The World Cup has come and gone and we have a new name on the trophy, which we were guaranteed come the final, as Spain fulfilled their potential in beating the Netherlands, who have now lost in the final on three separate occasions ('74, '78 and '10).
The final failed to live up to the expectations but that was nothing to do with the Spanish. The 'great' footballing nation of the Netherlands, for the first 45 mins at least, played like an outclassed Sunday league side. Now I am all for a well-organised, defensive side that is willing to get stuck in but not to that extent. They were very lucky to reach half time with 11 men on the pitch. I am sure that Van Bommel means "hatchet man" in Dutch. How he failed to be sent off at any stage in the last three games is beyond me. They also relied far to much on Robben to give them any attacking force. Van Persie has had a very poor tournament and, starved of the ball, Sneijder had no impact on the final.
All the credit though should go to Spain for trying to play the same brand of football that had won them Euro 2008 and defeated the Germans in the semi final. Xavi and Iniesta continued to be patient in the face of the ridiculous tackling of the Dutch midfield. As the game went on, I felt sure that their want/need to walk the ball into the net was going to cost them as Iniesta in particular would not shoot when he had good chances too. It was no surprise that the Spanish looked far more threatening when Fabregas came on to add another dimension to their attack by being more direct and willing to shoot from farther out. This gave the Dutch defence something else to think about and by closing down Fabregas, gaps for Iniesta and Xavi began to appear, as evidenced by the winning goal.
I'm not sure if the Spanish reached the heights of 2008 or recent Barcelona displays but for their overall performances in the semis and the final as well as their solid defence throughout, they probably deserved to win the competition. Indeed, losing their first game was probably the best thing to happen to Spain as it removed the "favourites" tag as well as much of the concurrent pressure.
As a whole, the tournament has been a success, especially for South Africa. Aside from some early travel problems from the stadiums, there have been no complaints (vuvuzelas aside). Most if not all the teams that turned up were defensively proficient and for much of the first round it did not make for entertaining spectacles (I did not really mind as I am fond of watching defensive chess games).
However, there were some glimpses of great attacking football such as Maradona's Argentina, Brazil's first 45 mins against Holland, Japan against the Danes and the Danes themselves against Cameroon. Germany and Spain were probably the most consistent teams with the former's ruthlessness in punishing mistakes from England and Argentina one of the highlights of the tournament for me.
As for player of the tournament, I would agree with Diego Forlan receiving the Golden Ball as all his competition for the title came from players in good sides like the Dutch and Spaniards. Forlan, with his hard work and injection of some class into an energetic, hard-working but ultimately average Uruguay side, got his country of only 3.5million into a semi final.
See you all in Brazil