Oscar-worthy movies. The swerve worked, yes. We know that. The problem was that they used him as the focal point of the group when he couldn't wrestle. He was a on-air personality who looked more like Nash and Hall's dad as opposed to one of their running mates. The belt was left on him for too long and other, better wrestlers (even Nash) could've ran with the torch and been fully prepared for the upscale workrate of Vince's product. Compare the main-events on average in WWF to WCW in 1997. WCW's were typically a farce because Hogan was almost always involved. This is what allowed guys like Austin to get over and eventually for WWF to claw their way back on top. By the time WCW figured out how bad they f***ed up in doing this, it was far too late. Notice the difference in pops that The Black and White got against the Wolfpac? Hogan was reviled, and it wasn't just because he was a heel. Even when the NWO was fresh he was still booed, whereas his cohorts were worshipped.And, if Hogan had done as you said, then the absolute biggest heel turn in history and the biggest and most famed stable in history would not have launched WCW to the top. For being so crappy, fans still were totally behind him and still are. Yet, when he went Hollywood in 96, it brought WCW to the top. Youre telling me the nWo would have gone as large as it had if the biggest babyface in history hadnt been heading it?
And there were numerous other wrestlers who could've filled Hogan's spot in the long run, but they kept bleeding Hullkamania dry until it was beyond passe' and putting him in feuds with fat guys to bodyslam. McMahon painted himself into a corner instead of planning for the future with credible athletes to take over. Vince's big contingency plan when he finally realized his star lost its luster? Jim Helwig. Astounding.I know the immense complexities of a corporation might befuddle you but if there isnt a bottom or a middle or a top, then the corporation fails. McMahon made the matches. Hogan performed in them. Its a two-part thing. Ya following? Try to keep up. Hogan had more charisma and presence and psychology than any wrestler of his time and his abilities put him over in AWA and allowed him to be the only man suited for the job of carrying an entire company. Vince marketed Hogan but Hogan made the marketing possible. You arent gonna market One Man Gang or the Brooklyn Brawler to mega-stardom no matter how much you try.
And how much did The Rock or Austin even wrestle in Japan compared to Hogan? Where's the precedent? How many tours did Rock do with NJPW? AJPW? It's fine that a lot of other people agree he's awesome. They buy the gimmick, and that's gravy for them. I loved it when I was a little kid, too. The funny thing is that Hogan was deemed corny long before the NWO, so saying he's always "pleased" the fans wherever he went is bunk. The whole reason for WCW failing is his stranglehold onto a title he had zero business wearing. The majority can have Hogan. I'll have logic and an appreciation for relevant talent, not old hacks living on past merits. I'm not saying he's the worst wrestler ever, or something like that. He was great...before 1990. His amazing career as far as I'm concerned concluded at the Toronto Skydome. Anything after that in the ring was a gigantic example of one person living in denial with regards to what they could do inside the ring anymore and not hanging it up when they should.And Hogan was over in both the States and Japan which is not true of The Rock or Austin as neither were very technical and could not adapt. Hogna ALWAYS gave the fans what they wanted. In the United States, fans wanted his power wrestler and thats what he showed. They wanted some technical skill in Japan and he delivered. Pleasing the fans is what wrestling is all about and thats what Hogan has done each and every place hes been. I hope you realize that you and the other IWC people who hate Hogan are outnumbered a billion-to-one and thus your opinion is entirely worthless. Hogan sells wherever he is and your pitiful insults will never even come close to blemishing his amazing career.
I make no assumptions as to Randy's character. He's probably a collossal prick. I speak in terms of his ability and usefulness to the company. That's just the f***ing point! Hogan doesn't need to come back. He's in the Hall of Fame for crissakes. Let him stay there. And tell me what credibility is left in watching an old man stumble around the ring with someone else who works five speeds ahead of him in a lousy match that disrespects the once proud legacy he made? To me, it's none. The decision to pass the torch to Warrior wasn't exactly something Hogan was jumping for joy about as I've read his book and the knocks he had for the Ultimate Looney. McMahon and pretty much everyone else didn't like Helwig, but he saw $$$ so that's how the book went down. Goldberg was pretty much the same thing when Bischoff and friends put all their eggs in one basket through late '97 through '98 with Bill's "streak." The title change was a cheap ratings ploy to try and curb momentum from a show that was kicking their ass. For Lesnar to lose to Hogan would be the dumbest thing in history. Look, we know wrestling is fake. Hogan doesn't and never did have the physical tools to make a believable challenge to Lesnar. The kid's a freak of nature with legit shooter skills and the strength and speed of a goddamn lion. Hogan beating him would be an insult to everything based around any inclination of logic within the industry considering he was the youngest to wear the strap at the time. The Rock is actually doing what Hogan wanted to do...parley his wrestling career into successful movies. McMahon also made the smart move in doing this as The Rock physically outgunned Hogan by a factor of three and was just as good of an entertainer as Hogan ever was, the difference being him finding his niche' after Stone Cold found his own. McMahon also like initially having his hand in The People's Cookie Jar with relation to Dwayne's initial movie profits.Well, dont worry. Randy Ortons pitiful future is safe. Hes really a jackass but if he keeps a head, hell be around for a while. But dont even think that his career is worth as much as Hogans image. If Hogan came back and lost to everyone, what would winning over him be worth? Say Hogan lost to Lesnar, Angle, Michaels, Undertaker, Orton and the two times he lost to The Rock. What credibility is left? It be him making an appearance to please the fans and then losing. The fans come to see Hulk Hogan win... So, you give the fans what they want. Hes not a full-time worker and his image is worth more to the WWE than Ortons or Cenas or any of the current talents entire career because Hogan is the biggest thing in wrestling history. ALSO, Hogan is smart about who he loses to. He has tried to pass the torch a number of times: to Warrior, to Goldberg, to Lesnar and The Rock. What resounding legacies they ahve forged.............
Maybe. But that's fine with me, as I obviously have standards for what entertains me and you don't. Next time Hogan stumbles down the aisle and embarrasses himself and helps to drag any sort of establishable credibility with regards to WWE television, remember me.And, in the end, Hogan will be the greatest legend in the business because of what he did for it. He will be the only megastar in a company that has had many superstars and your criticism will be as worthless as used toilet paper.
My bias? He clears a pretty penny for each appearance, for sure. His ego is what keeps him coming back. His body is destitute with regards to his joints and he'll be walking on crutches in about ten years, but he can't not be in the spotlight. Not a shred of evidence, eh? Try standards. Maybe taste? Maybe respect for a special run that was tarnished by an overreaching ego and a departure of talent? Terry also refers to himself by his stage name whilst at home. If that's not egomaniacal, someone better wake me up because I'm trapped in The Matrix.Hogan has an ego and unlike many, hes entitled to it. He comes back to please the fans and I respect him for that. If you want to say he comes back for the money, thats fine. Its only your bias and it means nothing to me. It cant be proven and thats a very common fact in much of the anti-Hogan sentiment. Not a shred of evidence to support the insults hurled at him. Its quite sickening.
Idiot, have you ever watched RvD wrestle anytime within the past seven or eight years? He does the EXACT same thing. It's called entertainment. What kind of story would it be if good defeats evil EVERY single time. As a matter of fact, watch ANY Wrestlemania, and see if the majority of matches are exactly like that. The "good guy" will get beat down only to prevail and whoop the "bad guy" as soon as the fans start to cheer him; to give him the "energy" needed to win.