[YOUTUBE]74rE8E_CcGQ[/YOUTUBE]
I'm sure a lot of you remember this promo. Randy Orton announcing that the Age of Orton has begun. The idea was pretty good, and it was definitely something that could've given Randy a long, and successful run as heel. He had successfully retained at Wrestlemania against the two biggest faces of the company at that given moment, and he was on a roll of momentum.
Unfortunately, Triple H and Randy Orton faced each other in at Last Man Standing match, which ended with Triple H walking out champion once again, and Randy Orton being put on the bench with a collarbone injury, putting him out for about 3-4 months.
Sure it's not a critical amount of length, but it was more than enough to Orton to lose some momentum. It was more than enough to have him return as something else. The Age of Orton storyline seemingly was dropped and Legacy was on the road to being formed.
Surely it's a decent substitute. Randy Orton and Legacy did well in both getting heat, as well as getting Orton over with huge momentum in a big storyline with Triple H in 2009. However, there were definitely a lot of potential behind the Age of Orton storyline if you ask me.
Randy went on to become champion again, and he became dominant once again in the main event scene with Legacy. Surely the presence of Cody and Ted caused the potential to relaunch the Age of Orton to be a little damaged, which I find to be a shame.
Anyway, I guess the question at hand should be presented.
Did Randy Orton's collarbone injury end what could've possibly been one of the biggest storyline / angle of Randy's career? Or was it a good thing that send Randy towards the viper gimmick?
Do you feel WWE should have continued the Age of Orton upon Randy's return from injury, and therefore would ignore the Legacy faction?
Do you think an Age of Orton could be relaunched now? As a tweener?