There is nothing wrong with the buildup So early on in the road to Wrestlemania.
Not now there isn't. Before HBK promised to win the Rumble, it didn't make any sense whatsoever. Building to Mania made sense, the way they were doing it, did not.
WWE has to deliver on this match since they have invested tons of time into it. Most fans likely want to see a rematch (not me). It definitely builds WM as a huge event and also adds credence to Taker's streak being ultra important.
Tbh, they're going to bang on about Mania in every ad break and between every promo and backstage skit anyway, plus they'll show the WM logo once every 30 minutes, and the announcers will talk about it in every match as well. This year, they've started doing their storylines before the Royal Rumble, whereas previously it's always been after. It's little 2 months away, and there's STILL tickets available, whereas last year it was sold out well before December if i remember correctly, so based on that fact, it would suggest that hyping it earlier isn't actually helping at all. Maybe it's because the only 3 WM angles we have at this point are:
1) Bret v Vince, which apparently isn't drawing, but until i see an hourly breakdown of both Raws with Bret so far, i wouldn't believe that.
2) Taker v HBK, which we all saw last year, and the majority of people don't want a rematch because they feel it will take away from the awesomeness that was the original match, plus it seems like a cop out on the part of WWE to think of something new.
3) Edge won the Royal Rumble, so for the third year in a row, Edge will be in a title match at WM.
So 2 angles we've seen before, one of which has been done to death (Edge/Championship angle), and the other we don't think will live up to last years expectations (although we all said the original match wouldn't live up to the hype, and yet it blatantly did), plus an angle that involves 1 retired wrestler and a wrestling promoter, where most of fans are 'certain', that the actual match won't involve them in the ring at all, but Batista and Cena instead. Now i can only go by what's said on this forum, but the majority of us seem to hate Batista regardless, and are split on Cena. Now i know that WZ doesn't even represent a percentage of the IWC, and the IWC doesn't represent the majority of wrestling fans anyway, but based on the cheers and the boos, i'd say that's a fair assessment. An angle between old guys building to a match involving two talents that a lot of people simply do not like.
So i can see why at this stage there are still tickets left.
In the end, WWE will go with the rematch unfortuantely.
Which is why i said they should do everything they could to make the same match seem as different to the original as possible, but most people don't seem to agree for some reason.
Most people seem to think that it shouldn't happen at all, or if they must do it, then there's no need for titles or stipulations to give it variety. Don't do it or have it
exactly the same as last time, which is a mentality i simply don't understand. I'd be happy to see them go at it again, but not straight up one-on-one. Maybe 2/3 falls. It's still a singles match in all honesty, just one guy's gonna get pinned twice.