Ok, debunk isn’t the right word because I don’t have any actual proof. It’s more like five stories The Brain doesn’t believe. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that in a business built on lies there are some people that don’t always tell the truth. Here are five backstage stories that the majority of the IWC has accepted as fact that don’t quite add up to me.
Hulk Hogan didn’t know the finish of WrestleMania III going into the match
I find this very hard to believe. So much so that I don’t believe it at all. You’re telling me that the main event championship match at the biggest show in the world in front of 93,000 fans was decided on the spot by one of the wrestlers in the match. I don’t think so. I have an easier time believing that Hogan actual did part the Hudson River when traffic was heavy on his way to SummerSlam 89 as he said in his promo that night.
Honky Tonk Man became IC champ because Butch Reed no showed
I guess it’s not totally unbelievable. Steamboat was taking time off because of the birth of his child so the belt needed to come off him. Reed was the one picked to be champion but he no showed the event. At the last minute the decision was made to put the belt on HTM. It’s not so far fetched. One problem with that story.
There you see it. HTM wins the title and is congratulated by a group of wrestlers backstage, including Butch Reed. Maybe he arrived late. I doubt it. TV tapings took several hours and the order of matches was not important. If he was late the match could have waited. Maybe the backstage segment was taped another day. I doubt that too. WWF usually taped a month’s worth of shows in one night so it’s unlikely the celebration was taped a different night than the match. Maybe Butch Reed was the original plan but he was being punished for no showing other events. That sounds reasonable but my point is Butch Reed did not no show the event where Steamboat dropped the title.
Ted Dibiase was supposed to win the WrestleMania IV tournament
The story goes Randy Savage was supposed to beat the Honky Tonk Man for the IC title. HTM refused to drop the title to Savage. Savage was upset by this and was awarded the World title at WM4 to appease him. That’s one hell of a consolation prize don’t you think? Am I the only one having trouble buying this story? First of all why would HTM of all people have so much stroke that he could dictate who he drops the title to and change the entire plan for WrestleMania and the world title? Secondly, you expect me to believe that Vince McMahon was going to let a heel win the main event of WrestleMania and walk out champion in 1988? No chance. Even all these years later only twice (aside from a failed heel turn in the main event) has a heel won the mania main event, and it took until 2000 for it to happen the first time. Hulk was taking some time off in 1988 and Vince needed another good guy to take his place. That’s why he was paired with Savage in the first place. The wheels were already in motion for Savage to be champion after Hogan. In fact I’m sure WM5 was already planned out before WM4 even happened and the whole thing was built around Hogan and Savage. Sorry, but I see now logically reason to support Dibiase walking out of WM4 as champ.
Lex Luger was supposed to win the title at WrestleMania X
I’ve talked about this one a million times so you can either skip ahead or enjoy #one million one. Supposedly Luger was going to win the title at WM10 but he was shooting his mouth off at a bar the night before and let the cat out of the bag. This got back to Vince and as punishment to Luger he put the belt on Bret Hart instead. This makes ZERO sense if you look at everything leading up to WM10 months ahead of time. If Lex Luger was going to win the title at WM10 there was absolutely no reason to have Hart involved with the title at all. The main event would have simply been Luger vs. Yokozuna. It’s not like they needed to fit Hart in to give him something to do. He was feuding with Owen and ended up wrestling him on that same card anyway. If it was supposed to be Luger all along there was no need for co-winners at the Royal Rumble. Luger wins the Rumble and beats Yoko at mania while Bret faces Owen. Simple as that. Obviously the plan was to put the belt on Hart. Not only did they go with the co-winners at the rumble but they put Owen over Bret in the first match of the night to set up a logical and believable number one contender for the new champ going forward. I believe after SummerSlam 93 the plan was to put the belt on Luger at mania but by the time the Rumble came around Luger lost some steam and the plan was changed. It was certainly not changed the night before the show.
Randy Savage and Stephanie McMahon
You probably all know about this one. Randy Savage was fired from the WWF because of an inappropriate relationship with an underage Stephanie McMahon. Vince was so upset that he never invited Savage back to the WWE and for years would barely mention his name. He held a very personal grudge against Savage. The story sounds far fetched but I guess it would explain why Savage never once came back to the WWE when just about everyone else did. You know what confuses me? If Vince was so upset and had such a personal grudge why did we see this?
No big deal, right? A 45 second shout out to one of the company’s best performers. Pretty small thing considering it was pretty much the last time he was mentioned for so long. Still, if Vince had such a strong hatred for Savage why did he even bother with that at all? Guys disappeared from the WWF without explanation all the time. There was no need to explain Savage’s absence. Even if he wanted to let the fans know Savage was gone he could have simply said they could not agree on a contract while calling a match and left it at that. Instead he went out of his way to thank Savage. Strange thing to do for a guy you just fired for boinking your 16 year old daughter.
There you have it. Five stories a lot of people accept as fact that I don’t believe. What do you think? Do you believe any of these stories? All of them? Maybe some exaggerated truth to some? Let’s hear your thoughts.
