Average yearly ratings for WWE and TNA, the trend may surprise you! | WrestleZone Forums

Average yearly ratings for WWE and TNA, the trend may surprise you!

kor420

Pre-Show Stalwart
Made the graphs in less then 15 mins in excel. It dates back to 2005 and to 2012, i could of went further back with the wwe, but it would look worse then it does now.

The doted line is the trend line.

tna.png

wwej.png


Yes, i know i misspelled "Wrestling", i just didn't want to go back and change it after i already had the image uploaded.
 
The scales on your Y-Axis should the same. In fact, you should be able to get both lines on one chart. It would also be easier to follow if you labelled your X-Axis with the actual years.

But we all get the point, CM Punk is clearly horrible for Raw's ratings.
 
The scales on your Y-Axis should the same. In fact, you should be able to get both lines on one chart. It would also be easier to follow if you labelled your X-Axis with the actual years.

But we all get the point, CM Punk is clearly horrible for Raw's ratings.

Maybe he think of a better gimmick and catchphrase in his next life.
 
I think most people realised this trend, but the important thing to take right now is that both WWE and TNA took a big loss this year.
 
I think TNA's rating dip this year can be attributed to the new time slot. This past week was the first time that the first hour drew a 1.00 since they went to the new time slot.
 
I got bored of ratings a while ago. About the only thing they tell us is that less people proportionately watch the show live. Meaningful, yes, but it is far from the whole story.
 
The scales on your Y-Axis should the same. In fact, you should be able to get both lines on one chart. It would also be easier to follow if you labelled your X-Axis with the actual years.

But we all get the point, CM Punk is clearly horrible for Raw's ratings.




rawiimpact.png



Mod, can you delete the other images in the OP and add this one for me?
 
If only the title was on Cena.

If i went further, say back prior to 1999, the amount of viewers and wwe lost was alarming. I can almost guarantee RAW would be pulling smackdown numbers if it wasn't for John Cena.

2005-2006 is when john cena fame shot through the roof with the kids and ven as popular as john cena is, he only slowed down decline and hasn't stabilized the ratings.

If i would of made a chart form 2005 - 2012 the results would of be the same as it would for the yearly average for both shows if anyone was wondering that.
 

Thanks Lee, I thought the same thing. Actually, I probably need to update that again soon.
If i went further, say back prior to 1999, the amount of viewers and wwe lost was alarming.
Not really.

While you may see a downward trend, your little line graph exists only in a vacuum. Which is to say it's not taking into account any other factors which have also figured into the downward trend of ratings.

2005-2006 is when john cena fame shot through the roof with the kids and ven as popular as john cena is, he only slowed down decline and hasn't stabilized the ratings.
Not really.

If you go back and look at the average ratings from 2001, you'll see a decline until 2004. Then in 2005, you actually see ratings tick upward until halfway through 2007. Once Chris Benoit committed his double murder-suicide, and the WWE was rocked by the Sports Illustrated steroid scandal a couple of months later, that's when you notice ratings decline again.
 
So TNA took a more significant loss this year than Raw did?

Interesting!

Yeah actually it's kind of shocking, as of late I find myself more interested in TNA as opposed to the E. They have way better storylines and loads of talent going for them. Plus they use their talent right and theirs womens division is strong.
 
Thanks Lee, I thought the same thing. Actually, I probably need to update that again soon.
Not really.

While you may see a downward trend, your little line graph exists only in a vacuum. Which is to say it's not taking into account any other factors which have also figured into the downward trend of ratings.

Not really.

If you go back and look at the average ratings from 2001, you'll see a decline until 2004. Then in 2005, you actually see ratings tick upward until halfway through 2007. Once Chris Benoit committed his double murder-suicide, and the WWE was rocked by the Sports Illustrated steroid scandal a couple of months later, that's when you notice ratings decline again.


Why would i list every little factor for the decline/increase in the ratings in this graph, as it's not important as people can make their own assumptions why the in/decrease in the ratings for that year.

2005 was the year cena was drafted to Raw, the "John Cena Era" was in it's peak at that time, cena injured himself and was out fourteen months in 2007 (2008?).

From 2001 -2004, the yearly average declined from 4.64 - 3.67. Raw yearly average increased to 3.81 2005, to 3.9 in 2006. 2005 is when cena was drafted to raw, and IMHO for the increase in the yearly average for those years, was because of cena.

"Then in 2005, you actually see ratings tick upward until halfway through 2007."

We're not talking about individual ratings for each single raw. These are the average ratings for the year(s) and from 2005 rating fail 3.9 - 3.27, the only spike in the ratings was in 2009, and that yearly average was 3.57.

I Can list every single rating for every single raw from 2001-2012 and the results would still be the same accept the graph would have more up and downs, but the results would still be the same.. RAW has been trending downward.

To get an idea of the direction RAW is heading, you need to look no further from 1999 - 2012 yearly average rating.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top