Batman 3

It just sucks Ledger died because there was so much potential with that character for #3. Plus it was also a way to bring Harley Quinn into the film series. Ledger's Joker with a Harley Quinn to work with would have been mind-blowing.

Anyway, I hope to God it's not Bane. The Bane character fucking SUCKS. The Riddler, I wouldn't mind, but as Loveless said, he would be a little too much like the Joker. However, I think right now, Victor Zsasz is the best option to be the main villian. I just don't want fucking Tim Booth to play him. Nah, recast him with Ben Foster and it'd be incredible.

Also, I would introduce Talia al Ghul as Batman's new love interest. Fuck Selina Kyle/Catwoman.
 
It just sucks Ledger died because there was so much potential with that character for #3. Plus it was also a way to bring Harley Quinn into the film series. Ledger's Joker with a Harley Quinn to work with would have been mind-blowing.

Anyway, I hope to God it's not Bane. The Bane character fucking SUCKS.

Whaaaaaat? Why do you say that man, just because of his role in Batman & Robin? Bane is one of the best villains in all of Batman's lore, he's a super-genius with super-strength, but of course Schumacher had to shit all over that character and just make him a ******ed sloth.

Why the hate for Bane?
 
Bane could work very well if done correctly, I remember an episode of the Batman:TAS in which Bane is hired by Rupert Thorn to take out Batman, meanwhile Bane is also looking to double cross Thorn and take over the mob as soon as he's finished with Batman, plus if I'm not mistaken doesn't Bane blow a hole in the side of Arkham in the Comics, letting all the psychos Batman has put there out, this could also be used to introduce an whole host of secondary villians, like Killer Croc, Deadshot, Firefly, etc.

Another villian who alot of people prolly don't know of that could make for an interesting story is Hush, I also like the Idea of bring in Thalia Al Ghuel, or bring back Two-Face, (they said Harvey Dent was dead, not Two face, and at the funeral they didn't have an open casket, they could easily have had Two Face locked away at Arkham)
 
Whaaaaaat? Why do you say that man, just because of his role in Batman & Robin? Bane is one of the best villains in all of Batman's lore, he's a super-genius with super-strength, but of course Schumacher had to shit all over that character and just make him a ******ed sloth.

Why the hate for Bane?

Yeah, I should have worded my words better. It's not that Bane as a character sucks; it's just I don't think a character like that has any place in a live action Batman film, especially today.

Seriously, what actor could play Bane? Batista? The choices are so limited in that department, that you either settle with someone terrible, or you just use some shitty CGI to place muscles on an actor, which of course no one wants to see.
 
Or he changes the character slightly and gives him like a biotic suit of some sort. Instead of making him crazy big, they put him in a suit and say its, along with pumping the serum into him, mechanical parts makes him super strong or what not. He is a super strong, super genius.
 
Mickey Rourke:

sin-city2.jpg
 
I think it's gonna be riddler with a female villain..you have to have a female villain..we haven't seen one since the batman begins in 2005, well there wasn't one there was there?

Why not catwomen...also just like the batman from the 60's...it had em all in there...why not have 5 different villains...and introduce new ones..
 
I think it's gonna be riddler with a female villain..you have to have a female villain..we haven't seen one since the batman begins in 2005, well there wasn't one there was there?

Scarecrow looked feminine, but that as close to a female villain that Batman Begins had.

Why not catwomen...also just like the batman from the 60's...it had em all in there...why not have 5 different villains...and introduce new ones..

Why not? Because this isn't the 60s. Look back and see how awful that 60s Batman movie is. Then you will answer your question as to why not.
 
Bane is a little over-the-top, physically, to be Nolan's villian. I wouldn't look for anything too supernatural. This is a more realistic take on the Batman universe, so Freeze, Penguin, etc. are probably out of the question. I understand that Ra's al Ghul is a supernatural character, but he really wasn't presented that way in Batman Begins. If they can find a way for Bane, or Penguin, to be no so over-the-top, I could deal with it.

From what I've read over the last couple of years, Joker was supposed to be the main villain in Batman 3. The script hadn't been written, but the idea was in place. I'm glad they aren't re-casting Joker, because I don't believe anyone could live up to what Ledger did.

The Riddler poses a nice challenge to Batman. His war with Batman would be far more pyschological than Joker. Joker was pretty out there, having some well thought out schemes, but he was pretty clear with what he wanted to do. Riddler isn't. Riddler would be more behind-the-scenes, not really exposing himself. If I had to cast it, and if I could get him, I would cast Daniel Day-Lewis. One of the finest actors on the planet, and would provide a nice bit of intensity to the Riddler.

If Harvey Dent doesn't come back (which I highly doubt he will), I don't want a second villain. How about the ENTIRE City of Gotham? Batman is on the run from just about everyone at this point, so I'm not sure you really need a second, big-name villain. I would like to see Scarecrow back again, even for a smaller role like the Dark Knight. Also, maybe another mob boss? Whatever it turns out to be, I have full confidence in Chris Nolan. He's the best thing to happen to comic book adaptations...well, ever.
 
Yeah, I should have worded my words better. It's not that Bane as a character sucks; it's just I don't think a character like that has any place in a live action Batman film, especially today.

Seriously, what actor could play Bane? Batista? The choices are so limited in that department, that you either settle with someone terrible, or you just use some shitty CGI to place muscles on an actor, which of course no one wants to see.

brock-lesnar1.jpg
 
With the ending of the second movie being that the city finds Batman to be in a sense, the villian, a Penguin character COULD work very well in a 3rd installment. He doesn't have to be as messed up looking as DeVito, but imagine a charismatic leader with a dark side who obtains leadership higher than even Dent, as Mayor, and turns the city against Batman, and people don't realize he's the true villain. I'm not sure what actor could pull it off, but that sort of psychology would go right up Chris Nolan's alley. If this character works well, I could even see the 4th installment having Penguin recruit a nutcase like Edward Nigma to be part of his plan, thus creating the riddler in a very dark way, and perhaps inner conflict where the Riddler becomes too obsessed with whatever plan they hatch that he goes straight up psychotic and even the Penguin is freaked out by him.

