Mustang Sally
Sells seashells by the seashore
Blood runs thin from generation to generation.
Weve all heard this expression; the idea that children who follow in their parents footsteps often pale in comparison in degree of success or level of performance sometimes its a lack of drive or originality that causes juniors failure to rise up to the standard of excellence attained by Dad. Sometimes its lack of physical or mental gifts keeping the offspring down, sometimes its simply that the climate/circumstances in which the son functions has changed from the days that the father enjoyed his prime.
There are tons of father-son combinations in pro wrestling. Ive taken a few of the more prominent ones and tried to examine whom I thought enjoyed greater success. These are my opinions and Id love to read yours. Disagreement is welcome. (Ive picked only guys Ive seen perform in the ring)
(NOTE: Of course, there are many daughters who chose the same professions as their mothers but I cant think of any in pro wrestling. As far as mother-daughter combos in other areas, I think its understood that all women are successful in anything they do, so theres no practical reason for comparison).
Dusty Rhodes/Cody RhodesComparison is difficult because they are so amazingly different. Cody is a functional mid-carder who has been pushed like crazy. Theyve tried to force a personality onto him with numerous programs but hes still pretty bland. Of course, his physique is vastly superior to his fathers. Dusty did it more with his mouth and brawling style in the ring. As head booker for parts of his career, he was able to cast himself as the hero of Bunkhouse Brawls and other gimmick matches that cemented his legend as a tough, cowboy-type, barroom brawler. His body was ridiculous but he moved around the ring better than youd think he could. His promos were superior to Codys; I think he could still talk rings around his son. Even lip-reading, I can pick up his speech defect, but the guy could stir up interest with his mouth, in contrast to Cody.
(Yes, Dustin (Goldust) Runnels is Dustys son, too .but the character of Goldust defies description in comparison to anything Dad ever did. Goldust was an amusing gimmick that featured some damn good ring wrestling, which often got lost in the message. During the early part of his career as Goldust, WWE never identified him as the son of Dusty Rhodes ..and there sure as hell was good reason for that.)
Who is more successful?I say Dusty, by a country mile. He was a hero to lots of people, especially in the South. Cody is a made-for-TV, average wrestler.
Bob Orton Jr/Randy OrtonNo thinning of the legend here. Randy is twice the ring performer his father ever was: his body is harder, his moves more exciting, his ring psychology more pronounced and defined. Dad was a soft-bodied cowboy with no particular ring repertoire. For all that, Bob Jr. was still a better wrestler than his father, Bob Orton Sr., whom I saw a couple of times on a retro show on some local TV station. In this family, the grandson is the best of all of em, proving that the bloodline sometimes gets stronger as generations pass.
Who is more successful?I dont recall Cowboy Bob winning any world titles. He spent more time in WWF as Roddy Pipers flunky than a star in his own right. Randy wins by a lot.
Bruno Sammartino/David SammartinoTalk about trading on your fathers fame. Wikipedia lists David as 252 pounds, yet I remember seeing him fight for WCW in their cruiserweight division. Maybe he weighs 252 now, but he was closer to 190 back then. Adding to that, he was a terrible wrestler; underskilled, unenthusiastic and sloppy. He was a little guy who plainly roided, which made me wonder how his straight-arrow Dad, the purist, felt about that. As for Bruno, even though hes a stubborn ass today, he was the wrestler of the 1960s and an all-time immortal.
Who is more successful?The generation gap was never wider.
Ted DiBiase/Ted DiBiase Jr.This is a more useful comparison. Senior was an excellent technician in the ring and a dominant presence outside it. His physique reminds me of The Miz; not a fat body, yet not a hardbody. He wasnt fast or athletic, but he knew his way around the ring. Junior is an acceptable journeyman, a good example of blood thinning over a generation. He looks good while standing still, yet doesnt do anything exceptionally well in the ring. Theyve tried him as a face and a heel but he hasnt carved out a niche for himself, at least yet.
Who is more successful?Senior by miles. True, he did it largely with his mouth, but he helped other guys get over by stirring up controversy around them. Where would Irwin R. Schyster have been without him? Some might still be predicting success for Junior in the future, but I dont see it.
Rocky Johnson/Duane (The Rock) JohnsonRocky was a well-built midcarder with skills I find hard to remember. Did he win championships or accomplish anything noteworthy? Id have to look it up to find out; which is kind of the point. I recall seeing him pin Butch Reed in a match held in Canada in the 80s; there was nothing special about it, yet certainly nothing wrong with it. In the ring, he might have been more fundamentally sound than his son, but thats because Rock did it more with flash and dash than technical wrestling. You could write volumes about how exciting Son was in action; his legend is secure. Rocks ring repertoire was lightning-fast, yet I always wondered how hed fare in a shoot match.
