Well, it's that time of year again. Pitchers and catchers are reporting in to spring training and position players will be hot on their heels. The offseason is probably almost over, and any moves made at this point are likely not to be game changers. I doubt Roy Oswalt will make or break anyone's chance at winning the World Series, for example. Before spring training really gets off in earnest, I thought perhaps those of us interested might get predictions in for how they see the 2012 MLB season shaking out - who wins each division, and maybe even forecasting who wins wild cards, who advances in the playoffs, and who brings home the big one. Have at it, friends.
Divisions
AL East - A stacked division with three legitimate contenders, depending on who you ask. I imagine the Rays, Yankees, and Red Sox will be in this one to the bitter end. The Yankees seem like odds on favorites - they have a stacked offense and, if Pineda pans out, could have the best rotation in the division (although Tamba Bay would still have a thing or two to say about that). I don't like the Red Sox a ton, myself - I think they'll still struggle with whatever the heck got into them in September, and besides that, their rotation has serious holes that need to be plugged. The mood seems to positive for the Sox right now, but I'm not sure I buy it. The Rays are somewhere in the middle, that is, the Yankees ended strong and had a strong offseason, the Red Sox ended poor and had a poor offseason, and the Rays ended fair and had a fair offseason. They improved their offense, but look mostly to rely on an already strong rotation. Unfortunately, I think Jeremy Hellickson is going to have a huge downswing this year - I know everyone's high on the kid, and his 2011 basic stats look good, but his real stats are abysmal and they're going to catch up to him. In short, he got lucky last year. I guess what I'm saying is that the Sox and Rays have their issues while the Yankees are a well oiled machine, and I see them headed to the division title here. New York Yankees
AL Central - Alright, now listen up. I know you want me to pick the Tigers. Everyone says pick the Tigers. Well...okay, I will, but not without severe qualification first. The Tigers aren't half as hot as you think they are. Everyone wants to gloss over Victor Martinez in the wake of the Prince Fielder signing, but my bet is that between adjusting to AL pitching and hi customary slump after a great year, Prince Fielder will essentially be a tit for tat replacement for Victor Martinez. All well and good, you say, since the Tigers dominated the division last year. Not so fast. It's almost certain Verlander will regress toward his average, as is customary with Cy Young winners. I suspect that will cost them 2-3 wins (keep in mind they won 95 in 2011). Miguel Cabrera is a bit of a wild card but he may be in for some regression due to the positional change (every time he plays at third it's going to cost his team, and even if he plays at DH it'll be an adjustment). Still, I won't count that heavily. Valverde probably overperformed, and a variety of other factors lead me to expect the Tigers to regress to something like a 90 win or just under team. Now, the flip side, the Cleveland Indians, who were an 80 win team in 2011, but have tremendous potential. Ubaldo Jimenez is almost certainly going to bounce back, probably not to 2010 levels, but a guy that could probably add 4 wins to this team. A healthy season from Shin Soo Choo, who showed no signs of the injuries affect his performane when healthy, makes up even more of that gap. Sizemore is less likely to great even if healthy, as the injuries have been shown to take a toll on his performance when "healthy", but I'm hopeful he'll do better than he did in 2011. What I'm adding these numbers up to is a Central division in which both the Indians and the Tigers are pursuing 90 wins, don't make it, and fight tooth and nail to the end. I'll pick the Tigers overall, because I'm probably just being delusional with regard to Cleveland. Detroit Tigers
AL West - It's very difficult to choose between the established force in the Texas Rangers and the new kids on the block in the Los Angeles Angels. The Rangers' offense remains essentially unchanged from 2011, which is a good thing, since they were among the best. The pitching, however, will look quite different. The addition of Joe Nathan as closer moves Neftali Feliz to the rotation, as the Rangers look to strike lightning again with converting a reliever to a starter (an endeavor I think they'll be successful in, by the by). More interesting, of course, is the major unknown Yu Darvish who can make or break this rotation. I think Yu will not be an ace right away, but will have a respectable season. He won't replicate CJ Wilson, however, and that will cost the