I spent a lot of time on this so please take the time and have the courtesy to at least read it.
And yet, the attack on Christianity is completely fair, considering the thousands of years people suffered in the other direction.
How can you seriously sit there and justify attacking Christianity? No one ever said that Christianity has been without it's faults over time as it pertains to who has suffered at the hands of it, however that is not an adequate justification for what we see today running rampant across the U.S. People seem to forget that settlers came here to escape religious persecution, and that it was Christianity that this country was founded on. If there is any religion that should be free from the attacks you promote it is Christianity. This is not to say that people shouldn't be able to not be Christian, oppose it, or question it. But, there is a fine line between those things and the outright rape of the religion that we are seeing today in society.
What else would you call it?
The Christian religion is no different than all the other religions the world has seen. It is stories and myths which are created to explain why the world works the way it does, and is used as a political and moneymaking tool. This is religion. It doesn't matter what religion, they all fall into the same category.
As someone who claims to be a Christian, surely you know that most of your religious stories, beliefs, and customs do not originate at all with Christianity, correct?
I beg to differ, Christianity is quite a bit different than the other religions the world has seen. First of all, in no other major religion is the key prophet or savior also sacrificed/martyred for the sins of the people, the son of God, or an actual person that existed as Christ can be historically proven to have. Also, Christianity stood out as a monotheistic religion and at it's time of origin, aside from the only other Abrahamic religion at the time of Christ, Judaism.
I doubt you've ever heard of it, and yes I do know my history, but there was a religion practiced in Rome pre-dating Christianity called Mithraism that some believe to have been a "competitor" to Christianity around 2 A.D. It was a form of Grecco-Roman Paganism and the origins of the date for the birth of Christ. Most know it came from paganism but not "where from" within paganism as it was rather broad. It was the celebratory date of the birth of the sun according to this mythological religion. That date "was chosen to be held holy not like the pagans "because of the birth of the sun" but for he who made it", and that is documented from 320 A.D. This is a big difference between a lot of the ancient religions and Christianity as well. Most of them were literally just made up, they just made up Gods and made up practices based in nothing. Christianity is obviously centered around an actual person believed to be the son of God, the savior of man, and based on the teachings of said person who was not just supposed to be the son of God but God himself in essence as well.
While religion has been manipulated in the past as a political and money making tool, that is not the fault of the religion itself of it's teachings. These things come from the folly of man, and mans corruption OF religion. If I remember keenly it's made pretty clear in The Holy Bible that false prophets and those who spread the word of God solely for monetary gain are frowned upon by the Lord and face heavy punishment for corrupting the Lords' word, so where you get this notion that religion itself or Christianity specifically is what you say it is-is kind of baffling.
Mat 24:3-5,10-11 (NIV) ..."Tell us," they said, "when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?" Jesus answered, "Watch out that no one deceives you, for many will come in my name,.. At that time many will turn away from the faith... and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people."
Jer 23:21-22 (NIV) "I did not send these prophets, yet they have run with their message; I did not speak to them, yet they have prophesied. But if they had stood in my council, they would have proclaimed my words to my people and would have turned them from their evil ways and from their evil deeds."
Jer 8:6-9 (NIV) "I have listened attentively, but they do not say what is right. No one repents of his wickedness, saying, 'What have I done?'.. My people do not know the requirements of the Lord. How can you say, 'We are wise...' Since they have rejected the word of the Lord, what kind of wisdom do they have?"
Jer 14:14 (NIV) "The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have not sent them or appointed them or spoken to them. They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries, and the delusion of their own minds."
Eph 4:14-15 (Jer) Then we shall not be children any longer, or tossed one way and another and carried along by every wind of doctrine, at the mercy of all the tricks men play and their cleverness in practicing deceit. If we live by the truth and in love, we shall grow in all ways into Christ, who is the head.
Well...
There's nothing wrong with believing in a religion. The problem I have is when you try to tell us your religion is superior to another religion, or no religion in general. The attacks Christianity faces today is nothing more than blowback from the centuries of attacks Christians have laid on others.
Again you try to justify this attack on Christianity. At least you didn't try to be so bold as to deny that it is a reality of society. It's been getting worse and worse since the turn of the last century with Darwinism, Atheism, and later Secularism. I'd also like to ask what blowback Christianity has earned here in the short existence of the Unites States? Okay, homosexuals have a legit gripe, but they are also in direct contradiction of something laid out very clearly in the Bible as an abomination. With the advancement of science and research into the homosexual lifestyle and trends within the homosexual community there are far more reasons beyond strictly religious beliefs to oppose is as well. The health risks alone, susceptibility to mental illness and pre existing mental illness in many, the heightened risk of rape from other homosexuals, increased risk and susceptibility to drug and alcohol addiction, suicide rates, etc.... all point to an inevitable fact that there is not just something but a lot wrong with it and you can't just try to blame that shit on "the oppression of society". Society doesn't make them BE gay, make them do the things they do, and is not responsible for their actions.
