For the next thread in the PWI Award series well talk about Comeback of the Year. This award usually goes to a wrestler who missed significant time due to injury or came out of retirement and made a noticeable impact upon his return. It can also go to someone who struggled one year but returned to prominence the next. Heres the list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWI_Comeback_of_the_Year
I would change 2003. Kurt Angle made an unusually quick return from neck surgery that year. It was quite impressive and I was happy to see he wouldnt be out for a full year like most guys who had neck surgery. My problem with giving him the award is he was only out for three months. My own interpretation of the award means a guy needs to miss a more significant amount of time than that to fully qualify for the award. Thats just me. You can interpret it any way you like. It can certainly be argued that Angles quick and impressive recovery makes him deserving. I could buy into that if the candidates were weak that year, but I think the first runner up is a more deserving winner. I hate to say Goldberg deserved something Angle won as I really dont care for Goldberg, but I believe he was the better choice. We hadnt seen Goldberg in at least two years and he made an immediate impact upon his arrival in WWE. He started by taking out the Rock in what I believe was the Rocks last singles match. He went on to feud with Chris Jericho and Triple H and briefly captured the world title. Overall Id say Angle had a better year than Goldberg. I just dont feel Angle was gone long enough to say he had the best comeback year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWI_Comeback_of_the_Year
I would change 2003. Kurt Angle made an unusually quick return from neck surgery that year. It was quite impressive and I was happy to see he wouldnt be out for a full year like most guys who had neck surgery. My problem with giving him the award is he was only out for three months. My own interpretation of the award means a guy needs to miss a more significant amount of time than that to fully qualify for the award. Thats just me. You can interpret it any way you like. It can certainly be argued that Angles quick and impressive recovery makes him deserving. I could buy into that if the candidates were weak that year, but I think the first runner up is a more deserving winner. I hate to say Goldberg deserved something Angle won as I really dont care for Goldberg, but I believe he was the better choice. We hadnt seen Goldberg in at least two years and he made an immediate impact upon his arrival in WWE. He started by taking out the Rock in what I believe was the Rocks last singles match. He went on to feud with Chris Jericho and Triple H and briefly captured the world title. Overall Id say Angle had a better year than Goldberg. I just dont feel Angle was gone long enough to say he had the best comeback year.