Hulk Hogan didn’t know the finish of WrestleMania III going into the match
[YOUTUBE]Cv9OOC006RI[/YOUTUBE]
I find this very hard to believe. So much so that I don’t believe it at all. You’re telling me that the main event championship match at the biggest show in the world in front of 93,000 fans was decided on the spot by one of the wrestlers in the match. I don’t think so. I have an easier time believing that Hogan actual did part the Hudson River when traffic was heavy on his way to SummerSlam 89 as he said in his promo that night.
Honky Tonk Man became IC champ because Butch Reed no showed
I guess it’s not totally unbelievable. Steamboat was taking time off because of the birth of his child so the belt needed to come off him. Reed was the one picked to be champion but he no showed the event. At the last minute the decision was made to put the belt on HTM. It’s not so far fetched. One problem with that story.
[YOUTUBE]urCN9oKcmZ4[/YOUTUBE]
There you see it. HTM wins the title and is congratulated by a group of wrestlers backstage, including Butch Reed. Maybe he arrived late. I doubt it. TV tapings took several hours and the order of matches was not important. If he was late the match could have waited. Maybe the backstage segment was taped another day. I doubt that too. WWF usually taped a month’s worth of shows in one night so it’s unlikely the celebration was taped a different night than the match. Maybe Butch Reed was the original plan but he was being punished for no showing other events. That sounds reasonable but my point is Butch Reed did not no show the event where Steamboat dropped the title.
Ted Dibiase was supposed to win the WrestleMania IV tournament
The story goes Randy Savage was supposed to beat the Honky Tonk Man for the IC title. HTM refused to drop the title to Savage. Savage was upset by this and was awarded the World title at WM4 to appease him. That’s one hell of a consolation prize don’t you think? Am I the only one having trouble buying this story? First of all why would HTM of all people have so much stroke that he could dictate who he drops the title to and change the entire plan for WrestleMania and the world title? Secondly, you expect me to believe that Vince McMahon was going to let a heel win the main event of WrestleMania and walk out champion in 1988? No chance. Even all these years later only twice (aside from a failed heel turn in the main event) has a heel won the mania main event, and it took until 2000 for it to happen the first time. Hulk was taking some time off in 1988 and Vince needed another good guy to take his place. That’s why he was paired with Savage in the first place. The wheels were already in motion for Savage to be champion after Hogan. In fact I’m sure WM5 was already planned out before WM4 even happened and the whole thing was built around Hogan and Savage. Sorry, but I see now logically reason to support Dibiase walking out of WM4 as champ.
Lex Luger was supposed to win the title at WrestleMania X
I’ve talked about this one a million times so you can either skip ahead or enjoy #one million one. Supposedly Luger was going to win the title at WM10 but he was shooting his mouth off at a bar the night before and let the cat out of the bag. This got back to Vince and as punishment to Luger he put the belt on Bret Hart instead. This makes ZERO sense if you look at everything leading up to WM10 months ahead of time. If Lex Luger was going to win the title at WM10 there was absolutely no reason to have Hart involved with the title at all. The main event would have simply been Luger vs. Yokozuna. It’s not like they needed to fit Hart in to give him something to do. He was feuding with Owen and ended up wrestling him on that same card anyway. If it was supposed to be Luger all along there was no need for co-winners at the Royal Rumble. Luger wins the Rumble and beats Yoko at mania while Bret faces Owen. Simple as that. Obviously the plan was to put the belt on Hart. Not only did they go with the co-winners at the rumble but they put Owen over Bret in the first match of the night to set up a logical and believable number one contender for the new champ going forward. I believe after SummerSlam 93 the plan was to put the belt on Luger at mania but by the time the Rumble came around Luger lost some steam and the plan was changed. It was certainly not changed the night before the show.
Randy Savage and Stephanie McMahon
You probably all know about this one. Randy Savage was fired from the WWF because of an inappropriate relationship with an underage Stephanie McMahon. Vince was so upset that he never invited Savage back to the WWE and for years would barely mention his name. He held a very personal grudge against Savage. The story sounds far fetched but I guess it would explain why Savage never once came back to the WWE when just about everyone else did. You know what confuses me? If Vince was so upset and had such a personal grudge why did we see this?
[YOUTUBE]YauJQoPzpAY[/YOUTUBE]
No big deal, right? A 45 second shout out to one of the company’s best performers. Pretty small thing considering it was pretty much the last time he was mentioned for so long. Still, if Vince had such a strong hatred for Savage why did he even bother with that at all? Guys disappeared from the WWF without explanation all the time. There was no need to explain Savage’s absence. Even if he wanted to let the fans know Savage was gone he could have simply said they could not agree on a contract while calling a match and left it at that. Instead he went out of his way to thank Savage. Strange thing to do for a guy you just fired for boinking your 16 year old daughter.
There you have it. Five stories a lot of people accept as fact that I don’t believe. What do you think? Do you believe any of these stories? All of them? Maybe some exaggerated truth to some? Let’s hear your thoughts.