Rangers a little bit. Unfortunately for them, they haven't got much ground to give. The Angels took Wilson and reap his benefits, which will be somewhere between his 2010 and 2011 seasons...in other words, very good. He's a legitimate four win guy. And then, of course, enter Pujols. I'm not sure just how good he'll be - he wasn't quite up to his usual stuff in 2011, and he has to adjust to the AL. He could add, on the conservative end, 3 to 6 on the generous end wins to this team. That, if you're keeping track at home, means that the Angels are dancing right in there with the Rangers for this division. It all comes down to how good Yu Darvish is, how well does Albert Pujols perform, does anyone on either team drop off or exceed in quality...so many little things will decide this division, it's almost impossible to predict. I will choose Texas, because the current CAIRO projections like them (by one game, so, kind of meaningless, but still) and because I think the fact that they're an established two time AL Championship team compared to the Angels being a new unit that'll need to figure itself out will swing things ever so slightly in their favor. Texas Rangers
AL Wild Card(s) - Three teams come to mind, of course - the Los Angeles Angels, the Boston Red Sox, and the Tampa Bay Rays. I have too difficult of a time picking against the Angels to win the wild card. The Red Sox and the Rays play in a tougher division, which will hurt their win total, while the Angels will rack up wins against Mariners and Athletics. If there's a second wild card this year, I like the Rays. I'll be honest with you, I don't really have a lot of faith in the Boston Red Sox in 2012, if you haven't guessed yet. They have no shortstop and a rotation that's more holey than a piece of Swiss cheese. I just don't buy into them in 2012. I think it will be as close a margin as it was this year, but I think the Rays will finish ahead of them in the AL East and if there's a second wild card, it belongs to Tampa Bay. (Wild Card 1: Los Angeles Angels ; Wild Card 2: Tampa Bay Rays)
NL East - I see this division being very, very scrappy. The Phillies are the obvious top dogs, as they've run this division now for five years running and look to do it again. Sure, they overpayed for Papelbon, but I'd be willing to bet he's a better closer in 2012 than Madson is, which is only going to make this team better. The rotation will probably not quite as lights out as it was in 2011, but the offense is still mostly intact and added depth in the offseason. I think they'll regress from 2011 in wins, but mostly because their division got so much better. The Marlins bought like they've never bought before and made impact trades. Reyes, Buehrle, Bell, and Zambrano should improve the team a ton, not to mention returning, hopefully healthy Josh Johnson and Hanley Ramirez. This suddenly turns the Marlins rotation into something to be feared, and the offense of Reyes and Ramirez will be feared around the league. And yet, we remember two things: one, the rest of the division is still stacked, and two, the Marlins were in dead last last year. They have a ton of ground to make up, and even a fantastic offseason like this, in a division this strong, can't guarantee them much beyond scrapping. The other team that, more subtly had a brilliant offseason, was the Washington Nationals, who added to their brilliant starters Stephen Strasburg and Jordan Zimmerman Gio Gonzalez and Edwin Jackson, giving them a rotation that, if I may be so bold to say it, rivals the Phillies. Unfortunately for the Nationals, the lukewarm offense of 2011 returns pretty much unchanged from last year, and they couldn't get done the Prince Fielder deal that might have locked down the division for them. The Braves will still be good, but honestly, I don't think they'll be that good, considering they are pretty much the same team as last year and the division just got a ton better. Oh, and, um, Mets fans...sorry about that. I give this division to Philadelphia, but not before the Nationals and the Marlins have had their say. Philadelphia Phillies
NL Central - A very exciting division here. 2011 champs Milwaukee lost Fielder and Braun, the latter for only 50 games fortunately, but that'll sting bad. They also lost depth in the bullpen and adding Ramirez and Gonzalez continues their problem of being too right handed. I see them regressing quite a way, probably to third place, and that only because the Cubs, Astros, and Pirates all suck. The Cardinals also took losses, but fortunately for them, their talent was distributed a little better, but losing arguably the best player in baseball in Albert Pujols is no good for anyone. Still, Carlos Beltran and an ideally healthy Rafael Furcal should keep their offense alive, and even more so if David Freese continues to improve. Adam Wainwright returning also helps, but I don't think he'll be the pitcher he once was, though he'll still be good. The losses of Tony LaRussa and Dave Duncan will also take a huge toll. Add it all together and you have a Cardinals team that simply isn't as good as it was in 2011. The unfortunate news for them is that the Reds had a brilliant offseason, adding Mat Latos, Sean Marshall, and Ryan Madson to severely improve their rotation and bullpen, both of which struggled in 2011. If their offense avoids the injuries that plagued it in 2011, the Reds are my favorites to win here. I think they'll scrap with the Cards till the end, but ultimately they'll win this division. Cincinnati Reds
