A jury in Texas found Mr. Jeffs guilty of sexual assault on both a twelve year old girl and a fifteen year old, and will deliberate on sentencing today. Jeffs, the leader of the the Fundamentalist sect of the Church of the Latter Day saints(The Mormons), was found guilty after only 3 and a half hours of deliberation.
5 days into the trial, Jeffs bizarrely fired his expensive and high-powered legal team, choosing to represent himself instead. He immediately asked for constitutional protection citing religious beliefs, which was immediately denied. His request for a continuance so he could further prepare his own defense was denied as well by judge Barbara Walthers, who stated the following:
Jeffs reasoned that he fired his attorneys in that despite he spent a large amount of time schooling them in his beliefs, he felt they were unable to present him with a pure defense. Jeffs further said the following:
Despite Jeffs attempts to hide behind religious freedom and rights, the evidence against him is very damning. Prosecutor Eric Nichols presented a photo of the then 12(now 14) year old girl with her arm around Jeffs, brandishing a marriage certificate that listed the girl's age at 12. photo of her with her arms around Jeffs, and a marriage certificate which listed the girl's age as 12 at the time. The prosecution also presented audio recording which showed Jeffs instructing the fourteen(now 15) year old girl on how to please him, noting that pleasing him the proper way would bring her "closer to God." The 14 year old girl was considered to be Jeffs "spiritual wife", and paternity tests showed Jeffs fathered a child with her when she was 15. After presenting this evidence, Nichols closed with this:
The case grew even more bizarre when Jeffs failed to defend himself for the most part. He called no witnesses, took forever to answer simple questions from the judge, and did not object to any evidence or testimony from witnesses. During his closing arguments, Jeffs simply stared at the jury for 20 minutes silently, before utterring the words "I am at peace." The question raised by the media throughout the trial was if Jeffs was using the "Answer them nothing" defense, which is the same thing he instructed his 10,000 followers to do throughout the investigation. Jeffs created his own sect of the church due to the Mormons denouncing polygamy, and now claims over 10,000 followers, of which he continues to oversee from prison through blogs to them.
Regardless of his defense, or his "beliefs" surrounding his freedom of religion, the prosecutor hit the nail on the head. This has nothing to do with religion, beliefs, or faith. It has everything to do with using those things to coerce others into following him into his deviant lifestyle blindly, including those who were too young or naive to know better. The worst part is those who genuinely desired to please God, and were so convinced by Jeffs that this was the right way. The man deserves to rot, and gives other religious leaders who do hold to moral beliefs a bad name. Jeffs is a perfect(and deservedly so) "scapegoat" for people to point to whenever a religious leader is called into question for impropriety, whether right or wrong. However, that's just my opinion, what say you?
With Jeff's possibly sentencing to be between 5 years to life in prison for the assault on the 12 year old, and 2 to 20 years on the fifteen year old, what would you consider a just sentencing?
Is this case an indictment on only Jeffs, but also on his 10,000 followers who practice similarly to him as well?
With Jeffs still running his "church" from prison, is this a time the government should step in to stop this?
5 days into the trial, Jeffs bizarrely fired his expensive and high-powered legal team, choosing to represent himself instead. He immediately asked for constitutional protection citing religious beliefs, which was immediately denied. His request for a continuance so he could further prepare his own defense was denied as well by judge Barbara Walthers, who stated the following:
"Allowing for further delays would be tantamount to manipulating the court.
Mr. Jeffs, the court is not going to recess these proceedings to let you go to law school"
Jeffs reasoned that he fired his attorneys in that despite he spent a large amount of time schooling them in his beliefs, he felt they were unable to present him with a pure defense. Jeffs further said the following:
"I feel this is an injustice being performed. Allowing the case to go forward means that true justice is unable to be served. Isn't that the the purpose of the court of law in a nation that professes true justice be served?"
Despite Jeffs attempts to hide behind religious freedom and rights, the evidence against him is very damning. Prosecutor Eric Nichols presented a photo of the then 12(now 14) year old girl with her arm around Jeffs, brandishing a marriage certificate that listed the girl's age at 12. photo of her with her arms around Jeffs, and a marriage certificate which listed the girl's age as 12 at the time. The prosecution also presented audio recording which showed Jeffs instructing the fourteen(now 15) year old girl on how to please him, noting that pleasing him the proper way would bring her "closer to God." The 14 year old girl was considered to be Jeffs "spiritual wife", and paternity tests showed Jeffs fathered a child with her when she was 15. After presenting this evidence, Nichols closed with this:
Do not be swayed by Jeffs' frequent invocations of religious freedom as a defense.This case has nothing to do with an attack on religion. Instead, it is about Jeffs and his actions.
The case grew even more bizarre when Jeffs failed to defend himself for the most part. He called no witnesses, took forever to answer simple questions from the judge, and did not object to any evidence or testimony from witnesses. During his closing arguments, Jeffs simply stared at the jury for 20 minutes silently, before utterring the words "I am at peace." The question raised by the media throughout the trial was if Jeffs was using the "Answer them nothing" defense, which is the same thing he instructed his 10,000 followers to do throughout the investigation. Jeffs created his own sect of the church due to the Mormons denouncing polygamy, and now claims over 10,000 followers, of which he continues to oversee from prison through blogs to them.
Regardless of his defense, or his "beliefs" surrounding his freedom of religion, the prosecutor hit the nail on the head. This has nothing to do with religion, beliefs, or faith. It has everything to do with using those things to coerce others into following him into his deviant lifestyle blindly, including those who were too young or naive to know better. The worst part is those who genuinely desired to please God, and were so convinced by Jeffs that this was the right way. The man deserves to rot, and gives other religious leaders who do hold to moral beliefs a bad name. Jeffs is a perfect(and deservedly so) "scapegoat" for people to point to whenever a religious leader is called into question for impropriety, whether right or wrong. However, that's just my opinion, what say you?
With Jeff's possibly sentencing to be between 5 years to life in prison for the assault on the 12 year old, and 2 to 20 years on the fifteen year old, what would you consider a just sentencing?
Is this case an indictment on only Jeffs, but also on his 10,000 followers who practice similarly to him as well?
With Jeffs still running his "church" from prison, is this a time the government should step in to stop this?