I love the Batman films, and I LOVE Chris Nolan's darker take on the series. I sincerely hope this next film continues well because I am already anticipating it without anything being known about it.
 
Joseph Gordon-Levitt to join 'Batman 3?'
Thursday, June 10 2010, 8:22pm EDT
By Jennifer Still

Joseph Gordon-Levitt is reportedly in the running to join the cast of Batman 3 after being tipped by director Christopher Nolan for the role of the Riddler.

The actor, who worked with Nolan on the set of Inception, is said to be the first choice for the part.

"Chris really dug Joseph [as an actor]," a source told Hollywood Life.

"There was a joke at first between them that Joseph wanted to read for Batman 3 and things heated up as filming continued."

The insider added: "It's not 100% confirmed that he's getting [the role of The Riddler] but there's certainly talk about it. Joseph is definitely on the shortlist."

http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/news/a224592/joseph-gordon-levitt-to-join-batman-3.html

So if this is true than looks like Joseph Gordan-Levitt could be our new Riddler, personally I think he'd be a great choice for the role, certainly a much better choice than fucking Johnny Depp
 

IMDB.COM
'Batman Beyond' to return in 2010


25 August 2009 6:28 PM, PDT | digitalspy | See recent digitalspy news »
A new miniseries based on the animated television show Batman Beyond will launch in 2010, according to DC Comics head Dan Didio. In an interview with Newsarama, the executive editor revealed that the firm will reignite the Terry McGinnis incarnation of Batman early next year in response to fans' continued interest in the character. "There will be a Terry McGinnis miniseries early next year. We've heard the fans, we've heard everyone's interest. And right now we're planning to put out a Batman Beyond mini-series in 2010," (more) »
- By Mark Langshaw


Thats probably where the poster came from, it's been confirmed that a new mini series will be launched due to the hightened interest of the fans.

This is gonna be awesome, more Batman for all, this, the red hood, and also Nolans Bat 3
 
i would love for all these villain roles to young up and coming actors, or actors that are familiar but we have not seen them too much.

i would also love to see villains that we have not seen yet in the batman movies like croc or even bane get a bigger role so we know his origins a little more, even though down the road you would have to bring in penguin, riddler, catwoman, and poison ivy.but at which point do you bring in robin, and batgirl
 
From what I understand Nolan is planning on the next Batman movie to be the final chapter in series...

And that third Batman film? Jonathan Nolan is “now doing the hard work” of writing the script based on the story by his sibling and Goyer. “My brother is writing a script for me and we’ll wait to see how it turns out.... He’s struggling to put it together into the epic story that you want it to be.”

“Batman Begins” was the origin and back story of the hero, while “The Dark Knight” found the hero reeling as his Manichean, good vs. evil worldview was upended by a new villain, the Joker, who was a wild-card agent of chaos going up against order, be it a police department or the mob. The second film ends, literally, with Batman on the run, a fugitive.

So what happens next?

“Without getting into specifics, the key thing that makes the third film a great possibility for us is that we want to finish our story,” he said. “And in viewing it as the finishing of a story rather than infinitely blowing up the balloon and expanding the story.”

Nolan said the key surviving characters from the two first films and the actors who play them will be back. “We have a great ensemble, that’s one of the attractions of doing another film, since we’ve been having a great time for years.”

Christopher Nolan Perhaps. But the great challenge is to find a villain (or villains) who can not only match up with the Caped Crusader but also with Heath Ledger’s Academy Award-winning portrayal of the scabby, demented Joker. Fans have churned up the rumor mill for months now (Johnny Depp as the Riddler? Angelina Jolie as Catwoman? Philip Seymour Hoffman as the Penguin? Ben Kingsley as Hugo Strange?). But Nolan, no fan of letting cats out of the bag, declined to play along.

His villain choices to date have steered clear of strongly supernatural or super-science characters (no Man-Bat, Mr. Freeze or Poison Ivy, for instance) but he shook his head when asked if that was a trajectory he would continue. He did however concede one tidbit: “It won’t be," he said, "Mr. Freeze.”

Batman has been throwing punches in the pages of DC Comics since 1939 and as the decades passed, much of the core of the character stayed the same even as Bruce Wayne’s sideburns or the profile of the Batmobile changed. Not so with film.

“I’m very excited about the end of the film, the conclusion, and what we’ve done with the characters,” Nolan said.“My brother has come up with some pretty exciting stuff. Unlike the comics, these things don’t go on forever in film and viewing it as a story with an end is useful. Viewing it as an ending, that sets you very much on the right track about the appropriate conclusion and the essence of what tale we’re telling. And it harkens back to that priority of trying to find the reality in these fantastic stories. That’s what we do.”

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/her...ith-superman-we-have-a-fantastic-story-1.html

With this being the conclusion to Nolans Bat franchise it makes me even more curious as to what's gonna happen, it sounds like we're getting the Riddler for our villain, and that Batman will likely spend much of the movie on the run as a fugitive, it also states that key surviving characters will be back, which has me curious as to what that means for Two-Face, at the end of TDK we saw a funeral for Harvey Dent, and I assume was a closed casket, therefore they could easily have locked Two-Face away at Arkham and not told only one that he is actually Harvey Dent, it has also been reported that Arron Ekhart has said that he would love to come back for another Batman movie if asked
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,848
Messages
3,300,881
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top