With the recent death of Umaga, the question arises again about where the responsibility lies in the health of superstars. In recent years we have lost Benoit, Guerrero, Test, and now Umaga at very young ages. (I know some of them were not with the company when they died, but there is no doubt that wrestling was part of the reason their careers were cut short.) The NFL is going through a similar situation with concussions, and their is movement to better care for football players who suffer from head injuries.
The WWE does have a wellness policy, but it is quite obvious that it could only go so far. And the wrestling business is very different from the NFL because wrestlers are more independent. They can move between companies and work all over the world.
So here is my question, does the WWE have a moral responsibility to take every precaution with the health of their performers? Or is it the individual superstars duty to look after themselves? (Now of course both have some responsibility, but who should be the one that takes the lead, the company or the individual?)
The WWE does have a wellness policy, but it is quite obvious that it could only go so far. And the wrestling business is very different from the NFL because wrestlers are more independent. They can move between companies and work all over the world.
So here is my question, does the WWE have a moral responsibility to take every precaution with the health of their performers? Or is it the individual superstars duty to look after themselves? (Now of course both have some responsibility, but who should be the one that takes the lead, the company or the individual?)