Im so sick of people complaining about Batista returning and getting a top spot. Batista was a bigger star during a more popular time than just about anyone on the regular roster today, certainly way bigger than Daniel Bryan. Its not like this hasnt happened before, in fact its commonplace in wrestling.
Let's have a look then.
The Rock left in 2003 and immediately got the main event spot two years ago, then left again only to return and again get the top spot.
The Rock officially returned as the Host of WM 27, and promptly got into a feud with John Cena. Their Main Event match at WM 28 was billed a whole entire year in advance, had no effect on the major Title belts, and never directly crushed any narratives. Their rematch at WM 29 could be seen as a derailer that affected the likes of CM Punk's championship reign, but this was planned in advance, so far in advance that Punk's sudden reversal of fortunes way back in the summer of '11 probably weren't even thought of, much less planned out. If anything, Punk's surge into Main Event Status and how it crashed against the glass ceiling of Rock/Cena is a perfect example of how long NOT to plan a major 'world-changing' program in wrestling.
Hulk Hogan immediately got top billing when he went to WCW in 1994 and got top billing for each of his short lived WWE returns 2002-07.
I noticed you left out WM 9, when Hulk Hogan jumped right into the title picture after wrestling a tag match earlier in the crowd, essentially nudging aside Bret Hart to take the title, when he went to WCW. I think this was after his absence form WWF due to steroid investigations. It's the closest to come to what's going on with Batista. As for what you listed, WCW was the epitome of bad business decisions, the late 2001 return was long enough to NOT seriously crush any storylines, and his '05 run started in a small appearance at Wrestlemania 21 where he saved Eugene. It wasn't until he got into a Tag Team with- and subsequently betrayed by- Shawn Michaels that he wound up in the Main Event picture. Not that anything was crushed there either.
Kevin Nash immediately got top billing when he returned to WCW in 1996 and main evented through out his WWE return (when healthy) 2002-05.
Didn't take long to prove Nash didn't have WCW's interests in heart. Most of his Main Event status in the 2000's seemed more to do with Triple H, or him being fed to Triple H- Raw was a fucking mess back then.
Shawn Michaels immediately got main event status when he returned after a four year abscence in 2002.
He got a built-up storyline with Triple H and was cast as the wronged victim to a sinister heel, and more to the point, wasn't nudging anyone aside to play the part. Probably didn't hurt that he wasn't horrible in the ring in his debut.
Brett Hart got top billing as soon as he debuted in WCW in 1998, Lex Luger jumped to the top of the card when he debuted in WWE in 1993 & did the same when he returned to WCW in 1995, Goldberg immediately got top billing when he debuted in WWE in 2003 after having been out of wrestling for nearly three years.
-NOBODY was getting the fuck over the NWO during their reign, not even the Hitman. See how messed up his time in WCW was BEFORE getting kicked in the head.
-Luger took advantage, as Hogan and Hart and Nash did, of the competitive nature that comes with two separate organizations trying to dominate each other; they were top draws in one area and could name their price in order to jump ship. More to the point, they were still active and full-time WHEN they jumped ship.
-You know.... Goldberg comes the closest to Batista in terms of how long he was gone when he came back. So what're the differences? Goldberg went after the Rock and not the Titles during his debut, he got some time before he persued the titles, and near as I can tell, he didn't nudge anybody aside.
There are numerous other examples, fact is its common place to jump start storylines by infusing new blood of returning super stars previously not on the show. Certainly given the ratings and viewership levels of WWE when Batista was last on top of the card vs what they are now it makes sense with WrestleMania on the horizon WWE would want to try and lure fans back by utilizing as many big stars as possible. Daniel Bryan has certainly not been forgotten or ignored, his fans shouldnt complain.
Here's what your examples had in common;
-Those who moved between organizations in the 90's until WCW's demise weren't so much returning part-timers as they were Prize Free Agents. These are wrestlers who could dictate their prices and in some cases their demands.
-Those who were gone for a long period of time actually did NOT debut in a Title Match or won a title shot on their very first appearance, did not make their debuts during Wrestlemania season, and didn't take over storylines.
-Storylines were, to the best of my knowledge, not bent or taken over by these returning icons. They had their own storylines set up for them or created shortly after their returns.
-In regards to Daniel Bryan, whom most believe was shoved to the side for Batista... can you name a wrestler who was in fact shoved aside by the returns you mentioned? Only example I know of is Bret Hart in WM 9.
I don't think people are complaining so much about Batista having a Top Spot as they are the context behind it. They're complaining about him basically taking over what seems to have been the most important storyline since Summerslam as soon as he arrived, which I'm pretty sure has NEVER been done before, and it's going over as well as anybody with common sense could predict. In short, Creative fucked him over by putting him in this position.