We have all seen reports over recent months concerning Bryan being to small and that Vince loves the bodybuilder guys but booking says the complete opposite. In the last year WWE has made big talents look like idiot, examples
Big Show - Cried repeatedly, mocked about the fact he may die early, he is not satisfying his wife and he has worn a nappy
Ryback - Cryback
Kaitlyn - Crying
Titus O'Neill - Puking up thanksgivings dinner
Tensai - Worn lingerie, became a jobber and Danced like an idiot
Brodus Clay - Danced like an idiot, became a jobber and called himself a main event playa and then 2 weeks after disappeared for a few months
Tamina - AJ's human shield
Khali - Still Dancing and increased role as a jobber
Big E Langston - IC champion but still loses more than he wins
Mark Henry - Good Santa
Kane - Corporate Kane
Conclusion - Despite WWE showing love for Big Men/Women they consistently use them for comedic purposes and make them look like idiots or just weak and their are only 3 that have survived them atm and they are Harper, Rowen and Reigns.
This booking either shows that:
WWE doesn't like the bigger superstars,
They have terrible bookers
Or the show is just to focused for kids and they add to many comedy segments (my pick)
Your thoughts on the treatment/booking of bigger superstars despite this preserved belief that WWE prefers superstars to be bigger
Big Show - Cried repeatedly, mocked about the fact he may die early, he is not satisfying his wife and he has worn a nappy
Ryback - Cryback
Kaitlyn - Crying
Titus O'Neill - Puking up thanksgivings dinner
Tensai - Worn lingerie, became a jobber and Danced like an idiot
Brodus Clay - Danced like an idiot, became a jobber and called himself a main event playa and then 2 weeks after disappeared for a few months
Tamina - AJ's human shield
Khali - Still Dancing and increased role as a jobber
Big E Langston - IC champion but still loses more than he wins
Mark Henry - Good Santa
Kane - Corporate Kane
Conclusion - Despite WWE showing love for Big Men/Women they consistently use them for comedic purposes and make them look like idiots or just weak and their are only 3 that have survived them atm and they are Harper, Rowen and Reigns.
This booking either shows that:
WWE doesn't like the bigger superstars,
They have terrible bookers
Or the show is just to focused for kids and they add to many comedy segments (my pick)
Your thoughts on the treatment/booking of bigger superstars despite this preserved belief that WWE prefers superstars to be bigger