Unsold Bacon
Shucky Ducky Quack Quack
Do you have a favorite RVD attire?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Would you like to see Daniel Bryan form his own stable?
No. Probably one of the worst if I really think about it. But don't tell anyone.Is RVD in fact the greatest thing to ever happen to wrestling?
It goes back and forth between Punk, RVD, and whoever I'm high on that week. I never keep these things locked down.Is RVD your favourite ever wrestler? If not, who is?
Roode.Who would you say has had the better World title reign thus far. Bobby Roode or CM Punk???
The one he wore at Survivor Series 2001 and Backlash 2003.Do you have a favorite RVD attire?
I wouldn't.How much would you pay for a replica RVD MITB Case?
It's goofy, but so are most wrestlers when they speak.What is your opinion on Sheamus speaking?
No.Would you like to see Daniel Bryan form his own stable?
Surprised it hasn't happened already. Given the timetable ROHbots work on, probably by the end of business today.How long should I wait
Before the smarks of the world
Turn on Kevin Steen?
I'll agree. I relate to him in that I'm also a bit of a clutz.I find CM Punk's 'sloppiness' endearing. Agree/disagree.
I find the content of Sheamus' promos goofy. To be fair though, all top WWE faces are saddled with the same bullshit. There've been times over the last year that Punk has made me cringe. So un-Punk.Is it Sheamus' accent that you find "goofy"? Miz's attempt to replicate it turning into nineteenth century cockney makes me think that all North Americans view an Irish accent as alien and frightening.
I did. But having only come to the product when they moved to Spike, I was under the impression that they were dramatically sub-par to the WWE because that's what I'd grown accustomed to in the absence of viable alternatives. I subscribed to the typical BS smark opinions about how the X-Division and young guys are superior to everything and that old timers shouldn't be dominating the main event. The only headliner I was really into was Christian because I'd thought he was held back in the WWE and was finally getting his due. Looking back, maturity and perspective have given me far more enjoyment of the product from back then. It's was a great product.Did you watch TNA in 2006 if so thoughts on the product at the time?
The freshness of the current storyline helps for those two. As for the main event scene in general, it helps that some of the biggest forces up there right now are relative newcomers to the title picture (ex: Roode, Storm, Ray, Aries). Peppering those guys in with the usual faces and the fact that TNA has to accommodate so many huge names and egos with so few main event spots keeps things fresh. I think TNA does a far better job of keeping their main event scene fresh than the WWE. I'm not entirely sure where you're coming from on this one.How do you cope with the repetitiveness in TNA's main event and upper-card scenes? (e.g. Styles vs. Daniels for the umpteenth time)
The freshness of the current storyline helps for those two. As for the main event scene in general, it helps that some of the biggest forces up there right now are relative newcomers to the title picture (ex: Roode, Storm, Ray, Aries). Peppering those guys in with the usual faces and the fact that TNA has to accommodate so many huge names and egos with so few main event spots keeps things fresh. I think TNA does a far better job of keeping their main event scene fresh than the WWE. I'm not entirely sure where you're coming from on this one.
As you've seen, I respond to it very well. Although that might be because when TNA revisits stuff from years gone by, it's not as tiresome as Cena vs Show or bland as the never-ending Sheamus-Ziggler bouts. Sorry, I love it. Watch the show. I'm sure you'll come around as well.Fair comment, but take it from the perspective of someone who doesn't watch TNA regularly, in fact, hasn't watched it in years.
For example, if someone asked me if I wanted to watch the upcoming TNA PPV, I'd ask, "so what's on the card?" The response would be "well 2 of the main matches are Joe vs. Angle, and Styles vs. Daniels". To which I'd be like "really? Has that not been done before?"
Yeah, like you said, there are fresh storylines and such, and neither of those aforementioned matches will be the main event or for the world title, but as the outspoken TNA mark that you are, I wanted to know how you respond to seeing the same pairings as 3, 4, 5 years ago.
Undoubtedly.Do you think Daniel Bryan will become WWE Champion in the future?
Why would I want to do that?When are you going to start writing wrestling reviews?
Why would I want to do that?
Why would I want to do that?
As you've seen, I respond to it very well. Although that might be because when TNA revisits stuff from years gone by, it's not as tiresome as Cena vs Show or bland as the never-ending Sheamus-Ziggler bouts. Sorry, I love it. Watch the show. I'm sure you'll come around as well.