NL West - I think this will be one of the most fun divisions to watch in 2012. Let's start with the reigning champs. The Diamondbacks had a great 2011, going from worst to first, largely on the back of their pitching and the amazing managerial talents of Kirk Gibson. They improved over the offseason, stacking their bullpen and adding a good starter in Trevor Cahill. Their offense looks to be mostly the same as last year with notable improvement in Jason Kubel. There's no reason, based on last year and the offseason, to believe the Diamondbacks will be anything less than they were in 2011. The trouble for them is that other teams in the division will probably improve. The Giants had a quiet offseason with nothing major to report, but a full season from Buster Posey could change the entire outlook of the team for them. Their 2011 was bad only because of injuries to key players. Give them health, and they can easily win this division again. Interesting as well are both the Rockies and the Dodgers. The Rockies have had a pretty successful offseason, and combined with the big Ubaldo Jimenez trade in the summer of 2011, they now have incredible pitching depth, and they improved their offense with veterans Michael Cuddyer and Marco Scutaro in the offseason. I have no idea what they'll do, to be honest with you. I could see them in second place, and I could see them in fourth. The Dodgers will stay alive and probably around 80 wins thanks to the efforts of Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw, but the team isn't going anywhere until they sell and spend from money on free agents. And the Padres...well, enjoy Carlos Quentin, I guess. I choose the Giants this year, because I think they'll bounce back strong and the Diamondbacks might regress just a tad. San Francisco Giants
NL Wild Card(s) - The wild card are quite hard to pick here. Reasonable teams include Washington, Atlanta, Miami, St. Louis, Milwaukee, and Arizona. Who do you pick out of that mess? Well, personally, I pick the Washington Nationals. I love this team, I think they're really going to have a great 2012. The offense isn't going to turn heads but should be a solid anchor, and their rotation is just plain lights out. If a second wild card is allowed this year...geeze, I'm practically picking a name out of a hat here. I think it could be St. Louis, Atlanta, Miami, or Milwaukee. My gut is screaming St. Louis at me, so let's go with that. (Wild Card 1: Washington Nationals ; Wild Card 2 St. Louis Cardinals)
Postseason:
The post season is very difficult to predict, so I'll mostly be going off gut feelings and conjecture. It's damn near all you can do at this point.
Hypothetical Wild Card Playoff
Supposing this happens, we have a one game playoff between the Los Angeles Angels and the Tampa Bay Rays, and a one game playoff between the Washington Nationals and the St. Louis Cardinals. Choosing the winner of a single game between two playoff teams is like flipping a coin, and that's exactly what I'll be doing. This extremely scientific logic leads to the Rays over the Angels, and the Cardinals over the Nationals. Unfortunately, this now leads to a bit more work for me, since there are now two ways the NLDS and ALDS can unfold.
ALDS
In this case, the Angels have made it to the ALDS. I think the Rangers will have the best record in the AL, and so we have the matchups of the Rangers vs the Angels and the Yankees vs the Tigers. It's a difficult call to make here. The Tigers went over the Yankees last year, but the Yankees got better and the Tigers really didn't. I'll take the Yankees, please. The Rangers and the Angels is a tough nut to crack - just as the division is nearly a toss up to me, so is this series. Hey, look, there's that coin again. The coin says Angels, so there you have it folks. If the second wild card makes it this year, then the Rays take the place of the Angels against the Rangers, in a series that I think would be just as close. I'll take the Rays this time, partly because the coin said so, but also because I think the Rays are a better team than the Angels and arguably better than Texas.