Other than that who can complain about "the oppression of Christianity" in America. Certainly not women. Nowhere in The Bible has it ever said to make sure women can't vote, or work, or that they are not equal to men. As a matter of fact at the very beginning God states that it was not good for man to be alone so he decided to make him a
partner, not a superior or a subservient. Also, if you are following the teachings of Christ any mistreatment of women doesn't line up with that at all anyways. You can say that man has used religion to justify injustices through twisted interpretations, but that is not the fault of the religion itself, once again that is the flaw of man.
It is obvious that within The Bible, man interjected some of his own agenda through history, but today we can clearly see where this took place and look past it. Most of the stuff people criticize in The Bible comes from the early Old Testament, but the whole purpose of Christ being sent here by God was to help man get it right where we had got it so horrible wrong, and to clarify the message of God as is explained and displayed in The Bible as well. The point there being that the Old Testament is not to be taken as the law of man in its entirety as it is an example of how flawed man was in delivering the word of God to the people, and as mentioned, serving his own agenda in doing so.
You...you're joking right? People are KILLED in this country for simply LOOKING Muslim. I would advise you to reconsider your comment here.
I call bullshit. That is a gross exaggeration. When Muslim kids get special privileges in schools to leave class so they can bow to Mecca and pray, yet it is disallowed for Christians to have prayer in school, that is far from the picture you paint. When Christmas is turned into a holiday of consumerism and the observance of it's true meaning is discouraged in every way possible what would you call it? When Christians are treated with such intolerance, made to compromise their beliefs or completely ignore them by secular society, while you can't say a damn thing against Islam or Judaism without either being Anti-Muslim even though the Quran DOES teach that killing people is okay(I read it myself last night) or Anti-Semetic if you simply don't agree with Judaism, and are made to sit down, shut up, and just let the rest of the country trample all over your beliefs, the beliefs and religion this country WAS founded on, and whose values shaped our constitution and bill or rights, YEAH I'd say there is a problem.
No one is trying to force anyone to BE Christians, but America always has been a Christian nation, and Christianity has always been the religion OF the nation. Many of our traditions, our values, our way of life, and as I mentioned before even our Constitution and Bill of Rights are based in it. It's not right for people to come to this country and expect that we change everything about it, and change what this country is, what is was founded on, the values of this nation, or to tolerate the mistreatment of the Christian community because they believe in something else, or don't like Christianity.
Guess what, if one of us were to go to Iran or Saudi Arabia I can guarantee they sure as shit aren't going to change anything about their religion and the role of that religion in their society to accommodate us no matter how much we disliked it or disagreed. So why should we as Americans be forced to do just that for everyone else? No one is saying you can't be Muslim, or Buddhist, or Jewish, or anything else, but we sure as hell aren't going to stop being Christians, championing our beliefs, and upholding them within our society because other people don't like it and want us to change to cater to them. That's just not how it works and it's not right to us.
Or maybe they simply don't believe the stories in your 2000 year old book written by men who were greedy liars intent on keeping women subservient and punishing anyone who didn't believe and behave exactly like them?
In "My" 2000 year old book? Yeah, I love how you put that. I already covered your allegations about the writers of the Bible and the issues on women so you can refer back to that on this one. Although there may have been some truth to what you are saying here at one time, in modern society it has nothing to do with "Punishing anyone who doesn't believe and behave exactly like we do" or keeping women subservient in any way. Anyone doing anything of the sort is twisting it around and acting on their own impulses and biases, not anything they were actually taught from the Bible.
That's not it at all.
What we don't believe is that Christians know what the heck they are talking about. Catholics are required to not eat meat during Lent and eat fish on Fridays. Why? Because a pope in the 13th or 14th century owned a large fishing company and this made him huge profits. Christians don't believe in contraception, which is simply asinine given the number of single parents and STDS which exist. Christians believe that a woman should be submissive to her man, and never his equal. Christians believe homosexuals should be scorned and killed. Christians believe anyone who doesn't believe the way they do deserve to be destroyed in war.
Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies. I am well aware that there are folks out there who do reflect those beliefs you mentioned, but that's not what Christianity itself teaches anyone. Again, that is an example of people taking shit out of context, twisting the word of God, or using it to serve their own agenda in some other way. Catholics, specifically do not believe in contraception for a number of reasons that I am sure I don't need to explain to you as you were raised Catholic. However, did it ever occur to you that part of the reason behind that was to try and promote abstinence until marriage which would obvious have a positive effect on society as whole, or to try and make people be more responsible in marriage not to have too many kids and in turn have to raise those kids in poverty because they have too many? This would also help reduce the number of children and families raised on the government dollar which in turn comes from you and me, and in turn also helps the economy and society as whole. You still object though right? Damn that personal responsibility.
Not all Christians or even a majority believe that women should be submissive to their husbands either, that is a rather out-dated belief that most today see well past. Those that observe it though, do so of their own free will just as they can reject it of their own free will.
And as for homosexuals...Here we go again. Okay, In Leviticus 18:22 it says "A man is not to lie with another man as one lies with a women, it is an abomination, and Leviticus 20:13 says "If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads." and this is where people like you get this ammunition. However you forget that in the New Testament it is Jesus' teaching that "whoever is without sin may cast the first stone" and that was in reference to a sexual act of adultery even. Since we are all sinners Jesus makes it pretty clear to us that we are in fact NOT to do anything like that, and that's just ONE of Christs teachings that tell us not to treat anyone like that, of the many teachings the promote people treating each other with love, compassion, respect, and leaving any punishment we have coming for our actions up to God the father to take out on us if indeed we never repent or as for forgiveness for our sins WHICH we are guaranteed through the sacrifice of Christ who died on the cross so that we could be forgiven.
These are all facts about Christians. FACTS, not beliefs. You can find all of these in your search of Christian history, and a ton more evil things which were wrought by Christianity. When we go to our higher education schools, we learn these facts. We are taught the ability to think for ourselves whether these actions are right or wrong. So many Christians believe in their religion simply because that's what they've been told their entire lives to believe, never once questioning why or the evil things the faith has done. If you are presented with all the facts and you are armed with the ability to think rationally and logically and for yourself, and you still choose Christianity after soul-searching and after everything you know about Christian history, then fair enough. You've made the CHOICE to be a Christian.
But most people never make the choice, they simply do as they're told, like sheep being led to the pasture.
If with all your education, facts, and ability to think for yourself rationally and logically but you can't see that these things that occurred in history were actions of MAN not the religion itself than I would ask for a refund on my education, or take a deep look at myself and ask why this hatred for Christianity is in me, and why I was foolish and naive enough to allow someone to bring me to this misguided understanding. None of your "Facts" are about "Christianity" per-say, they are about the horrible things people have done in the name of Christianity and there is a big difference. No one is questioning whether the actions of Popes past or other members of Christianity were wrong, we know they were, but you can't or at least shouldn't go and condemn the whole religion because of that, or compromise your own faith because secularists in educational institutions have done such a fine job of painting the religion itself as this inhuman evil monster that you seem to be convinced it is.
I find it funny as well that you don't see folks like yourself as being the exact same as those you call sheep being led to pasture. You are being led out to pasture just the same doing exactly as society, and your beloved institutions are telling you, taking this twisted view of the religion, melding together the flaws and acts of man and the religion itself as if the religion is responsible for the actions of the people who did these horrible things in the past and who continue to do horrible things today. Those people are often times extremists, or complete wack jobs, or people who simply never had anything explained to them the right way.
It's not an enlightenment from religion, it's enlightenment from mental slavery.
Religion isn't mental slavery. If you take the time to understand the meaning behind the teachings, many of them rather common sense are obvious if you are paying attention, you see that it is actually very freeing. Answer me this, if you are following the 10 commandments lets say, you are living your life a Jesus has instructed, how are you not free? You have the freedom to make your own choices anyways so this notion of slavery is rather ill-conceived, but either way, how is one a slave if they simply obey? It free's you from all kinds of worries that leading a moral and decent life affords you, keeps you out of all kinds of trouble, and tries to guide you on a righteous path in life to lead you on a road to heaven. What is not freeing about that? It's almost the same as obeying the laws of the city you live in, are you a slave by obeying the laws? No, and if you do you have little to nothing to worry about, you aren't going to get in trouble because you've done nothing wrong which allows you to be free. In religion obedience allows you to be free from vices, sin, and numerous miseries that come from disobeying the word of God and making serious mistakes in life that one often pays for long term.
From the moment I was born, I was indoctrinated into the Catholic religion. I was baptised shortly after I was born. I went to Sunday School classes when I was 4. I had my first reconciliation when I was in second grade, where I was supposed to tell the priest how I was a bad person and hope God would save me (surely you can see how the slavery is being formed). I took my first communion in second grade as well, where I ate the body and drank the blood of Christ, with the understanding this would make me stronger as a person.
