Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
I've looked over the forum and one thing I've noticed quite that no matter which section you're in, there are a lot of posts regarding or at least mentioning Raw and how much it sucks. Now, going by the forum, it would seem that Raw seems to be in the shithouse but, then again, it's been said that the IWC makes up about 10% of the WWE audience at the most, some suggest the number is even less. Right now, hands down, the most criticized element of the WWE product is Raw.
Among the most general complaints I hear about Raw is that the main event scene is completely stale, Raw isn't pushing younger stars and the guest host concept sucks. You know, the typical "the WWE should do this", "The WWE should push this guy", "The WWE should make this sort of match" arguments that get brought up multiple times a day. While I do agree that Raw isn't pushing younger stars as much as they should be, is it really accurate to declare Raw is in overall bad shape?
To start with, let's see how Raw's done overall this year compared to last year. Now for the overall year of 2009, it's too early to make a definitive prediction as the year still has a good bit to go before being finished. But, some comparrisons can still be made. As of this past week, there've been 33 episodes of Raw to air this year and, so far this year, Raw has drawn an average of roughly 3.67 compared to about 3.38 for the first 33 episodes of 2008. Breaking it down, that means that Raw has had an average of around 290,000-300,000 more viewers tuned in for the first 33 weeks of 2009 than the first 33 weeks of 2008.
Now, Raw's ratings took a nosedive several times last year with 11 shows scoring a 3.0 or less. The lowest rated show last year was the September 15th episode, which drew a 2.6. In 2009 thus far, Raw's lowest number was the May 25th episode, which drew a 3.2. For 2008, Raw's average rating was a 3.20. Now, if Raw continues to draw consistently what it's been doing the past 9 weeks coupled with the rest of the year, then it looks to potentially finish the year with said 3.67 average. Now, a full point in the Nielsen Ratings stands for 1,145,000 households and, as things stand now and if they continue the same trend, Raw will be up nearly half a point this year compared with last, which would be an increase in Raw's viewership by well over 500,000.
Now as to the whole guest host thing, well another time comparrison can show whether it's working or not. Beginning with the Trump hosted commercial free show and up to this past week, Raw has drawn an average of roughly 3.80. Compared with the same time frame last year, Raw was drawing an average of 3.37. That's an increase of somewhere close to 500,000.
So, what's the point of all this number crunching? Well, I guess the point is that Raw just doesn't seem to be in quite the amount of trouble that the IWC is trying to say. While a small percentage of the audience may not like Raw, which is expected since you can't please everyone, the fact is that Raw seems to have had a healthy increase in viewers overall this year and looks to remain so unless something disasterous happens. While an increase of of 290,000 to over 500,000 might not sound overly dramatic, it's pretty good for a show on cable.
Now, while we can say on here that Raw sucks, that Vince doesn't know what he's doing, that Raw should do this and Raw should do that, the numbers Raw's been pulling in this year overall don't seem to reflect those views.
The Raw numbers can be found here: http://www.wrestlingnewsworld.com/wwe-ratings/ A few are missing as the numbers haven't been updated, but the numbers for Raw in August thus far have been 3.55, 3.8 and 3.8 according to WrestleZone.
Among the most general complaints I hear about Raw is that the main event scene is completely stale, Raw isn't pushing younger stars and the guest host concept sucks. You know, the typical "the WWE should do this", "The WWE should push this guy", "The WWE should make this sort of match" arguments that get brought up multiple times a day. While I do agree that Raw isn't pushing younger stars as much as they should be, is it really accurate to declare Raw is in overall bad shape?
To start with, let's see how Raw's done overall this year compared to last year. Now for the overall year of 2009, it's too early to make a definitive prediction as the year still has a good bit to go before being finished. But, some comparrisons can still be made. As of this past week, there've been 33 episodes of Raw to air this year and, so far this year, Raw has drawn an average of roughly 3.67 compared to about 3.38 for the first 33 episodes of 2008. Breaking it down, that means that Raw has had an average of around 290,000-300,000 more viewers tuned in for the first 33 weeks of 2009 than the first 33 weeks of 2008.
Now, Raw's ratings took a nosedive several times last year with 11 shows scoring a 3.0 or less. The lowest rated show last year was the September 15th episode, which drew a 2.6. In 2009 thus far, Raw's lowest number was the May 25th episode, which drew a 3.2. For 2008, Raw's average rating was a 3.20. Now, if Raw continues to draw consistently what it's been doing the past 9 weeks coupled with the rest of the year, then it looks to potentially finish the year with said 3.67 average. Now, a full point in the Nielsen Ratings stands for 1,145,000 households and, as things stand now and if they continue the same trend, Raw will be up nearly half a point this year compared with last, which would be an increase in Raw's viewership by well over 500,000.
Now as to the whole guest host thing, well another time comparrison can show whether it's working or not. Beginning with the Trump hosted commercial free show and up to this past week, Raw has drawn an average of roughly 3.80. Compared with the same time frame last year, Raw was drawing an average of 3.37. That's an increase of somewhere close to 500,000.
So, what's the point of all this number crunching? Well, I guess the point is that Raw just doesn't seem to be in quite the amount of trouble that the IWC is trying to say. While a small percentage of the audience may not like Raw, which is expected since you can't please everyone, the fact is that Raw seems to have had a healthy increase in viewers overall this year and looks to remain so unless something disasterous happens. While an increase of of 290,000 to over 500,000 might not sound overly dramatic, it's pretty good for a show on cable.
Now, while we can say on here that Raw sucks, that Vince doesn't know what he's doing, that Raw should do this and Raw should do that, the numbers Raw's been pulling in this year overall don't seem to reflect those views.
The Raw numbers can be found here: http://www.wrestlingnewsworld.com/wwe-ratings/ A few are missing as the numbers haven't been updated, but the numbers for Raw in August thus far have been 3.55, 3.8 and 3.8 according to WrestleZone.