NLDS
One wild card and an assumption of the Phillies having the best record in the NL gives us the Phillies versus the Nationals and the Giants versus the Red. The first series I give to the Phillies, because they're basically the Nationals but with the rotation in its prime, while the Nationals rotation needs a little more time to get there. The Giants and the Reds is a little tougher of a call but I'll give it to the Giants. I think it's a case of the offense being that much better than the Reds offense and the pitching being just a little bit better. Swapping St. Louis for the Reds in case of a second wild card, I still like the Giants. I think they'll outpitch the Cardinals and while the Cardinals will bring an offensive threat, I still think the Giants outdo them.
ALCS
I still have two projected ALCS - the Yankees vs the Rays and the Yankees vs the Angels. For the former, their pitching lines up as dang near even to me, but the Yankees offense is much better than the Rays. I reluctantly give that series to the Yankees. For the latter, I like the Yankees offense a little bit more, the Angels rotation a lot more, and the Yankees bullpen a little bit more. It'd be tight, but I think I'd give it to the Angles. So, fantastic, now I have two World Series projections.
NLCS
Simpler this time, it's the Giants vs the Phillies. I like the Phillies all around better as a team than the Giants. Slightly better offense, much better pitching. Not a ton of conversation to be had about this one, methinks. I have the Phillies here.
World Series
Well, there's two of them. One is Yankees vs Phillies, the other is Phillies vs Angels. I certainly hope it's the latter, so I can root for somebody to win this thing. In the case of the former, we have the age old question come up - batting vs pitching. Who wins that? The track record seems to indicate t hat when it's a battle between the two, pitching wins. The Cardinals had very slightly better pitching than the Rangers, the Giants were the better pitchers, the Yankees were better on both scales, the Phillies were better pitchers than the Rays, and the Red Sox were better than the Rockies on both scales. So, over the last five years, when it came down to the battle, the pitching won. Admittedly, a small sample size and not necessarily the best argument anyway, but I would give it to the Phillies here. In the case of the latter,the Phillies still have better pitching, though to a lesser degree than they would over the Yankees, but conversely, the Phillies gain offensive ground over the Angels compared to the Yankees. The differences are less apparent now but I still like the Phillies with a small edge.
So, there you have it ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to put the prediction in now - your 2012 World Series champion will be the Philadelphia Phillies. Now excuse me while I sacrifice a goat to the elder gods, so that they might prove me wrong and let a more engaging and interesting team win. Of course, this is all way far out and before we even get to spring training in earnest, but this is the landscape as I see it now.
I hope everyone will make their own predictions and debate mine. My methodology is far from absolute and even I'm not thrilled with my pick to win it all.
Divisions
AL East - A stacked division with three legitimate contenders, depending on who you ask. I imagine the Rays, Yankees, and Red Sox will be in this one to the bitter end. The Yankees seem like odds on favorites - they have a stacked offense and, if Pineda pans out, could have the best rotation in the division (although Tamba Bay would still have a thing or two to say about that). I don't like the Red Sox a ton, myself - I think they'll still struggle with whatever the heck got into them in September, and besides that, their rotation has serious holes that need to be plugged. The mood seems to positive for the Sox right now, but I'm not sure I buy it. The Rays are somewhere in the middle, that is, the Yankees ended strong and had a strong offseason, the Red Sox ended poor and had a poor offseason, and the Rays ended fair and had a fair offseason. They improved their offense, but look mostly to rely on an already strong rotation. Unfortunately, I think Jeremy Hellickson is going to have a huge downswing this year - I know everyone's high on the kid, and his 2011 basic stats look good, but his real stats are abysmal and they're going to catch up to him. In short, he got lucky last year. I guess what I'm saying is that the Sox and Rays have their issues while the Yankees are a well oiled machine, and I see them headed to the division title here. New York Yankees