You should only be so glad you had a family that cared about you enough to try and see to it that you were taught these morals and values, and that religion was a cornerstone of your life.
And so it continued. Until I was a senior in high school, and my Sunday school teacher brought in a pamphlet which had been produced by the Baptist church in the same town as the Catholic church I went to. Let's be clear, I was hardly the most religious person. I hated going to Church, and I skipped out on Sunday school classes, even during my Confirmation process during my sophomore year in high school, but when our teacher read this pamphlet to us, it was an epiphany. This pamphlet was of a Catholic police officer who had been shot and his buddy was visiting him in the hospital. Long story short, the story basically went that the Catholic officer who was shot was going to hell, unless he converted to the Baptist religion.
With all that involvement and education in Christianity I am surprised that you would even take that seriously. Obviously that was a horrible thing for that Baptist to say. You should have clearly known better than that, and that such a thing was not true, that the person who tried to say the man was going to hell unless he converted to being a baptist was ignorant of the very faith he was preaching.
This really just saddens me, this story of yours and how it effected you. But, notice this pivotal point in your life, and the source of the information that ultimately turned you away. It was a teacher, someone who you were to trust with your mind and you did, and look what they did with it. They brought forth something to turn you away from your religion. Although you might not have been big on it before, and what kid really is, you were still involved in it and it was obviously still a big part of your life. I am very sorry for you, because I know what they feels like and how shattering it can be. This is one of the main causes I see in people turning away from religion, in some way they feel let down, or lied to when they see things like this Baptist doing what he did. I would urge you to get back into it and do some soul searching, try to find your faith again, and rather than depending on someone else to tell you what it's all about, discovering it for yourself, truly. All the negativity that you have been exposed to and that we get put in our faces all the time is not the true face of Christianity or Catholicism or religion in general and I think somewhere deep down you know that, but it is hard to stand by religion in these modern times when so many discourage it and treat religious people so poorly. I can't blame you for not wanting that persecution and turning away.
This is a true story, and the moment I realized religion isn't nearly all it's cracked up to be. Then I had a class in college about mythology, and I discovered many stories which share the same storylines as many famous Bible stories, except these stories came long before the Bible. We also had to write a paper on the pagan origins of Christmas and Easter, and it was from there I realized just how silly it is to belong to a religion. At that moment, I was free from religious slavery.
Naaw man, it's not silly to belong to a religion. I am sure people made you feel that way, I have been made to feel that way before and it is not a good feeling, but don't let that or doubts that get raised in your mind led you astray. Ya know the thing about those stories, it's not about where they came from, it's about what they taught in them. Why else do you think they were put in The Bible? Because they taught a good lesson somewhere. That should not necessarily tell you or have to mean that your faith in any less valid, as a matter of fact it should validate it for you as it shows you the wisdom that your religion saw in other religions and these stories and felt prudent to teach life and religious lessons to it's followers. The teachings of Christ stand alone as well beyond that, and are what we should really always focus on as it pertains to where our Christian faith is based. I weren't freed from any kind of religious slavery, you were tricked into denying your religion. That may have felt very freeing because once someone was able to convince you that it was all hokum and folklore it meant that you were no longer accountable for your sins since it was all just "make-believe" and you no longer felt like you had to harbor a fear of God or consequences, but you were never a slave to religion, and you were never deceived by religion. You may have been deceived by people who taught it to you, but that is once again, MAN not GOD or Religion.
I still choose to believe there is a divine presence, but I don't do it as a Christian, I do it as an individual thinker, a person who can look at logic and facts and understand religion only gets in the way of spirituality. Thus I have little tolerance for Christians who try to force their archaic beliefs onto others, and then act offended when the same is done to them.
Well what do ya know, we have something in common. I know this whole time you've thought I am a self recognized "Christian" in the most stereotypical sense but I am not. I do not identify myself as a Christian in the sense that many do today. I do agree with the teachings of Christ, so in that sense you may call me a Christian, but I also agree with a lot of teachings from Taoism and Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, and then some. I too came to the conclusion myself that "Organized Religion" not necessarily DOES but CAN get in the way of spirituality, and for me that was the case. I was never a Church person and I never felt comfortable there with the people I was surrounded with. Like you I was also raised in the Church most of my life, but I received more of my teaching at home from my mom and dad than anywhere else. My dad was raised a Roman-Catholic and my mom a Protestant of no denomination. I was taught that church is wherever two or more are gathered for the purpose of learning about God, not a building. I was also taught as Jesus said "If I am for you, who can be against you", and that "Righteous men of all religions shall inherit the kingdom of heaven", that LOVE is the true spirit of God, etc.... I was never taught any of the radical stuff you mentioned.
