Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bad Ass said:Ric Flair. There is more to wrestling than technical ability. There is selling, working the crowd, pacing. Ric Flair had the crowd eating out of the palms of his hands when he was in his prime. Bret Hart hardly ever did that.
PauLwaLL50 said:Bret Hart... Guy has more wrestling abilities... just wasnt as good on the mic... Hart also put on better matches
Bret Hart vs Bulldog (I.C. Title)
Ironman Match
Bret vs Austin - I quit
All three of them > any Flair match
Have you ever seen Flair vs. Steamboat? Their series of matches were the best ever held.PauLwaLL50 said:Bret Hart... Guy has more wrestling abilities... just wasnt as good on the mic... Hart also put on better matches
Bret Hart vs Bulldog (I.C. Title)
Ironman Match
Bret vs Austin - I quit
All three of them > any Flair match
Not to mention...Bad Ass said:Have you ever seen Flair vs. Steamboat? Their series of matches were the best ever held.
Not that I pay much attention to Dave Meltzer, but he listed two five-star matches for Bret (vs. Owen, SummerSlam '94; vs. Austin, Wrestlemania 13), while Flair has had six in his career, including four in one year:shayx said:Bret Hart vs. Mr. Perfect
Bret Hart vs. British Bulldog
Bret Hart vs. Owen Hart
Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels
Bret Hart vs. Stone Cold
Bret Hart vs. Chris Benoit
All of these matches are better than any Ric Flair match.
Ric Flair is a legend, and one of the greatest wrestlers and champions of all time. Bret Hart is simply better when it comes to all round wrestling ability.
Can you elaborate on that??? Do you mean that wrestling matches “back then” were longer and actually had some semblance of “psychology”? And Bret and Flair pretty much wrestled in the same era, so I wasn’t sure what you meant by “back then.” Both men started out in the 70’s and competed throughout the 90’s until Bret was forced into retirement due to injuries.PauLwaLL50 said:I think the reason why I dislike Flair is because I really didnt like how wrestling was back then much.....
peopleschamp said:Can you elaborate on that??? Do you mean that wrestling matches “back then” were longer and actually had some semblance of “psychology”? And Bret and Flair pretty much wrestled in the same era, so I wasn’t sure what you meant by “back then.” Both men started out in the 70’s and competed throughout the 90’s until Bret was forced into retirement due to injuries.
I didn’t know what match you were watching, but Flair vs. Funk didn’t really have much “rest holds.” It was a “hardcore” match where Flair and Funk pretty much beat the crap out of each other, and it had intense psychology. It was a classic match which was ahead of its time in terms of intensity.PauLwaLL50 said:What I ment was... Back then the matches were pretty slow paced... For example... Bret vs Terry... Was a good match... But alot of resting holds like sleepers etc.
And Brets matches were more fast paced... It had a lot of resting/submission holds... But it was non-stop action.... Brets best matches happened in the 90's... More or less gimmick matches but still... Its a completly different type of wrestling now then it was in the 80's dont ya think?
peopleschamp said:And Bret Hart had been involved in his share of snoozefests as well, as the Ironman Match was mostly composed of rest holds for 60 minutes.
peopleschamp said:I didnt know what match you were watching, but Flair vs. Funk didnt really have much rest holds. It was a hardcore match where Flair and Funk pretty much beat the crap out of each other, and it had intense psychology. It was a classic match where both guys were basically fighting for pride.
And Bret Hart had been involved in his share of snoozefests as well, as the Ironman Match was mostly composed of rest holds for 60 minutes.
Well, it's pointless for me to try to convince you to believe otherwise since that's your opinion, but when I watched the match I wasn't that impressed. It had it's moments, but I personally preferred Flair vs. Steamboat from Clash of Champions in 1989. To each his own.shayx said:???
The Bret/HBK Ironman Match is the best WWE Championship match of all time!!! Better than all of Flair's hour-long matches.
Flair and Funk fought a few times in 1989, but the match I was referring to was the "I Quit" match at Clash of Champions, and it was one of the earliest hardcore matches in history. Ok, it might be tame compared to some of the future hardcore matches, but its psychology was top-notch, as it had the perfect blend of violence and humor. In that match Flair showed he is a versatile perfomer as it was a departure from Flair's other technical matches (considering that he just had a classic series with Steamboat); and Flair showed that he could excel playing the face role as well.PauLwaLL50 said:Hmm... Its on a tape my uncle had... It wasnt a hardcore match tho? Prob diffrent match... Anyways... Yeah the Ironman match was a snoozefest... But in the beginning it was intence and as well at the end... But you cant really expect two men to just keep goin at it... But maybe Flair is better then Bret in his prime... But Bret got robbed of his legacy... He could of been "The best there is, The best there was, And the best there will ever WOULD be"... But like I said his carear was shortened... But honestly I really havnt seen much "Classic Flair" as much as I saw Bret... So what I consider Flair in his prime.. I consider it from 1992... That was the 1st time I actually saw him live...
peopleschamp said:Flair and Funk fought a few times in 1989, but the match I was referring to was the "I Quit" match at Clash of Champions, and it was one of the earliest hardcore matches in history. Ok, it might be tame compared to some of the future hardcore matches, but its psychology was top-notch, as it had the perfect blend of violence and humor. In that match Flair showed he is a versatile perfomer as it was a departure from Flair's other technical matches (considering that he just had a classic series with Steamboat); and Flair showed that he could excel playing the face role as well.
Speaking of having his career taken away from him, you have to respect Flair for the fact that he almost had his taken away from him BEFORE he had ever reached his prime from the airplane crash in '75. For Flair to come back and have the kind of career he's had (and is still having) is simply astounding.PauLwaLL50 said:But as for Bret... IMO he could of been the best wrestler ever... As I said earlier.. He got his carear takin away from him... But you cant say Bret didnt put on great matches... What I'm tryin to say is... in the 80's Flairs matches might have been the best matches ever... But now that there is a variety of gimmick matches... Its really hard to choose...
peopleschamp said:Speaking of having his career taken away from him, you have to respect Flair for the fact that he almost had his taken away from him BEFORE he had ever reached his prime from the airplane crash in '75. For Flair to come back and have the kind of career he's had (and is still having) is simply astounding.
EDIT - I never said Bret didn't put on great matches or that he isn't great. But we're talking about who is the greatest ever, and I just believe Flair has the edge.
Well, they kind of had to since Bret defeated Flair to win his first WWF/E World championship, on October 12, 1992 in Saskatoon, Saskatchewon to be exact. Supposedly Flair had to drop the title and take time off due to an inner ear infection, and Bret at the time was considered to be the best option, coming off two reigns as Intercontinental champion. The only other options available were the British Bulldog and HBK, but Bulldog was IC champion at the time and HBK was scheduled to win the IC Title from Bulldog.PauLwaLL50 said:BTW did Flair and Bret ever face off 1 on 1? I kno they were in a Tag Match... It was Macho Man and Bret vs Flair and HBK... But did they ever go one on one?