Why would WWE try to learn from TNA when this is one of TNA's weakest characteristics? The only thing that makes TNA "different" in their backstage segments is the camera work and back and forth banter attempts to take on a "realistic" feel. Too bad it fails miserably.
The only thing "real" about it is the fact that 98% of the segments wind up in backstage brawls. Granted, a real confrontation between two athletes would probably come to blows 98% of the time but just because it's realistic doesn't make it good television. I find myself constantly watching this vicious circle every week on IW and, quite frankly, it bores the shit out of me and makes me roll my eyes. How many times can you show two guys in a ring, cutting a promo, verbally sucking each other off, and afterwards they wind up brawling backstage? There is NOTHING unique about it anymore and it doesn't tell a story for me. More importantly, it makes me change the channel.
Now why would the WWE want to take pointers from this? When their backstage segments are complete, regardless of whether a brawl breaks out or not, you understand exactly what the goal was, what the segment was about, and where it may or may not end up. Isn't that the point of television? To tell a story to the audience?
I'm sorry TNA but 2 backstage brawls per episode EVERY SINGLE WEEK only tells me that the writers suck at dialogue and take the easy way out by allowing every feuding wrestler to brawl with their counterpart in order to get out of writing a script.
The only thing "real" about it is the fact that 98% of the segments wind up in backstage brawls. Granted, a real confrontation between two athletes would probably come to blows 98% of the time but just because it's realistic doesn't make it good television. I find myself constantly watching this vicious circle every week on IW and, quite frankly, it bores the shit out of me and makes me roll my eyes. How many times can you show two guys in a ring, cutting a promo, verbally sucking each other off, and afterwards they wind up brawling backstage? There is NOTHING unique about it anymore and it doesn't tell a story for me. More importantly, it makes me change the channel.
Now why would the WWE want to take pointers from this? When their backstage segments are complete, regardless of whether a brawl breaks out or not, you understand exactly what the goal was, what the segment was about, and where it may or may not end up. Isn't that the point of television? To tell a story to the audience?
I'm sorry TNA but 2 backstage brawls per episode EVERY SINGLE WEEK only tells me that the writers suck at dialogue and take the easy way out by allowing every feuding wrestler to brawl with their counterpart in order to get out of writing a script.