Little Jerry Lawler
Sigmund Freud On Ritalin And Roids
In 2003, HHH held the title for nine months defeating the likes of Scott Steiner, Booker T, Kevin Nash, and Goldberg. During his reign, he beat Kane in a Mask vs. Title match and afterwards Kane removed his mask for the first time. Kane was at his most scariest and dominant since he first debuted. If I would change one thing, I would have Kane removed his mask earlier in the year.
There were a shortage of heels on RAW in 2003 especially in the main event. Basically it was only HHH and at the time you wanted him to lose the title. These days he gets bashed because of that long title reign because he "held" people back. When I look back, there wasn't really another big heel besides HHH and that was one of the main reasons he kept the belt for so long. Kane removed his mask in June, yet the only title shot he received was in Armageddon in December 2003.
Let's say one of Evolution's first major accomplishments was the de-masking of Kane. That would still give WWE time for the Kane/Shane feud and then they can move on. Imagine Booker T winning the title at Wrestlemania and then facing a pissed off Kane later on. Kane could have become the second biggest heel alongside HHH but yet they made Shane look like his equal and really lost momentum because of that. RVD or even Kevin Nash could have won the title if there was another heel. Goldberg did win the title at Unforgiven but he feuded mainly with Evolution and Kane came along for a while because he wanted a shot at the title.
So what would you change about the WWE in 2003? Give reasons why.
There were a shortage of heels on RAW in 2003 especially in the main event. Basically it was only HHH and at the time you wanted him to lose the title. These days he gets bashed because of that long title reign because he "held" people back. When I look back, there wasn't really another big heel besides HHH and that was one of the main reasons he kept the belt for so long. Kane removed his mask in June, yet the only title shot he received was in Armageddon in December 2003.
Let's say one of Evolution's first major accomplishments was the de-masking of Kane. That would still give WWE time for the Kane/Shane feud and then they can move on. Imagine Booker T winning the title at Wrestlemania and then facing a pissed off Kane later on. Kane could have become the second biggest heel alongside HHH but yet they made Shane look like his equal and really lost momentum because of that. RVD or even Kevin Nash could have won the title if there was another heel. Goldberg did win the title at Unforgiven but he feuded mainly with Evolution and Kane came along for a while because he wanted a shot at the title.
So what would you change about the WWE in 2003? Give reasons why.