AL Central - Alright, now listen up. I know you want me to pick the Tigers. Everyone says pick the Tigers. Well...okay, I will, but not without severe qualification first. The Tigers aren't half as hot as you think they are. Everyone wants to gloss over Victor Martinez in the wake of the Prince Fielder signing, but my bet is that between adjusting to AL pitching and hi customary slump after a great year, Prince Fielder will essentially be a tit for tat replacement for Victor Martinez. All well and good, you say, since the Tigers dominated the division last year. Not so fast. It's almost certain Verlander will regress toward his average, as is customary with Cy Young winners. I suspect that will cost them 2-3 wins (keep in mind they won 95 in 2011). Miguel Cabrera is a bit of a wild card but he may be in for some regression due to the positional change (every time he plays at third it's going to cost his team, and even if he plays at DH it'll be an adjustment). Still, I won't count that heavily. Valverde probably overperformed, and a variety of other factors lead me to expect the Tigers to regress to something like a 90 win or just under team. Now, the flip side, the Cleveland Indians, who were an 80 win team in 2011, but have tremendous potential. Ubaldo Jimenez is almost certainly going to bounce back, probably not to 2010 levels, but a guy that could probably add 4 wins to this team. A healthy season from Shin Soo Choo, who showed no signs of the injuries affect his performane when healthy, makes up even more of that gap. Sizemore is less likely to great even if healthy, as the injuries have been shown to take a toll on his performance when "healthy", but I'm hopeful he'll do better than he did in 2011. What I'm adding these numbers up to is a Central division in which both the Indians and the Tigers are pursuing 90 wins, don't make it, and fight tooth and nail to the end. I'll pick the Tigers overall, because I'm probably just being delusional with regard to Cleveland. Detroit Tigers
AL West - It's very difficult to choose between the established force in the Texas Rangers and the new kids on the block in the Los Angeles Angels. The Rangers' offense remains essentially unchanged from 2011, which is a good thing, since they were among the best. The pitching, however, will look quite different. The addition of Joe Nathan as closer moves Neftali Feliz to the rotation, as the Rangers look to strike lightning again with converting a reliever to a starter (an endeavor I think they'll be successful in, by the by). More interesting, of course, is the major unknown Yu Darvish who can make or break this rotation. I think Yu will not be an ace right away, but will have a respectable season. He won't replicate CJ Wilson, however, and that will cost the Rangers a little bit. Unfortunately for them, they haven't got much ground to give. The Angels took Wilson and reap his benefits, which will be somewhere between his 2010 and 2011 seasons...in other words, very good. He's a legitimate four win guy. And then, of course, enter Pujols. I'm not sure just how good he'll be - he wasn't quite up to his usual stuff in 2011, and he has to adjust to the AL. He could add, on the conservative end, 3 to 6 on the generous end wins to this team. That, if you're keeping track at home, means that the Angels are dancing right in there with the Rangers for this division. It all comes down to how good Yu Darvish is, how well does Albert Pujols perform, does anyone on either team drop off or exceed in quality...so many little things will decide this division, it's almost impossible to predict. I will choose Texas, because the current CAIRO projections like them (by one game, so, kind of meaningless, but still) and because I think the fact that they're an established two time AL Championship team compared to the Angels being a new unit that'll need to figure itself out will swing things ever so slightly in their favor. Texas Rangers
AL Wild Card(s) - Three teams come to mind, of course - the Los Angeles Angels, the Boston Red Sox, and the Tampa Bay Rays. I have too difficult of a time picking against the Angels to win the wild card. The Red Sox and the Rays play in a tougher division, which will hurt their win total, while the Angels will rack up wins against Mariners and Athletics. If there's a second wild card this year, I like the Rays. I'll be honest with you, I don't really have a lot of faith in the Boston Red Sox in 2012, if you haven't guessed yet. They have no shortstop and a rotation that's more holey than a piece of Swiss cheese. I just don't buy into them in 2012. I think it will be as close a margin as it was this year, but I think the Rays will finish ahead of them in the AL East and if there's a second wild card, it belongs to Tampa Bay. (Wild Card 1: Los Angeles Angels ; Wild Card 2: Tampa Bay Rays)
NL East - I see this division being very, very scrappy. The Phillies are the obvious top dogs, as they've run this division now for five years running and look to do it again. Sure, they overpayed for Papelbon, but I'd be willing to bet he's a better closer in 2012 than Madson is, which is only going to make this team better. The rotation will probably not quite as lights out as it was in 2011, but the offense is still mostly intact and added depth in the offseason. I think they'll regress from 2011 in wins, but mostly because their division got so much better. The Marlins bought like they've never bought before and made impact trades. Reyes, Buehrle, Bell, and Zambrano should improve the team a ton, not to mention returning, hopefully healthy Josh Johnson and Hanley Ramirez. This suddenly turns the Marlins rotation into something to be feared, and the offense of Reyes and Ramirez will be feared around the league. And