Hulk Hogan's Brother
Stop asking me what I'm gonna do!!!
I was reading the TNA TV shows aftermath and review thread and most people who reviewed TNA's 9/12 episode rated it as a good show. They were particularly pleased with the main event and some have even called it TNA's best main event in quite some time. I myself watched the match and I would say that it is among the top 5 women's wrestling matches I have ever seen.
So all this got me thinking as to why can't a knockout be a part of the "Immortal". Yes there is the age-old arguement that women's wrestlers do not draw. But a stable like the "Immortals" contains enough big names to be considered a good draw. By including a female performer into the "Immortal" stable, the TNA creative would actually be promoting their women's division on the back of the "Immortal" stable. Also the women of TNA wrestling are great wrestlers and the addition of a good wrestler always strengthens a stable regardless of the gender.
From a storyline viewpoint, it makes a lot of sense too. The Immortals want absolute control of the company, something which involves winning all the titles in the company. So why neglect the Knockouts title? It will be a great way to promote the women's division if the Knockouts title is brought into the main story arc and the main storyline, in TNA's case, happens to be the "Immortal storyline. Also Mickie James is a somewhat well known name outside the sphere of wrestling too. If she plays the part of the main protagonist or the main antagonist in this angle, it could boost up the ratings too.
As I mentioned earlier historically, women's wrestling has never been considered a draw. But TNA have the division to make it count. It is their chance to actually prove history wrong for a change and show that ANY division can be considered a draw if the company is ready to invest time in it.
So what do you think, can a knockout be a part of the "Immortals"?
So all this got me thinking as to why can't a knockout be a part of the "Immortal". Yes there is the age-old arguement that women's wrestlers do not draw. But a stable like the "Immortals" contains enough big names to be considered a good draw. By including a female performer into the "Immortal" stable, the TNA creative would actually be promoting their women's division on the back of the "Immortal" stable. Also the women of TNA wrestling are great wrestlers and the addition of a good wrestler always strengthens a stable regardless of the gender.
From a storyline viewpoint, it makes a lot of sense too. The Immortals want absolute control of the company, something which involves winning all the titles in the company. So why neglect the Knockouts title? It will be a great way to promote the women's division if the Knockouts title is brought into the main story arc and the main storyline, in TNA's case, happens to be the "Immortal storyline. Also Mickie James is a somewhat well known name outside the sphere of wrestling too. If she plays the part of the main protagonist or the main antagonist in this angle, it could boost up the ratings too.
As I mentioned earlier historically, women's wrestling has never been considered a draw. But TNA have the division to make it count. It is their chance to actually prove history wrong for a change and show that ANY division can be considered a draw if the company is ready to invest time in it.
So what do you think, can a knockout be a part of the "Immortals"?