I'm referring to the match itself, not the promo following. The promo felt impromptu, almost as if to say, "Yes, we really are turning him heel."
As for the match? Who cares if he's a heel or a face? If your opponent has a weakness, you attack it until you're successful and victorious. In this case, it was Del Rio targeting the head of Dolph Ziggler, who just returned to action from a concussion two nights earlier. I suppose if he was truly a swell guy, he'ld ignore attacking the head, although his Enzeguri and Superkick involve aiming for the head anyways. Yes, I understand, it just wasn't that, he spent the entire match that he was on offense targeting the head, but he's trying to regain the World Heavyweight Championship that he just lost. and not The best way to go about it? It wasn't cheating, it wasn't holding the trunks, nor outside interference. It was zeroing in on a weak spot, exploiting it, and winning the match. And because it worked, and that was the entire of Del Rio's offense, it's heelish?
I can see this much more being rationale for Dolph Ziggler turning face. He showed great heart and resolve in continuing to fight, and not allowing the referee to stop the match. Moreover, it creates an actual feud between the two that wasn't there before. So yes, the argument could be made that Ziggler has turned, but Alberto Del Rio? He knew his opponent's weakness, zeroed in on at, and attacked. That's being a smart competitor, not a heel. He's chasing the World Title, after all, not having an exhibition match. It was for the second biggest prize in the company, and by focusing on where Ziggler was weak, he won the title back. What is heelish about that?
I don't want to focus on Ziggler here, as he's irrelevant to this discussion. This is about Alberto Del Rio only.
Am I off here? Was the action in the ring(not the promo after) truly a heel turn?
As for the match? Who cares if he's a heel or a face? If your opponent has a weakness, you attack it until you're successful and victorious. In this case, it was Del Rio targeting the head of Dolph Ziggler, who just returned to action from a concussion two nights earlier. I suppose if he was truly a swell guy, he'ld ignore attacking the head, although his Enzeguri and Superkick involve aiming for the head anyways. Yes, I understand, it just wasn't that, he spent the entire match that he was on offense targeting the head, but he's trying to regain the World Heavyweight Championship that he just lost. and not The best way to go about it? It wasn't cheating, it wasn't holding the trunks, nor outside interference. It was zeroing in on a weak spot, exploiting it, and winning the match. And because it worked, and that was the entire of Del Rio's offense, it's heelish?
I can see this much more being rationale for Dolph Ziggler turning face. He showed great heart and resolve in continuing to fight, and not allowing the referee to stop the match. Moreover, it creates an actual feud between the two that wasn't there before. So yes, the argument could be made that Ziggler has turned, but Alberto Del Rio? He knew his opponent's weakness, zeroed in on at, and attacked. That's being a smart competitor, not a heel. He's chasing the World Title, after all, not having an exhibition match. It was for the second biggest prize in the company, and by focusing on where Ziggler was weak, he won the title back. What is heelish about that?
I don't want to focus on Ziggler here, as he's irrelevant to this discussion. This is about Alberto Del Rio only.
Am I off here? Was the action in the ring(not the promo after) truly a heel turn?