yet, we remember two things: one, the rest of the division is still stacked, and two, the Marlins were in dead last last year. They have a ton of ground to make up, and even a fantastic offseason like this, in a division this strong, can't guarantee them much beyond scrapping. The other team that, more subtly had a brilliant offseason, was the Washington Nationals, who added to their brilliant starters Stephen Strasburg and Jordan Zimmerman Gio Gonzalez and Edwin Jackson, giving them a rotation that, if I may be so bold to say it, rivals the Phillies. Unfortunately for the Nationals, the lukewarm offense of 2011 returns pretty much unchanged from last year, and they couldn't get done the Prince Fielder deal that might have locked down the division for them. The Braves will still be good, but honestly, I don't think they'll be that good, considering they are pretty much the same team as last year and the division just got a ton better. Oh, and, um, Mets fans...sorry about that. I give this division to Philadelphia, but not before the Nationals and the Marlins have had their say. Philadelphia Phillies
NL Central - A very exciting division here. 2011 champs Milwaukee lost Fielder and Braun, the latter for only 50 games fortunately, but that'll sting bad. They also lost depth in the bullpen and adding Ramirez and Gonzalez continues their problem of being too right handed. I see them regressing quite a way, probably to third place, and that only because the Cubs, Astros, and Pirates all suck. The Cardinals also took losses, but fortunately for them, their talent was distributed a little better, but losing arguably the best player in baseball in Albert Pujols is no good for anyone. Still, Carlos Beltran and an ideally healthy Rafael Furcal should keep their offense alive, and even more so if David Freese continues to improve. Adam Wainwright returning also helps, but I don't think he'll be the pitcher he once was, though he'll still be good. The losses of Tony LaRussa and Dave Duncan will also take a huge toll. Add it all together and you have a Cardinals team that simply isn't as good as it was in 2011. The unfortunate news for them is that the Reds had a brilliant offseason, adding Mat Latos, Sean Marshall, and Ryan Madson to severely improve their rotation and bullpen, both of which struggled in 2011. If their offense avoids the injuries that plagued it in 2011, the Reds are my favorites to win here. I think they'll scrap with the Cards till the end, but ultimately they'll win this division. Cincinnati Reds
NL West - I think this will be one of the most fun divisions to watch in 2012. Let's start with the reigning champs. The Diamondbacks had a great 2011, going from worst to first, largely on the back of their pitching and the amazing managerial talents of Kirk Gibson. They improved over the offseason, stacking their bullpen and adding a good starter in Trevor Cahill. Their offense looks to be mostly the same as last year with notable improvement in Jason Kubel. There's no reason, based on last year and the offseason, to believe the Diamondbacks will be anything less than they were in 2011. The trouble for them is that other teams in the division will probably improve. The Giants had a quiet offseason with nothing major to report, but a full season from Buster Posey could change the entire outlook of the team for them. Their 2011 was bad only because of injuries to key players. Give them health, and they can easily win this division again. Interesting as well are both the Rockies and the Dodgers. The Rockies have had a pretty successful offseason, and combined with the big Ubaldo Jimenez trade in the summer of 2011, they now have incredible pitching depth, and they improved their offense with veterans Michael Cuddyer and Marco Scutaro in the offseason. I have no idea what they'll do, to be honest with you. I could see them in second place, and I could see them in fourth. The Dodgers will stay alive and probably around 80 wins thanks to the efforts of Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw, but the team isn't going anywhere until they sell and spend from money on free agents. And the Padres...well, enjoy Carlos Quentin, I guess. I choose the Giants this year, because I think they'll bounce back strong and the Diamondbacks might regress just a tad. San Francisco Giants
NL Wild Card(s) - The wild card are quite hard to pick here. Reasonable teams include Washington, Atlanta, Miami, St. Louis, Milwaukee, and Arizona. Who do you pick out of that mess? Well, personally, I pick the Washington Nationals. I love this team, I think they're really going to have a great 2012. The offense isn't going to turn heads but should be a solid anchor, and their rotation is just plain lights out. If a second wild card is allowed this year...geeze, I'm practically picking a name out of a hat here. I think it could be St. Louis, Atlanta, Miami, or Milwaukee. My gut is screaming St. Louis at me, so let's go with that. (Wild Card 1: Washington Nationals ; Wild Card 2 St. Louis Cardinals)
Postseason:
The post season is very difficult to predict, so I'll mostly be going off gut feelings and conjecture. It's damn near all you can do at this point.
