Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Can you become a legend in TNA??? I'll answer that with another question, are there any legends in the Arena football league that you can think of without having to google??? TNA is not a relevant company, you can't become a legend by doing a bunch of pretty flips, that's pretty much an insult to every wrestling legend. All you have to do to be a legend is work in a "high spot fest" company??????? No, there's more to it. Sorry, your answer is no.
i was just thinking this like a guy like aj styles will be in tna for the rest of his career, if he had a great career in tna and became a legend in tna would he be considered a legend in wrestling period even tho he never went to wwe?
Hate to burst the bubble here but AJ Styles and Joe both started in the WWE. Does that deflate the whole debate?
The way TNA is now, no. If it grows and actually becomes a threat, maybe. Right now TNA is a glorified indy fed.
People need to stop comparing NWA/WCW to TNA because TNA is not even in the same universe when it comes to how big NWA/WCW was. The NWA alone put out legend after legend and right now I don't see anyone in TNA that is even close to being that good.
They're in the same boat my man. TNA just like NWA/WCW were always overshadowed by the WWE and was considered the #2 company but yet the #2 company had the talent similar to what TNA is now. So yes, a comparison can be made. If you don't see any young guy in TNA that you don't think will become a legend, then either you don't watch TNA or you just don't have eyes.
Take guys like Terry Funk for example, who had minimal exposure in WWE, but is a legend worldwide for his work in Japan and NWA/ECW/WCW. Sting is another guy who would be considered 'legendary' despite never having been in the 'E.
Let me ask you guys this, would you consider Rob Van Dam to be a wrestling legend?
Or better yet, would you consider Jarrett to be a legend? Or is he just the guy that WWE buried and started his own company to prove he can get people to care about him?
Why not? Why do wrestling fans keep putting WWE on a high pedestal and pretend as if they're the only wrestling company that can define your status in the business? Sting never stepped foot in WWE and he's still regarded as one of the greatest and is definitely a legend and an icon in this sport. AJ Styles will be to TNA what Sting was to WCW and he will remain loyal and his legend will grow from there. Look at Ric Flair. Ric Flair is basically a legend and is considered the greatest mostly because of his time in NWA/WCW not because of WWE/F, where he had a short run.
That's not a fair comparison by any standards...
10 years ago, or in Funk's case, 25 years ago, was a much different monster than it is now. Indy promotions actually had fan followings, cult followings if you will. Wrestling was in its peak when it came to tv ratings, merchandise sales, mainstream coverage, cross over promotion, etc...
I think it's safe to say that the majority of wrestling fans would have no idea who Terry Funk was without his minimal run in the "E" and the historical context they constantly placed his career in... especially Mick Foley.
Without the WWE, he may, and I say MAY have been consdiered just another good wrestler or wrestling personality.
No and no.
RVD developed a cult following based on his aforementioned affiliation with a glorified Indy wrestling organization - ECW. He was anopther in a long line of spot monkey wrestlers who are / were / forever will be popular with wrestling fans.
But is he a legend ?? Maybe in the comic book world for his knowledge and reportedly kick ass Cali comic store, but not wrestling.
As for J-E-double F J-A-double R-E-double T, it's ultimately based on how far TNA can go and how big they can become. But if you're asking the question right now, Jarrett is no where the imaginary legend title.
Wrestling legends are few and far between - Sammartino, Hogan, Austin, Hart, Flair, Andre, Bockwinkel, etc... There is absolutely no way RVD and Jeff Jarrett make that list !!!!
tbh, WCW was considered the #1 company for quite a while back during the MNW. 82 weeks beating WWF in the ratings wasn't it? So that's almost a year and a half with WCW on top.
The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh said:I'd say yes you can become a legend with enough exposure, no matter where you wrestle. If you prove that you're a consistant draw for about 10 years or so, and your peers have the utmost respect for you, then you can easily become a legend in pro-wrestling.
Take guys like Terry Funk for example, who had minimal exposure in WWE, but is a legend worldwide for his work in Japan and NWA/ECW/WCW. Sting is another guy who would be considered 'legendary' despite never having been in the 'E.
These days it seems that if you're a top draw, have wrestled for more than a decade and live past the average life expectancy of a pro-wrestler, then you're a legend.
The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh said:Let me ask you guys this, would you consider Rob Van Dam to be a wrestling legend?
The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh said:Or better yet, would you consider Jarrett to be a legend? Or is he just the guy that WWE buried and started his own company to prove he can get people to care about him?
The Mark of Zur-En-Arrh said:I can't claim to know much about TNA, because i simply do not enjoy the product, therefore i don't watch, but it seems to me, that TNA aren't in the business of making legends, only acquiring them.
Sure, Sting and Flair are legends of wrestling. However, WCW is a company that's head and shoulders above TNA in terms of production value and just overall audience. Look, no matter who thinks which wrestling company is better than the other, what it all boils down to at the end of the day is numbers. WWE has a much larger audience than TNA, both domestically and internationally, hence the WWE has greater exposure, hence the WWE makes much more money.
The talk of anything "legendary" with TNA at this point in time is entirely premature. Legend is a term that gets tossed around casually and easily. TNA is a company that's only 7 years old. While it's still a young company, the time is coming when TNA is going to have to ante up and kick in if it hopes to be considered in the same league as the WWE. The whole "it's a young company" argument can't go on forever. If TNA is still around in 10 years or so, then that's when the talk of legends can legitimately begin.