Who is more successful?I wont insult Rocky Sr. by saying it out loud.
Jerry Lawler/Brian ChristopherI liked the sons physique better ..and thats all. Dad was enormously successful in the South because of his combination of hard work and ability on the mic. I saw him on USWA telecasts, stirring up more trouble with his mouth than anyone around at that time. He didnt yell because he didnt have to. Although never particularly well-built, he seemed like the perfect type to have at your back in a dark alley....a true tough guy. Brian could have amounted to much more if not for his damn substance abuse. At his best, he could move around the ring pretty well, and he executed high-flying maneuvers with much more skill than his father ever could. Still, Jerry built a legendary career on grind-it-out wrestling while Brian ruined his all by himself through chemistry.
Who is more successful?Like the Sammartinos, heres another good example of a son who should have picked a line of work different from his fathers. Or stayed clean.
Davey Boy Smith/Harry SmithHarry was suspended for steroid use? Thats a shame, since the juice apparently didnt work. What would he have looked like without the chemicals? The Pillsbury Doughboy? He was also totally boring in the ring despite the fact we wanted him to make it big. He seemed to be trying but couldnt generate heat, even as a bad guy. His first-cousin Nattie seemed to be tougher. His father was a different story, although steroids made a big difference in his case (a fatal difference, ultimately), but he knew how to wrestle and always seemed to be involved in exciting contests. The British Bulldogs best days came during his pairing with The Dynamite Kid (now, there was a wrestler). To me, they were one of the immortal tag teams, the kind we could use more of today. Compared to his son, Bulldog featured as a true workhorse, really giving all for his profession while Harry had the size, but not the look (or apparent makeup) of a tough-guy wrestler.
Who is more successful?Bulldog by any measure. Both father and son won tag team championships, but Davey Boys were won during an era that tag teams were far more highly regarded than Harrys. Yes, thats not Harrys fault, but you have to wonder if Harrys team would have won them at all in a tougher era for tag teams. Meanwhile, anyone who wants to argue that son stirred up more fame and excitement than father will have to have some pretty compelling arguments.
Weve all heard this expression; the idea that children who follow in their parents footsteps often pale in comparison in degree of success or level of performance sometimes its a lack of drive or originality that causes juniors failure to rise up to the standard of excellence attained by Dad. Sometimes its lack of physical or mental gifts keeping the offspring down, sometimes its simply that the climate/circumstances in which the son functions has changed from the days that the father enjoyed his prime.
There are tons of father-son combinations in pro wrestling. Ive taken a few of the more prominent ones and tried to examine whom I thought enjoyed greater success. These are my opinions and Id love to read yours. Disagreement is welcome. (Ive picked only guys Ive seen perform in the ring)
(NOTE: Of course, there are many daughters who chose the same professions as their mothers but I cant think of any in pro wrestling. As far as mother-daughter combos in other areas, I think its understood that all women are successful in anything they do, so theres no practical reason for comparison).
Dusty Rhodes/Cody RhodesComparison is difficult because they are so amazingly different. Cody is a functional mid-carder who has been pushed like crazy. Theyve tried to force a personality onto him with numerous programs but hes still pretty bland. Of course, his physique is vastly superior to his fathers. Dusty did it more with his mouth and brawling style in the ring. As head booker for parts of his career, he was able to cast himself as the hero of Bunkhouse Brawls and other gimmick matches that cemented his legend as a tough, cowboy-type, barroom brawler. His body was ridiculous but he moved around the ring better than youd think he could. His promos were superior to Codys; I think he could still talk rings around his son. Even lip-reading, I can pick up his speech defect, but the guy could stir up interest with his mouth, in contrast to Cody.
(Yes, Dustin (Goldust) Runnels is Dustys son, too .but the character of Goldust defies description in comparison to anything Dad ever did. Goldust was an amusing gimmick that featured some damn good ring wrestling, which often got lost in the message. During the early part of his career as Goldust, WWE never identified him as the son of Dusty Rhodes ..and there sure as hell was good reason for that.)
Who is more successful?I say Dusty, by a country mile. He was a hero to lots of people, especially in the South. Cody is a made-for-TV, average wrestler.
