Bleacher Report calls HBK Heel Turn at WM 29, leading to HBK/HHH at WM 30

[Johnny Scumm]

Talk about a bad idea. Or is it a good one?

Basically, they're saying Michaels turns heel at mania costing HHH his career, leading to two me that are retired having a match at WM.

Possible? Or awful?

 

[Captain Morgan Freeman]

Two people who were forced to retire for good facing off against each other.
Only in WWE.

 

[Hard Hit Prince]

Not gonna happen... Smarky mark stupid and pointless dream.

 

[KnowMyRole-ShutYourMouth]

OP is a fucking clown for citing the bleacher report for anything.

 

[TLC]

It'd be a stupid fucking idea

 

[George Steele's Barber]

Anything that gets Michaels back in the ring is a good idea but there are probably way better ways to do it. Sure WWE writers could come up with some ideas to explain the betrayal ("I miss our Monday nights together", "Stephanie should be with me", "You said we'd retire together", "I can't believe you were hanging out with the NAO behind my back") but having a year of Michaels having to explain himself or building up a match as a heel against a face HHH sounds kind of lame.

A better idea is for HBK to accidentally and partially cost HHH the match (missed Superkick) or throw in the towel, both guys disappear and then after announcing DX's entry in to the Hall have HHH turn on HBK resulting in a WM 30 match.

In the end though I think this is just a strategically placed "leaked" story meant to put ideas in to the smarks' minds. A rumored HBK turn may be what it takes to get a viewer to finally decide to spend $60 at the end of the day.

 

[#MrScissorsKick]

Even if this was true or not, I wouldn't mind it to be honest. Sometimes the s/mark inside all of us needs to let go and just enjoy the wrestlemania show....

but Bleacher Report is whack as hell.

 

[The Dragon Saga]

Bleacher Report says a lot of things, hence why it sucks.

But if it were to happen I'm certain the pop would be out of this world. Wouldn't be great angle wise but no matter how HBK comes out of retirement It'll get a pop, but if this is straight from Bleacher Report and isn't from a credible source then its not happening because nobody on B/R has a clue what their talking about, ever.

 

[FunKay the Inevitable]

Wait...wasn't this the report they did last year...and the year before? I sense a developing pattern of unlikely manure...

 

[Uncle Sam]

Shawn puts too much weight on his own words to come out of retirement.

 

[Y 2 Jake]

That'll be the HBK who would only turn heel for a few weeks nearly 8 years ago. The same HBK who's so beloved by fans he'd have to kill Triple H's whole family to get people to boo him. Unless he only appears in Canada.

 

[Shocky]

It was reported on Bleacher Report, so it must be true.

 

[Wolf Pac]

That makes no sense whatsoever. Trust Bleacher Report to talk out of their ass.

I'd post that graphic of Triple H's tweet about Bleacher Report being a joke if I could find it.

 

[ABMorales787]

Sting! Sting is coming to WWE! Sting!

 

[Nate DaMac]

It'd be better if Michaels inadvertently cost Hunter the match, causing HHH to turn on him. Triple H can still play a heel, I don't buy Michaels doing it.

 

[The Crock]

It'd be better if Michaels inadvertently cost Hunter the match, causing HHH to turn on him. Triple H can still play a heel, I don't buy Michaels doing it.

Definitely. Triple H is a way better heel.

 

[Alastor]

Bleacher Report is as accurate as this forum, with more useless slideshows.

 

[justinsayne]

LMAO! This is the same Bleacher Report that 2 days ago posted a crappy slideshow that says to expect Triple H to win his rematch, is that the Bleacher Report you're talking about?

 

[Moon Knight]

Ummm. No. Bad idea and makes zero sense. But it is WWE, so maybe.

 

[MCMG]

I doubt it but HBK/HHH at WM30 is fucking big. Who cares about who retired. Its all about the money and buyrates.

 

[The Butcher]

Bleacher Report is as accurate as this forum, with more useless slideshows.

I'd actually give this forum the edge. We'll hash things out until the truth comes forth, or at the very least one of us will be right. The writers at BR just write an attention grabbing headline and then bullshit their way through the article. Plus most of them are shitty writers. This forum might actually have the edge in terms of grammar and spelling, as well.

 

[Danger Burger]

Agree with Nate anyway, no way micheals is heel.

It would be a match I'd love to see though.

Two retired guys is stupid, but I can see micheals return for a once off, to put trips out of his misery.

Maybe he kicks HHH by mistake (Paul or Brock duck) but if it costs him the match we have two retired guys, which is not good. Have trips go nuts with a sledge and kill brock and HBK, heel turn mid match, that could satisfy me. But thats only if we have to do it!

 

[FlexAmerican Dynamite]

How does it lead to match at WM 30 when Michaels costing HHH the match leads to his forever retirement?

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

How does it lead to match at WM 30 when Michaels costing HHH the match leads to his forever retirement?

You don't get WWE do you?

 

[Cena's #1 In My Heart]

Id rather see CM Punk vs Rob Van Dam headline WM30. Give the true wrestlers some cred.

Battle of the strikers.