I never trusted the church and found out early that in modern society it amounted to nothing but a social contest of "Holier than thou art" and it was a place where God was the last person doing the judging, it was everyone else who judged you if you didn't have a nice suit to wear every week or really nice clothes in general, who looked down on you for not being as into the whole social aspect of it as they were(even at a very young age at church I was there to learn about God, not to socialize and be popular with people), and I also wasn't willing to let someone else TELL ME what The Bible meant, I wanted to learn myself and I simply wanted a bit of a guide for the way, while some others wanted to try and teach me what they wanted to teach, not what was simply in there, So I definitely have seen the dark side of it and know exactly what you are talking about through this whole thing. Still, for many people church is a great thing and they need it, it helps them get through their lives and through troubled times and for that I can not condemn it either, I just know it's not for me.
No, it sounds like people who understand the flood to which Christians attach the hero Noah is a story which had been told for thousands of years by other pagan religions. It sounds like people who understand Christians basically stole the idea of Christmas in order to assimilate other cultures. It sounds like people who understand all people should be treated equally for who they are, regardless of their skin color, sexual preference or gender.
That's what it sounds like.
But the story of Noah and the Ark teaches something nonetheless does it not? That is the whole point. Where the story originates doesn't make what it teaches any less relevant to life. You say "Stole" from pagan religions, why not say "Adopted to unite people around a central faith"? One view is negative one is not, don't be negative, cast that shit out man. I do agree, all people should be treated equally, that does not mean however that morals, values, principles, or in some cases even laws should be tarnished or changed that contradict the overlying set of morals, values, principles, or laws that stand already for a reason.
Agreed. No doubt about it.
But that doesn't HAVE to be taught in a religious setting. Those things were taught in a religious setting to control people, to continue to make money off of them, to give them a reason to continue making money for those in power.
You can still teach good values and not live as a Christian or in any other religion.
I did cover that a little bit talking about not going to church at some point and learning at home with my parents more than at church when I was going, and then even more at home. I am just curious who or what put it in your head that those things were taught in a religious setting strictly to control people, make money off of them and give them a reason to continue making money for those in power. I will not and can not deny it entirely, but that not what it ever ALL about. And BTW, what is wrong with controlling peoples conduct and actions to some extent? It's not as if that has changed at all, the only difference is that it comes from a law enforcement group we call the Police instead of the church, and it's a damn good thing we have them or else there would be total chaos.
You have to imagine that without some kind of social order brought about by the teachings of religion, it would have been chaos then too. You can't just let people run wild and indulge all their impulses, there has to be some kind of order, some rules, some authority, some checks and balances. And so what they made money, it's not like they were billing by the hour or something like a shrink, they had to get money through donation and still do. How else were they to maintain the house of worship or have anything for themselves to survive unless you were a monk who just lived in a monastery? It's not all gloom and doom, corruption and oppressive control. Sure, some of that did occur, but that's always what stand out because it WAS BAD. You think there were too many historical accounts of how great the sermon was last week? Or how much food and monetary support the church provided to the poor? No, of course you don't hear about that, that would PROMOTE the religion, and that wouldn't put this negative tyrants face on Religion for those who wish to destroy it.
Really? So when homosexuals are actively hunted down and tortured and killed because that's what God says, that's not a problem in society? When cult leaders take 14 year girls as their wives and have babies with them because God says sex should be for procreation, that's not a problem?
Firstly, When was the last time homosexuals were "actively hunted down, tortured and killed" for any reason? Not any time in recent history that's for sure. They do commit a high level of crimes against each other but you indicate that it comes from radical Christians going out gay bashing and try to kill them. I have never in my lifetime seen or heard of anything of the sort. Oh, and Waco is about the last time the second scenario was relevant, and again that's an extremist and a nut-job that in no way reflects the majority of Christians or religious people in general. Neither of those situations are realistic to the problems of modern society.
I would argue there are just as many problems from living the way God tells us to as there are otherwise.
And I would love to hear you try to explain that without harping on Old Testament shit that Jesus already stuck down.
And that's the way it should be. Knowledge should be what you base your decision on what to believe. Anyone who refuses knowledge is condemning themselves to be slaves of a religious institution. I pity those slaves.
I get what you're getting at but I don't buy that. Knowledge about your religion obviously should have some bearing on where you stand as it pertains to that religion, but knowledge itself should be no ones God.