Bob Orton Jr/Randy OrtonNo thinning of the legend here. Randy is twice the ring performer his father ever was: his body is harder, his moves more exciting, his ring psychology more pronounced and defined. Dad was a soft-bodied cowboy with no particular ring repertoire. For all that, Bob Jr. was still a better wrestler than his father, Bob Orton Sr., whom I saw a couple of times on a retro show on some local TV station. In this family, the grandson is the best of all of em, proving that the bloodline sometimes gets stronger as generations pass.
Who is more successful?I dont recall Cowboy Bob winning any world titles. He spent more time in WWF as Roddy Pipers flunky than a star in his own right. Randy wins by a lot.
Bruno Sammartino/David SammartinoTalk about trading on your fathers fame. Wikipedia lists David as 252 pounds, yet I remember seeing him fight for WCW in their cruiserweight division. Maybe he weighs 252 now, but he was closer to 190 back then. Adding to that, he was a terrible wrestler; underskilled, unenthusiastic and sloppy. He was a little guy who plainly roided, which made me wonder how his straight-arrow Dad, the purist, felt about that. As for Bruno, even though hes a stubborn ass today, he was the wrestler of the 1960s and an all-time immortal.
Who is more successful?The generation gap was never wider.
Ted DiBiase/Ted DiBiase Jr.This is a more useful comparison. Senior was an excellent technician in the ring and a dominant presence outside it. His physique reminds me of The Miz; not a fat body, yet not a hardbody. He wasnt fast or athletic, but he knew his way around the ring. Junior is an acceptable journeyman, a good example of blood thinning over a generation. He looks good while standing still, yet doesnt do anything exceptionally well in the ring. Theyve tried him as a face and a heel but he hasnt carved out a niche for himself, at least yet.
Who is more successful?Senior by miles. True, he did it largely with his mouth, but he helped other guys get over by stirring up controversy around them. Where would Irwin R. Schyster have been without him? Some might still be predicting success for Junior in the future, but I dont see it.
Rocky Johnson/Duane (The Rock) JohnsonRocky was a well-built midcarder with skills I find hard to remember. Did he win championships or accomplish anything noteworthy? Id have to look it up to find out; which is kind of the point. I recall seeing him pin Butch Reed in a match held in Canada in the 80s; there was nothing special about it, yet certainly nothing wrong with it. In the ring, he might have been more fundamentally sound than his son, but thats because Rock did it more with flash and dash than technical wrestling. You could write volumes about how exciting Son was in action; his legend is secure. Rocks ring repertoire was lightning-fast, yet I always wondered how hed fare in a shoot match.
Who is more successful?I wont insult Rocky Sr. by saying it out loud.
Jerry Lawler/Brian ChristopherI liked the sons physique better ..and thats all. Dad was enormously successful in the South because of his combination of hard work and ability on the mic. I saw him on USWA telecasts, stirring up more trouble with his mouth than anyone around at that time. He didnt yell because he didnt have to. Although never particularly well-built, he seemed like the perfect type to have at your back in a dark alley....a true tough guy. Brian could have amounted to much more if not for his damn substance abuse. At his best, he could move around the ring pretty well, and he executed high-flying maneuvers with much more skill than his father ever could. Still, Jerry built a legendary career on grind-it-out wrestling while Brian ruined his all by himself through chemistry.
Who is more successful?Like the Sammartinos, heres another good example of a son who should have picked a line of work different from his fathers. Or stayed clean.
Davey Boy Smith/Harry SmithHarry was suspended for steroid use? Thats a shame, since the juice apparently didnt work. What would he have looked like without the chemicals? The Pillsbury Doughboy? He was also totally boring in the ring despite the fact we wanted him to make it big. He seemed to be trying but couldnt generate heat, even as a bad guy. His first-cousin Nattie seemed to be tougher. His father was a different story, although steroids made a big difference in his case (a fatal difference, ultimately), but he knew how to wrestle and always seemed to be involved in exciting contests. The British Bulldogs best days came during his pairing with The Dynamite Kid (now, there was a wrestler). To me, they were one of the immortal tag teams, the kind we could use more of today. Compared to his son, Bulldog featured as a true workhorse, really giving all for his profession while Harry had the size, but not the look (or apparent makeup) of a tough-guy wrestler.
Who is more successful?Bulldog by any measure. Both father and son won tag team championships, but Davey Boys were won during an era that tag teams were far more highly regarded than Harrys. Yes, thats not Harrys fault, but you have to wonder if Harrys team would have won them at all in a tougher era for tag teams. Meanwhile, anyone who wants to argue that son stirred up more fame and excitement than father will have to have some pretty compelling arguments.