Last year, the United Football League opened up play in it's inaugural season, with it consisting of 4 teams with 6 games each, and the Championship game concluding on the day after Thanksgiving. So far throughout the leagues 1 1/2 years of existence, it's been primarily dominated by players who were unable to 'cut it' in the NFL or were deemed to old to play in the NFL anymore. Case in point, Brooks Bollinger, a guy who had 10 career starts in 6 years between the Jets, Vikings, and Cowboys, was named the leagues MVP.
However, with the NFL's labor problems being loudly known, and with there being a strong possibility of there not being ANY NFL Season next year, I had a question that I thought should be asked:
Do you think that the UFL has any shot of becoming a REAL threat to the NFL?
I don't mean that people will watch it if nothings on. I mean that the UFL would steal fans and some big name players from the NFL; how the AFL was to the NFL in the 1960's.
{Note: After this, it's quite a lot of rambling by me. So, if you don't want a little more insight on the league, just skip right down to the comments.}
I mean, let's face it, people will watch football, no matter who's playing or even if they have no rooting interest. And if the NFL loses the entire 2011 season, that would be a GREAT opportunity for the UFL to at least steal some fans/players and make some headlines. Currently, it's viewed as nothing more then a developmental territory for NFL players, even though they've said that they're independent from the NFL.
The guys running this league are quite smart and are quickly learning from their mistakes. Last year they had 2 teams in markets that already had NFL teams - New York and San Francisco - and quickly realized that, due to low attendence (likely b/c of the NFL presence), the teams should locate to places where there weren't already football teams - Connecticut and Sacramento. The Hartford team already has achieved 70% of the attendance total that they reached last year playing in New York - and that was off just 1 game. Sacramento also did well in it's first game, filling up over 95% of the stadiums capacity.
The Omaha Nighthawks also did GREAT in their home opener, also filling up well over 95% of their capacity. Yes, it was only one game, but it was still big numbers and promising for the league.
Obviously the UFL wasn't gonna take the world by storm overnight, but, last week, I actually saw some UFL highlights between Omaha and Hartford on ESPN. It may have been due to the fact that Jeff Garcia, even at the age of 40, lead the team to a game winning TD in the last seconds, but I digress. While it was one little highlight, I think it was a big step for the League that is really trying to make a name for themselves.
They have the right approach - start of small, and go to markets that don't have a significant NFL presence nearby. It's not surprising that Omaha drew great numbers in their opener - Nebraska has the Cornhuskers, and that's all for football. Hartford, the same. Sacramento - yet the same. Granted, Florida's opening game drew >10,000 in the Citrus Bowl. Las Vegas, the highest drawing team last year, didn't do great in it's opener either, but there will be some progress down the line.
Not only are some of their teams drawing quite well early, but they're sticking with their theory and will have a team in Virginia starting next season - yet another state without a NFL representative. Other possible places for expansion include San Antonio, Salt Lake City, Portland, Austin, Raleigh, Honolulu, and Los Angeles, who, like others I've mentioned, don't have an NFL representative nearby (aside from Raleigh with the Panthers, but they're in Charlotte; LA is near Oakland and SF as well, but don't have a team directly in the city).
The players aren't what you would call big namers - with a 40 year old Garcia and Daunte Culpepper arguably being their biggest stars - but I think, if they could, somehow, get any current NFL players to jump over to the UFL if the NFL strikes next year, it would be big news. Obviously Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, or any of the other faces of the league aren't gonna jump, but someone who's in the middle tier could and become the face the League.
Now, I'm not saying that the UFL could overtake the NFL in terms of popularity even with a strike next year, but, let's say the leauge has a year long strike and all of the UFL teams attendance's go up, along with their level of play, is there ANY chance that they could become an actual threat to the NFL within the next 5-10 years? Do you think, that if a strike were to happen, any decent named players would jump to the UFL, even if it's only for a season or two? The league looks like it's headed in the right direction. Is there a possibility of a two team league working in America?
However, with the NFL's labor problems being loudly known, and with there being a strong possibility of there not being ANY NFL Season next year, I had a question that I thought should be asked:
Do you think that the UFL has any shot of becoming a REAL threat to the NFL?
I don't mean that people will watch it if nothings on. I mean that the UFL would steal fans and some big name players from the NFL; how the AFL was to the NFL in the 1960's.
{Note: After this, it's quite a lot of rambling by me. So, if you don't want a little more insight on the league, just skip right down to the comments.}
I mean, let's face it, people will watch football, no matter who's playing or even if they have no rooting interest. And if the NFL loses the entire 2011 season, that would be a GREAT opportunity for the UFL to at least steal some fans/players and make some headlines. Currently, it's viewed as nothing more then a developmental territory for NFL players, even though they've said that they're independent from the NFL.
The guys running this league are quite smart and are quickly learning from their mistakes. Last year they had 2 teams in markets that already had NFL teams - New York and San Francisco - and quickly realized that, due to low attendence (likely b/c of the NFL presence), the teams should locate to places where there weren't already football teams - Connecticut and Sacramento. The Hartford team already has achieved 70% of the attendance total that they reached last year playing in New York - and that was off just 1 game. Sacramento also did well in it's first game, filling up over 95% of the stadiums capacity.
The Omaha Nighthawks also did GREAT in their home opener, also filling up well over 95% of their capacity. Yes, it was only one game, but it was still big numbers and promising for the league.
Obviously the UFL wasn't gonna take the world by storm overnight, but, last week, I actually saw some UFL highlights between Omaha and Hartford on ESPN. It may have been due to the fact that Jeff Garcia, even at the age of 40, lead the team to a game winning TD in the last seconds, but I digress. While it was one little highlight, I think it was a big step for the League that is really trying to make a name for themselves.
They have the right approach - start of small, and go to markets that don't have a significant NFL presence nearby. It's not surprising that Omaha drew great numbers in their opener - Nebraska has the Cornhuskers, and that's all for football. Hartford, the same. Sacramento - yet the same. Granted, Florida's opening game drew >10,000 in the Citrus Bowl. Las Vegas, the highest drawing team last year, didn't do great in it's opener either, but there will be some progress down the line.
Not only are some of their teams drawing quite well early, but they're sticking with their theory and will have a team in Virginia starting next season - yet another state without a NFL representative. Other possible places for expansion include San Antonio, Salt Lake City, Portland, Austin, Raleigh, Honolulu, and Los Angeles, who, like others I've mentioned, don't have an NFL representative nearby (aside from Raleigh with the Panthers, but they're in Charlotte; LA is near Oakland and SF as well, but don't have a team directly in the city).
The players aren't what you would call big namers - with a 40 year old Garcia and Daunte Culpepper arguably being their biggest stars - but I think, if they could, somehow, get any current NFL players to jump over to the UFL if the NFL strikes next year, it would be big news. Obviously Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, or any of the other faces of the league aren't gonna jump, but someone who's in the middle tier could and become the face the League.
Now, I'm not saying that the UFL could overtake the NFL in terms of popularity even with a strike next year, but, let's say the leauge has a year long strike and all of the UFL teams attendance's go up, along with their level of play, is there ANY chance that they could become an actual threat to the NFL within the next 5-10 years? Do you think, that if a strike were to happen, any decent named players would jump to the UFL, even if it's only for a season or two? The league looks like it's headed in the right direction. Is there a possibility of a two team league working in America?