PlayTheGame
The Cerebral Assassin
Certain WWE eras have had stand-out stars that pretty much define their respective eras, and were the definitive top guys of said eras. Let me give some examples. In the 80's and early 90's, Hogan was the WWE stand-out. He was the clear face of the company. Although there were other top stars, Hogan was always on a different level. He was always at least one step up. In the so-called PG era, Cena will obviously go down as the WWE stand-out. He's currently the top guy of this generation, and I don't think anyone could really argue that anyone's his equal or above. Again, everyone's at least one step below.
But when you think of the Attitude Era, an era enriched with a lot of high-end talent, I'd argue that there really isn't a stand-out. Instead of one top guy, there were many. We had the likes of Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, Undertaker, Triple H, Mick Foley, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, and more all at the top of the mountain. They were all very talented, and any one of them had the potential to be the sole guy, but I'd say that none of them really were. If you really want to nitpick, you could certainly make a case that Austin & Rock were on a separate level above all the rest. I couldn't argue with that. However, when you try to decipher between the two, usually there's a split feeling as to who was the top guy. Some say Austin, some say Rock. Now, people will argue this until they're blue in the face, but I feel differently about the situation. I'd argue that the A.E. didn't have a stand-out, a specific guy that the generation was all about, thus the point of this thread.
What do you think? Do you agree with this? I would say that most eras have stand-outs, but I don't think the A.E. does. There was just too much high-end talent, no one clearly emerged to be better than the rest in my opinion.
But when you think of the Attitude Era, an era enriched with a lot of high-end talent, I'd argue that there really isn't a stand-out. Instead of one top guy, there were many. We had the likes of Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, Undertaker, Triple H, Mick Foley, Chris Jericho, Kurt Angle, and more all at the top of the mountain. They were all very talented, and any one of them had the potential to be the sole guy, but I'd say that none of them really were. If you really want to nitpick, you could certainly make a case that Austin & Rock were on a separate level above all the rest. I couldn't argue with that. However, when you try to decipher between the two, usually there's a split feeling as to who was the top guy. Some say Austin, some say Rock. Now, people will argue this until they're blue in the face, but I feel differently about the situation. I'd argue that the A.E. didn't have a stand-out, a specific guy that the generation was all about, thus the point of this thread.
What do you think? Do you agree with this? I would say that most eras have stand-outs, but I don't think the A.E. does. There was just too much high-end talent, no one clearly emerged to be better than the rest in my opinion.