I'm not going to lie...I'm kind of drunk when reading this so I skimmed it but!
So I will go through this and argue it anyway because I want to.
I just watched Rise and Fall of ECW..RVD was the TV champ for 23 freakin months, why are you people bitching? You can say RVD puts on good matches, but quite frankly I can't stand the man. I don't "like" cena but I don't "hate" him either. He's had a few good matches and seems to be getting better.
People didn't complain about RVD holding the Title because he had to put it up for grabs at every TV taping and at every PPV, I also don't like Cena but don't hate him either, but even I can spot no improvement in choice of moves, where as RVD has more ring vocabulary than Cena, even in a fraction of what RVD does now, you can see what he does is something that if he is getting the right treatment backstage then he will pull out all stops to put on a good match. Thats not a good thing there but, RVD worked a lot of those matches in a way that some of the ones with Jerry Lynn should be rated five Star matches.
That being said, I too have trouble picturing him as anything other then champ/title hunter. Then again I also don't see Taker as a Champ. He "deserves" it no doubt, but he doesn't cut promos or call people out or anything. He seems like he'll be a boring champion. AGAIN do NOT take this as a "I think Taker sucks" comment because it's not, it's simply stating he doesn't really do the "Champ" thing. Then again each champ is different..ah crap I'm rambling so to sum it up.
Taker is a different beast all together from Cena or RVD, he is a good champion, because he brings some prestige to the Belt, watch some of the feud with Randy Orton and you will see Taker calling out Orton, He called out Kurt Angle before No Mercy 2006.
RVD was champ for 23 months straight, let me guess, all you IWC ate it up and *********ed to it because you love RVD, but now that a man you don't like has had the belt for about 20/24 months you're acting like it's never happened before.
Ive said above RVD is different to Cena, but for another view. RVD held onto the second tier belt in ECW for 23 months, while this wasn't really the case, in theory he only held the second title and not the Top Title in ECW. Cena holding the belt is doing nothing to adding to the company, its like it is keeping the WWE from going up. RVD also brought people in to watching ECW making it grow, which in retrospect wasn't completely a good thing but anyway.
If that information from RAFOECW was wrong and RVD wasn't tv champ for 23 months straight...well then my point is non existant isn't it?
Alex~Vab
Your point is non-existant anyway because of the nature of those two title reigns being different. You don't see Cena defend the Title every week on screen, only at PPVs will you see any
attempt by Cena to Wrestle. But that is just my opinion on the differences between the two title reigns.