Wait a minute. You call people ******ed for not knowing anything about wrestlers who had their prime 50+ years ago but you don't know anything about wrestlers after 1965? How are you any different from those you criticize? It is pretty damn hard to compare eras but you seem to automatically vote for the older guy regardless of opponent if they're from different eras.
Because
a) When I say I have zero knowledge it's probably an exaggeration. I'd imagine I'm still better informed than the majority of the forum.
b) If I legitimately don't have an understanding of the contest then I either do my homework or I don't vote.
and
c) Irony. I'm docking WZ some of those points I awarded earlier.