It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
One of the biggest complaints from a lot of the IWC, as well as some of the more regulars among casual fans is that title belts are often swapped too often between the same major players and begin to seem meaningless over a very small course of time.
A lot of us lived through the David Arquette era and know just how far this mentality can really go, but something has really changed in TNA of late in that vein, IMO, and that's the value of the titles they own due to the fact that TNA is now forcibly creating more meaning and prestige behind it's belts by building what seem like perennial champions.
Hear me out...
AJ Styles has held the TNA World Heavyweight championship since September 20th, 2009 a reign of 152 days (to date). In that span, he's defended the title at least six times against the likes of Sting, Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels and Kurt Angle and more. I think we'd all agree that the WHC is the most important title in the company, and the fact that it's laid claim to right now by the biggest young star in TNA who just so happened to knock off three or four of the biggest names in the company in title defense of is nothing to scoff at, IMO. If that isn't prestige and value, I don't know what is.
Now the same can't be said in terms of term length for the other titles and their current holders [Rob Terry (Global), Morgan/Hernandez (World Tag), Doug Williams (X Division), Tara (Knockouts) and Hamada/Kong (Womens Tag) ], but the shenanigans surrounding any of the titles (that TNA historically seemed to revolve around regularly) seem to have really dissipated in the last year or so.
Tara may have only held the Knockouts title since January 17th, but she's been a major player for the title now for months, and held it for a large stretch prior to losing it to ODB (who she won it back from) a few months ago.
Morgan/Hernandez ended up pinning The British Invasion to win the TNA World Tag Team Championships, and prior to their win The British Invasion held the titles from October 18th, 2009 through to January 17th, 2010 a 92 day title run.
Rob Terry recently won the Global Championship from Eric Young at a live event in Cardiff, Wales, UK (which has yet to come to fruition in terms of of the story line on television), but prior to his win, Eric Young held the title from October 18th to January 27th a 102 day title run.
And lastly, Doug Williams won the X Division title on January 28th after cashing in his briefcase to defeat Amazing Red, but prior to this Red held the belt from October 5th, 2009 a 116 day title run.
Perhaps we don't agree, and if we don't I'd love to hear why you think otherwise, but I'm curious to know how the rest of you feel about this, and what it means moving forward for the company? Does this kind of booking even matter? Do you really care how long someone holds a title for, and why or why not?
A lot of us lived through the David Arquette era and know just how far this mentality can really go, but something has really changed in TNA of late in that vein, IMO, and that's the value of the titles they own due to the fact that TNA is now forcibly creating more meaning and prestige behind it's belts by building what seem like perennial champions.
Hear me out...
AJ Styles has held the TNA World Heavyweight championship since September 20th, 2009 a reign of 152 days (to date). In that span, he's defended the title at least six times against the likes of Sting, Samoa Joe, Christopher Daniels and Kurt Angle and more. I think we'd all agree that the WHC is the most important title in the company, and the fact that it's laid claim to right now by the biggest young star in TNA who just so happened to knock off three or four of the biggest names in the company in title defense of is nothing to scoff at, IMO. If that isn't prestige and value, I don't know what is.
Now the same can't be said in terms of term length for the other titles and their current holders [Rob Terry (Global), Morgan/Hernandez (World Tag), Doug Williams (X Division), Tara (Knockouts) and Hamada/Kong (Womens Tag) ], but the shenanigans surrounding any of the titles (that TNA historically seemed to revolve around regularly) seem to have really dissipated in the last year or so.
Tara may have only held the Knockouts title since January 17th, but she's been a major player for the title now for months, and held it for a large stretch prior to losing it to ODB (who she won it back from) a few months ago.
Morgan/Hernandez ended up pinning The British Invasion to win the TNA World Tag Team Championships, and prior to their win The British Invasion held the titles from October 18th, 2009 through to January 17th, 2010 a 92 day title run.
Rob Terry recently won the Global Championship from Eric Young at a live event in Cardiff, Wales, UK (which has yet to come to fruition in terms of of the story line on television), but prior to his win, Eric Young held the title from October 18th to January 27th a 102 day title run.
And lastly, Doug Williams won the X Division title on January 28th after cashing in his briefcase to defeat Amazing Red, but prior to this Red held the belt from October 5th, 2009 a 116 day title run.
Perhaps we don't agree, and if we don't I'd love to hear why you think otherwise, but I'm curious to know how the rest of you feel about this, and what it means moving forward for the company? Does this kind of booking even matter? Do you really care how long someone holds a title for, and why or why not?