Hypothetical Wild Card Playoff
Supposing this happens, we have a one game playoff between the Los Angeles Angels and the Tampa Bay Rays, and a one game playoff between the Washington Nationals and the St. Louis Cardinals. Choosing the winner of a single game between two playoff teams is like flipping a coin, and that's exactly what I'll be doing. This extremely scientific logic leads to the Rays over the Angels, and the Cardinals over the Nationals. Unfortunately, this now leads to a bit more work for me, since there are now two ways the NLDS and ALDS can unfold.
ALDS
In this case, the Angels have made it to the ALDS. I think the Rangers will have the best record in the AL, and so we have the matchups of the Rangers vs the Angels and the Yankees vs the Tigers. It's a difficult call to make here. The Tigers went over the Yankees last year, but the Yankees got better and the Tigers really didn't. I'll take the Yankees, please. The Rangers and the Angels is a tough nut to crack - just as the division is nearly a toss up to me, so is this series. Hey, look, there's that coin again. The coin says Angels, so there you have it folks. If the second wild card makes it this year, then the Rays take the place of the Angels against the Rangers, in a series that I think would be just as close. I'll take the Rays this time, partly because the coin said so, but also because I think the Rays are a better team than the Angels and arguably better than Texas.
NLDS
One wild card and an assumption of the Phillies having the best record in the NL gives us the Phillies versus the Nationals and the Giants versus the Red. The first series I give to the Phillies, because they're basically the Nationals but with the rotation in its prime, while the Nationals rotation needs a little more time to get there. The Giants and the Reds is a little tougher of a call but I'll give it to the Giants. I think it's a case of the offense being that much better than the Reds offense and the pitching being just a little bit better. Swapping St. Louis for the Reds in case of a second wild card, I still like the Giants. I think they'll outpitch the Cardinals and while the Cardinals will bring an offensive threat, I still think the Giants outdo them.
ALCS
I still have two projected ALCS - the Yankees vs the Rays and the Yankees vs the Angels. For the former, their pitching lines up as dang near even to me, but the Yankees offense is much better than the Rays. I reluctantly give that series to the Yankees. For the latter, I like the Yankees offense a little bit more, the Angels rotation a lot more, and the Yankees bullpen a little bit more. It'd be tight, but I think I'd give it to the Angles. So, fantastic, now I have two World Series projections.
NLCS
Simpler this time, it's the Giants vs the Phillies. I like the Phillies all around better as a team than the Giants. Slightly better offense, much better pitching. Not a ton of conversation to be had about this one, methinks. I have the Phillies here.
World Series
Well, there's two of them. One is Yankees vs Phillies, the other is Phillies vs Angels. I certainly hope it's the latter, so I can root for somebody to win this thing. In the case of the former, we have the age old question come up - batting vs pitching. Who wins that? The track record seems to indicate t hat when it's a battle between the two, pitching wins. The Cardinals had very slightly better pitching than the Rangers, the Giants were the better pitchers, the Yankees were better on both scales, the Phillies were better pitchers than the Rays, and the Red Sox were better than the Rockies on both scales. So, over the last five years, when it came down to the battle, the pitching won. Admittedly, a small sample size and not necessarily the best argument anyway, but I would give it to the Phillies here. In the case of the latter,the Phillies still have better pitching, though to a lesser degree than they would over the Yankees, but conversely, the Phillies gain offensive ground over the Angels compared to the Yankees. The differences are less apparent now but I still like the Phillies with a small edge.
So, there you have it ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to put the prediction in now - your 2012 World Series champion will be the Philadelphia Phillies. Now excuse me while I sacrifice a goat to the elder gods, so that they might prove me wrong and let a more engaging and interesting team win. Of course, this is all way far out and before we even get to spring training in earnest, but this is the landscape as I see it now.
I hope everyone will make their own predictions and debate mine. My methodology is far from absolute and even I'm not thrilled with my pick to win it all.